Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1757-1871
  • E-ISSN: 1757-188X

Abstract

Postmodern dance and somatics have foregrounded the sense of touch via the skin as a subject of inquiry and a catalyst for change, nowhere more so than in Paxton’s Contact Improvisation (CI). Touch continues to be explored choreographically, beyond CI, in contemporary dance to increasingly stage more daring, excessive sensuality and erotics between performers and performers/audience for mainstream theatre. Such tactile strategies and displays, I suggest, raise timely questions about the politics of touch and what touch constitutes. This article is the second instalment of a wider research project that attempts to unsettle Global North and the dance discipline’s presuppositions about physical contact. Here, I build upon one of Paxton’s lesser-known theoretical influences that spurred the development of CI, namely his research into mother–child touch communication and ask: how might a feminist reassessment of maternal relationality – its haptics – generate new knowledge about touch and neo-liberal economy? How might such reconception move us towards different bodily practices and ethics grounded in the twenty-first century in dance and beyond?

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00085_1
2023-01-25
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S.. ( 2006), Queer Phenomenology, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J.. ( 1967;), ‘ Judith Dunn and the endless quest. ’, Dance Magazine, 41, November, pp. 48–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzieu, D.. ( [1985] 1995), Le Moi-peau, Paris:: Dunod;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Auberville, S.,, Halpern-Hamu, C.,, Lasdon, S.,, Rea, K., and Schaffer, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Dialogue recorded: White people, consent, and contact improvisation, 30 May 2020. ’, Contact Quarterly, 27 July, https://contactquarterly.com/cq/rolling-edition/view/consent-and-contact-improvisation-dialogue. Accessed 22 December 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachrach, A.,, Bartley, C.,, Kim, R.,, Ku, M.-S.,, Lasdon, S.,, Lee, Y. W.,, van Niekerk, A.,, Paxton, S.,, Pourian, H.. and Radical Contact ( 2018;), ‘ On CI intersections: A question from CQ, and a round of responses. ’, Contact Quarterly, 43:2, https://contactquarterly.com/contact-improvisation/newsletter/view/ci-intersections#$. Accessed 22 December 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Balibar, E., and Wallerstein, I.. ( 1991), Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (trans. C. Turner.), New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Banes, S.. ( 1993), Democracy’s Body: Judson Dance Theater 1962–64, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baraitser, L.. ( 2009), Maternal Encounters: The Ethics of Interruption, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bardi, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Voice movement integration summer intensive. ’, workshop participant, Roccatederighi, Italy, 21–25 July.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Beaulieux, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ How the first rule brought #MeToo to contact improvisation. ’, Contact Quarterly, 44:1, https://contactquarterly.com/cq/article-gallery/view/how-the-first-rule-brought-metoo-to-contact-improvisation#. Accessed 22 December 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Benthien, C.. ( [1999] 2002), Skin: On the Cultural Border between Self and the World (trans. T. Dunlap.), New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Berardi, F.. ‘ Bifo. ’ ( 2017), Futurability: The Age of Impotence and the Horizon of Possibility, New York and London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bindler, N.. ( 2018;), ‘ Clitoral embodiment. ’, workshop , Goldsmiths University;, London:, 16 March.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Broadhurst, S., and Machon, J.. ( 2012), Sensualities/Textualities and Technologies, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Burt, R.. ( 2006), Judson Dance Theatre: Performative Traces, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Butler, J.. ( 1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Butler, J.. ( 1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chaleff, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Activating Whiteness: Racializing the ordinary in US American postmodern dance. ’, Dance Research Journal, 50:3, pp. 71–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Classen, C.. ( 2005), The Book of Touch, Oxford and New York:: Berg;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Clément, C.. ( 1994), Syncope: The Philosophy of Rapture (trans. S. O’Driscolle, and D. M. Mahoney.), Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fannin, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Placental relations. ’, Feminist Theory, 15:3, pp. 289–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Field, T.. ( [2001] 2003), Touch, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Foá, M.,, Grisewood, J.,, Hosea, B., and McCall, C.. ( 2020), Performance Drawing: New Practices since 1945, London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Foucault, M.. ( 1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York:: Vintage Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Foucault, M.. ( [1976] 1998), The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Freud, S.. ( 1905;), ‘ Three essays on the theory of sexuality. ’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume VII (1901–1905): A Case of Hysteria, London:: Hogarth Press;, pp. 123–246.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Furse, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Being touched. ’, in J. Matthews. (ed.), A Life of Ethics and Performance, Cambridge:: Cambridge Scholars Press;, pp. 45–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Giotaki, G.. ( 2015;), ‘ Emergent movements: The role of embodiment and somatics in British contemporary dance. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Coventry:: Coventry University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gottschild Dixon, B.. ( 1996), Digging the Africanist Presence in American Performance: Dance and Other Contexts, Westport, CT:: Praeger;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Grosz, E.. ( 1994), Volatile Bodies towards a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Haraway, D.. ( 1990), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Haraway, D.. ( 2016), Manifestly Haraway, London and Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hay, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ A continuity of discontinuity or a way to practice dance. ’, workshop, Independent Dance, London, 3–7 December.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hennessy, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Questioning contact improvisation: Excerpts from a zine by Keith Hennessy. ’, Contact Quarterly, 44:1, https://contactquarterly.com/contact-improvisation/newsletter/view/questioning-ci. Accessed 3 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hird, M.. ( 2007;), ‘ The corporeal generosity of maternity. ’, Body & Society, 13:1, pp. 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Irigaray, L.. ( 1984), Ethique de la différence sexuelle, Paris:: Minuit;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Irigaray, L.. ( 1991;), ‘ The bodily encounter with the mother. ’ (trans. D. Macey.), in M. Whitford. (ed.), The Irigaray Reader, Oxford:: Basil Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Irigaray, L.. ( 1993), An Ethics of Sexual Difference (trans. C. Burke, and G. C. Gill.), Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Irigaray, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Perhaps cultivating touch can still save us. ’, SubStance, 40:3, pp. 130–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jones, O.. ( 2021;) ‘ Here’s what the COVID inquiry didn’t tell you: Being poor was like a death sentence. ’, The Guardian, 14 October, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/14/covid-poor-people-uk-government-tories-died-in-thousands. Accessed 14 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kampe, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Re: Moving whiteness – Decolonising the field?. ’, online event, Creative Corporealities Research Group, Bath Spa University, 29 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kristeva, J.. ( 1975), Desire in Language (trans. T. Gora,, A. Jardine, and L. S. Roudiez.), reprinted in K. Oliver. (ed.), The Portable Kristeva, New York:: Columbia University Press;, 1997 .
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lane, C.. ( 1998), The Psychoanalysis of Race, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Lannen, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Per-forming the sense of touch: A spatio-temporal embodied technology of resistance. ’, Body, Space & Technology, 19:1, pp. 22–55, https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.329.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Laplanche, J.. ( 1976), Life and Death in Psychoanalysis (trans. J. Mehlman.), Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Laplanche, J.. ( 1997;), ‘ The theory of seduction and the problem of the other. ’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, pp. 653–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lepecki, A.. ( 2006), Exhausting Dance: Performance and the Politics of Movement, New York and London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Linchtenberg-Ettinger, B.. ( 1997;), ‘ The feminine/prenatal weaving in matrixial subjectivity-as-encounter. ’, Psychoanalytical Dialogues, 7:3, pp. 367–405.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Livingstone, A.. ( 2018), Male Breastfeeding, Hebbel-Am-Ufe, Berlin, 7–10 March.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Mbembe, A.. ( 2003;), ‘ Necropolitics. ’, Public Culture, 15:1, pp. 11–40, https://doi:10.1215/08992363-15-1-11. Accessed 19 March 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Meg Stuart/Damaged Goods ( [2015] 2017;), Until Our Hearts Stop. , Kaaitheater;, Brussels:, 19– 21 November 2015 .
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Meg Stuart/Damaged Goods ( 2018;), Sketches/Notebook. , HAU Hebbel am Ufer;, Berlin:, 7 March.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( [1945] 1962), Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith.), London:: Routledge and Kegan Paul;.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( [1964] 1968), The Visible and the Invisible, Evanston, IL:: Northwestern University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mitra, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Talking politics of contact improvisation with Steve Paxton. ’, Dance Research Journal, 50:3, pp. 6–18, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767718000335. Accessed 23 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Mitra, R.. ( 2022;), ‘ Unmaking contact: Choreographic touch at the intersection of race, caste and gender. ’, Dance Research Journal, 53:3, pp. 6–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mitra, R.,, Fernandes Rosa, C.,, Stanger, A., and Ellis, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Anti-racist dance practices. ’, workshop, Independent Dance, London, 15 September.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Montagu, A.. ( [1971] 1986), Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin, New York:: Harper & Row;.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Nelson, L.. ( 2004;), ‘ Before your eyes: Seeds of a dance practice. ’, Contact Quarterly, 29:1, pp. 20–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Nelson, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Tuning scores laboratory: Composition, communication, and the sense of imagination. ’, workshop, Independent Dance, London, February.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Novack, C. J.. ( 1990), Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Olaya, A., and Skrzypczak, W.. ( 2019;), ‘ Queer Contact Improvisation (QCI): Alliance and disruption experiences and reflections from the QCI Symposium and Festival Hamburg 2018. ’, Contact Quarterly, 44:2, https://contactquarterly.com/cq/article-gallery/index.php#view=queer-contact-improvisation-qci-alliance-and-disruption. Accessed 3 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Oliver, K.. ( 1994), Womanizing Nietzsche: Philosophy’s Relation to the Feminine, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Oliver, K.. ( 1998), Subjectivity without Subjects: From Abject Fathers to Desiring Mothers, Lanham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield;.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Olufemi, L.. ( 2020), Feminism, Interrupted: Disrupting Power, London:: Pluto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Papadelli, V.. ( 2011;), personal correspondence with Steve Paxton. , 14 May.
  67. Papadelli, V.. ( 2013;), ‘ Towards a movement practice of attunement: An incorporation of elements from Song of the Goat Theatre and Contact Improvisation. ’, Ph.D. thesis, London:: Department of Theatre and Performance Goldsmiths, University of London;.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Papadelli, V.. ( 2020;), ‘ Sensing and making sense of touch within movement. ’, in M. Sarco-Thomas. (ed.), Thinking Touch in Partnering and Contact Improvisation: Philosophy, Pedagogy, Practice, Newcastle upon Tyne:: Cambridge Scholars Publishing;, pp. 180–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Paxton, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ So here you are, against all obstacles ... A talk by Steve Paxton at Culturgest in Lisbon, 2019. ’, Contact Quarterly, 45:1, https://contactquarterly.com/cq/unbound/view/so-here-you-are-against-all-obstacles. Accessed 27 November 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Perron, W.. ( 2020), The Grand Union: Accidental Anarchists of Downtown Dance, 1970–1976, Middletown, CT:: Wesleyan University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Phelan, P.. ( 1996), Unmarked: The Politics of Performance, Abingdon-on-Thames:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Preciado, P. B.. ( 2013), Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era, New York:: Feminist Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Preciado, P. B.. ( 2014), Pornotopia: An Essay on Playboy’s Architecture and Biopolitics, New York:: Zone Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Preciado, P. B.. ( [2000] 2018), Countersexual Manifesto (trans. K. G. Dunn.), New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Prosser, J.. ( 1998), Second Skins: The Body Narratives of Transsexuality, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rice, G.. ( 2001;), ‘ Programme 1: The first sense. ’, Touch, BBC Radio 4, 9 July.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Rich, A.. ( 1977), Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution, London:: Virago;.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Rouch, H.. ( 1987;), ‘ Le placenta comme tiers. ’, Langages, 85, pp. 71–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. de Sausmarez, M.. ( 2009), Basic Design: The Dynamics of Visual Forms, London:: Herbert Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sharma, S.. ( 2014), In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. de Sousa Santos, B.. ( 2007), Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies, London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Stanger, A.. ( 2021), Dancing on Violent Ground, Evanston, IL:: Northwestern University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Stearney, L. M.. ( 1994;), ‘ Feminism, ecofeminism, and the maternal archetype: Motherhood as a feminine universal. ’, Communication Quarterly, 42:2, pp. 145–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369923. Accessed 13 November 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Stern, D. N.. ( 1977), The First Relationship: Mother and Infant, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Stern, D. N.. ( 2010), Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, the Arts, Psychotherapy, and Development, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Stryker, S.. ( [2008] 2017), Transgender History: The Roots of Today’s Revolution, New York:: Seal Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Stuart, M.. ( 2018), Meg Stuart/Damaged Goods: Sketches/Notebook/Inside the Magic Cave, Berlin:: Hebbel am Ufer;, https://vimeo.com/254308148. Accessed 18 May 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Todd, M. E.. ( [1937] 2008), The Thinking Body, Gouldsboro:: Gestalt Journal Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wingenroth, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ We need to talk about non-consensual audience participation. ’, Dance Magazine , 11 October, https://www.dancemagazine.com/we-need-to-talk-about-non-consensual-audience-participation/. Accessed 23 June 2018.
  90. Wong, Y.. ( 2002;), ‘ Towards a new Asian American dance theory: Locating the dancing Asian American body. ’, Discourses in Dance, 1:1, pp. 69–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Lannen, Maud. ( 2022;), ‘ Touching across: Performing new dance ecologies through dialogical choreographies. ’, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 14:2, pp. 165–82, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp_00085_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00085_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): desire; economics; ethics; maternal relationality; movement; technics; the body; touch

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test