Gaga and naming as eco-somatic practices of enchantment

References

1. Albright, A., and Gere, D.. ( 2003), Taken by Surprise: A Dance Improvisation Reader, Middletown, CT:: Wesleyan University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anon. ( 2019;), ‘ Gaga as embodied research (New Writer’s Prize Article). ’, Research in Dance Education, 20:1, pp. 5–18.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barad, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ Nature’s queer performativity. ’, Qui Parle, 19:2, pp. 121–58, https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121. Accessed 7 March 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bennett, J.. ( 2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bennett, J.. ( 2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bird-David, N.. ( 1999;), ‘ “Animism” revisited: Personhood, environment and relational epistemology. ’, Current Anthropology, 40:S1, pp. S67–S91.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bird Rose, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ Dreaming ecology: Beyond the between. ’, Religion and Literature, 40:1, pp. 109–22.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boyd, M., and Wilson, N.. ( 2021;), ‘ Failures with COVID-19 at the international level must not be repeated in an era facing global catastrophic biological risks. ’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 45:2, p. 184.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, A. M.. ( 2017), Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds, Chico, CA:: AK Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cuomo, C. J.. ( 1998), Feminism and Ecological Communities: An Ethic of Flourishing, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Efird, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Perceiving nature’s personhood: Anthropological enhancements to environmental education. ’, in H. Kopnina, and E. Shoreman-Ouimet. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 441–51, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768946.ch34. Accessed 1 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Federici, S.. ( 2004), Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, New York:: Autonomedia;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Federici, S.. ( 2018), Re-Enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons, Toronto:: Between the Lines;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Federici, S.. ( 2020), Beyond the Periphery of the Skin: Rethinking, Remaking, and Reclaiming the Body in Contemporary Capitalism, Toronto:: Between the Lines;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fisher, M.. ( 2009), Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, Portland, OR:: Zero Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fortin, S.. ( 2002;), ‘ Living in movement: Development of somatic practices in different cultures. ’, Journal of Dance Education, 2:4, pp. 128–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2002.10387221. Accessed 28 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fraleigh, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Moving consciously: Somatic transformations through dance, yoga, and touch. ’, Journal of Dance Education, 16:2, pp. 72–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2015.1120146. Accessed 28 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fraleigh, S.. ( 2018), Back to the Dance Itself: Phenomenologies of the Body in Performance, Chicago, IL:: University of Illinois;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gavin, F. J., and Brands, H.. ( 2020), COVID-19 and World Order: The Future of Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;, https://doi.org/10.1353/book.77593. Accessed 24 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gell, A.. ( 1992;), ‘ The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. ’, in J. Coote, and A. Shelton. (eds), Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics, Oxford:: Clarendon;, pp. 40–66.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gell, A.. ( 1998), Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gilbert, B.. ( 2018), Ghost Trees: Nature and People in a London Parish, Salford:: Saraband;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Harris, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Embodied eco-paganism. ’, in G. Harvey. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Animism, London:: Routledge;, pp. 403–15.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Heymann, T.. ( 2015;), ‘ Mr. Gaga. ’, Israel:: Heymann Brothers Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ingold, T.. ( 2000), The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling, and Skill, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jenkins, R.. ( 2000;), ‘ Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. ’, Max Weber Studies, 1:1, pp. 11–32.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kant, I.. ( [1790] 1914), Kant’s Critique of Judgement (trans. N. K. Bernard.), London:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Katan, E.. ( 2016), Embodied Philosophy in Dance, Gaga and Ohad Naharin’s Movement Research, London:: Palgrave Macmillan UK;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Khosrawipour, V.,, Lau, H.,, Khosrawipour, T.,, Kocbach, P.,, Ichii, H.,, Bania, J., and Mikolajczyk, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Failure in initial stage containment of global COVID-19 epicenters. ’, Journal of Medical Virology, 92:7, pp. 863–67.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kuper, A.. ( 1988), The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Latour, B.. ( 1993), We Have Never Been Modern (trans. C. Porter.), Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Liu, J. H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Majority world successes and European and American failure to contain COVID-19: Cultural collectivism and global leadership. ’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24:1, pp. 23–29.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Macfarlane, R., and Morris, J.. ( 2017), The Lost Words: A Spell Book, London:: Hamish Hamilton;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Marx, K.. ( 1988), Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (trans. M. Milligan.), Buffalo, NY:: Prometheus Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( 1962), Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith.), London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Morphy, H.. ( 2009;), ‘ Art as a mode of action: Some problems with Gell’s Art and Agency. ’, Journal of Material Culture, 14:1, pp. 5–27.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Morton, T.. ( 2018), Being Ecological, London:: Penguin Books Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reeve, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ On the way to regenerative choreography. ’, Choreographic Practices, 9:1, pp. 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1386/chor.9.1.75_1. Accessed 26 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Robertson, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Glocalization. ’, in H. Callan, and S. Coleman. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (Major Reference Works), Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley;, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2275. Accessed 19 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Taiwo, O.. ( 2013;), ‘ The Dance of the Return Beat: Performing the animate universe. ’, in G. Harvey. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Animism, London:: Routledge;, pp. 491–500.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Viveiros de Castro, E.. ( 1998;), ‘ Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. ’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4:3, pp. 469–88.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Weber, M.. ( 1918), Science as a Vocation, Munich:: Munich University;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Weber, M.. ( 2005), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (trans. T. Parsons.), New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sanger, Andrew. ( 2022;), ‘ Gaga and naming as eco-somatic practices of enchantment. ’, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 14:2, pp. 263–75, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp_00086_1
    [Google Scholar]