Skip to content
1981
1-2: 6th International Dance and Somatic Practices Conference - Reconnections: Looking back, moving forward, enacting change
  • ISSN: 1757-1871
  • E-ISSN: 1757-188X

Abstract

This article challenges the assumption of contact improvisation (CI) as a gender-neutral dance form, as it has been claimed since the emergence of the dance form in the 1970s and pertained until recent times. Drawing on ethnographic research in Montreal (2019), the investigation combines autoethnography and participant observation to examine the influence of gender roles and power dynamics on the dance floor. To understand the claim of egalitarianism in CI, the study first exposes a discourse analysis of CI’s initial gender egalitarian ideology (1970s) and its reaction against dominant dance forms like ballet. The article discusses the role of the body in ethnographic work, suggesting that the researcher’s sensorial and affective experiences can challenge scholarly assumptions and fieldwork’s discourses. By highlighting how knowledge is embodied, the article emphasizes anthropology’s contribution to dance theory through the disclosure of knowledge via somatic experience.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • SNSF-Swiss National Science Foundation (Award P2LAP1_184157)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00128_1
2024-12-06
2025-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jdsp/16/1-2/jdsp.16.1-2.13_Vionnet.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00128_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albright, Ann Cooper (2017), ‘The politics of perception’, in R. J. Kowal, G. Siegmund and R. Martin (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 22343.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aterianus-Owanga, Alice (2019), ‘“Sabar, sama thiosanou” (sabar, ma tradition): Frontières et propriété culturelles dans la transmission des danses sénégalaises en Europe’, Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 35:3–4, pp. 15374, https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.13737.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbour, Karen (2011), ‘Writing, dancing, embodied knowing: Autoethnographic research’, in D. Davida (ed.), Fields in Motion: Ethnography in the Worlds of Dance, Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, pp. 10118.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biagioli, Mario (1995), ‘Tacit knowledge, courtliness, and the scientist’s body’, in S. L. Foster (ed.), Choreographing History, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 6981.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre ([1972] 2000), Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle, Paris: Le Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre (1998), La domination masculine, Paris: Le Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cazemajou, Anne (2011), ‘Shifting positions: From the dancer’s posture to the researcher’s posture’, in D. Davida (ed.), Fields in Motion: Ethnography in the Worlds of Dance, Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, pp. 1928.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Copeland, Roger ([1997] 2000), ‘Sexual politics’, in S. E. Friedler and S. B. Glazer (eds), Dancing Female: Lives and Issues of Women in Contemporary Dance, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 12338.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cox, Roy (2011), ‘Thinking through movement: Practising martial arts and writing ethnography’, in T. Ingold (ed.), Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines, Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 6576.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Curtis, Jess (1996), ‘Why talk (dance, paint) about sex?’, Contact Quarterly, 21:1, pp. 5357.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Curtis, Jess (2015), ‘Movement in the men’s movement: Contact improvisation and social change’, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 7:1, pp. 12942.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davida, Dena (ed.) (2011), Fields in Motion: Ethnography in the Worlds of Dance, Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Farnell, Brenda (2000), ‘Getting out of the habitus: An alternative model of dynamically embodied social action’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6:3, pp. 397418.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fulkerson, Mary (1996), ‘Taking the glove without the hand’, Contact Quarterly, Special Issue: ‘Focus on Sexuality & Identity’, 21:1, pp. 4042.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanna, Judith L. (1988), Dance, Sex and Gender, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hechler, Andreas (2007), ‘Heteronormativity in contact improvisation’, Contact Festival Freiburg, http://www.contactfestival.de/english/archiv/textdocu/other/owsites/07AHechler.htm. Accessed 21 August 2024.
  17. Hennessy, Keith (1996), ‘Love and sex, touch and weight: 11 notes on sexuality, sex, gender, community and contact improvisation’, Contact Quarterly, 21:1, pp. 6870.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ingold, Tim (2000), The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jussilainen, Anna (2015), ‘Contact improvisation as an art of relating: The importance of touch for building positive interaction’, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 7:1, pp. 11327, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp.7.1.113_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Koteen, David and Stark Smith, Nancy (2008), Caught Falling: The Confluence of Contact Improvisation, Nancy Stark Smith, and Other Moving Ideas, Holyoke, MA: Marcus Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Koutsouba, Marie (1999), ‘“Outside” in an “inside” world, or dance ethnography at home’, in T. J. Buckland (ed.), Dance in the Field: Theory, Methods and Issues in Dance Ethnography, New York: St. Martin’s Press and INC, pp. 18695.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Le Breton, David ([1990] 2005), Anthropologie du corps et modernité, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McConnell, Carolyn ([1997] 2000), ‘The body never lies’, in S. E. Friedler and S. B. Glazer (eds), Dancing Female: Lives and Issues of Women in Contemporary Dance, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 21526.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Minestrelli, Chiara (2017), Australian Indigenous Hip Hop: The Politics of Culture, Identity, and Spirituality, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitra, Royona (2018), ‘Talking politics of contact improvisation with Steve Paxton’, Dance Research Journal, 50:3, pp. 618, https://doi.org/0.1017/S0149767718000335.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitra, Royona (2021), ‘Unmaking contact: Choreographic touch at the intersections of race, caste, and gender’, Dance Research Journal, 53:3, pp. 624, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767721000358.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nordera, Marina (2007), ‘Gender underway: Notes for histories yet to be written’, in S. Franco and M. Nordera (eds), Dance Discourses: Keywords in Dance Research, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 16983.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Novack, Cynthia (1990), Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Oliver, Wendy and Risner, Doug (eds) (2017), Dance and Gender, Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre (1998), ‘Émique’, L’Homme, 147, pp. 15166.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pini, Sarah, Mcllwain, Doris J. F. and Sutton, John (2016), ‘Re-tracing the encounter: Interkinaesthetic forms of knowledge in contact improvisation’, Antropologia e teatro, 7, pp. 22643.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rea, Kathleen (2017), ‘“That lady”: A woman puts up a boundary in the contact improv world’, Contact Improv Consent Culture Blog, 3 December, https://contactimprovconsentculture.com/2017/12/03/first-blog-post/. Accessed 21 August 2024.
  33. Rustad, Hilde (2019), ‘Contact improvisation and dance narratives: Body memory and embodied knowledge’, På Spissen forskning (Dance Articulated), Special Issue: ‘Bodily Learning’, 5:2, pp. 2745, https://doi.org/10.18862/PS.2019.502.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stark Smith, Nancy, Hennessy, Keith, Albright, Ann Cooper, Cron-Riger, Geneviève, Schwartz, Daniela, Alexander, Kent, Arfa, Zach, Will, Taja, Rea, Kathleen and brooks, mayfield (2018), ‘On CI intersections: A question from CQ, and a round of responses’, Contact Quarterly, 43:2, pp. 3439.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Surrallés, Alexandre (2004), ‘Des états d’âme aux états de fait: La perception entre le corps et les affects’, in F. Héritier and M. Xanthakou (eds), Corps et affects, Paris: Odile Jacob, pp. 5975.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tomko, Linda J. (2007), ‘Feminine/masculine’, in S. Franco and M. Nordera (eds), Dance Discourses: Keywords in Dance Research, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 10118.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Torr, Diane (1996), interviewed by P. Langland, ‘Between the cracks: Gender and sexual identity in the new dance/performance scene’, Contact Quarterly, 21:2, pp. 1625.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Turner, Terence S. (2007), ‘The social skin’, in M. Lock and J. Farquhar (eds), Beyond the Body Proper: Reading the Anthropology of Material Life (Body, Commodity, Text), Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, pp. 83103.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vionnet, Claire (2022a), ‘An auto-ethnography of engagement through dance’, Tsantsa, 27, pp. 7893, https://doi.org/10.36950/tsantsa.2022.27.7770.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Vionnet, Claire (2022b), L’ombre du geste: Le(s) sens de l’expérience en danse contemporaine, Genève: Georg.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wacquant, Loïc (2002), Corps et âme: Carnets ethnographiques d’un apprenti boxeur, Marseille: Agone.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wieringa, Saskia and Sívori, Horacio (2013), The Sexual History of the Global South: Sexual Politics in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, London: Zed Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams, Simon J. and Bendelow, Gillian A. (1998), The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Yardley, Brooks (2017), ‘Respecting boundaries/coexisting genders women’s experiences of feeling unsafe in contact improv’, Contact Improvisation Dance Canada, http://contactimprov.ca/doc/ci_en6_web.pdf. Accessed 21 August 2024.
  45. Hennessy, Keith (2019), ‘Questioning contact improvisation: Excerpts from a zine’, CQ Contact Improvisation Newsletter, https://contactquarterly.com/contact-improvisation/newsletter/view/questioning-ci#$. Accessed 21 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Okely, Judith (2007), ‘Fieldwork embodied’, The Sociological Review, 55:1, pp. 6579.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00128_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00128_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test