1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00001_2
2020-01-01
2022-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jem/1/1/jem.1.1.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00001_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Besley, John C., and Nisbet, Matthew. ( 2011;), ‘ How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. ’, Public Understanding of Science, 22:6, pp. 64459.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bozak, Nadia. ( 2011), The Cinematic Footprint, New Brunswick:: Rutgers University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brereton, Pat. ( 2005), Hollywood Utopia: Ecology in Contemporary American Cinema, Bristol:: Intellect Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox, Robert, and Pezzullo, Phaedra. ( 2016), Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, Thousand Oaks:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cubitt, Sean. ( 2005), EcoMedia, Amsterdam:: Rodopi Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cubitt, Sean. ( 2016), Finite Media, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, Sarah R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. ’, Science Communication, 29:4, pp. 41334.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabrys, Jennifer. ( 2013), Digital Rubbish, Ann Arbor:: University of Michigan Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gabrys, Jennifer. ( 2016) Program Earth, Minneapolis:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosh, Amitav. ( 2016), The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable, Chicago:: Chicago University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Horst, Heather, and Miller, Daniel. ( 2012), Digital Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ingram, David. ( 2004), Green Screen, Exeter:: University of Exeter Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivakhiv, Adrian. ( 2013), Ecologies of the Moving Image, Waterloo:: Wilfred Laurier Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kääpä, Pietari. ( 2018), Environmental Management of the Media: Policy, Industry, Practice, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Maibach, Edward,, Roser-Renouf, Connie, and Leiserowitz, Anthony. ( 2009), Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis, Yale Project on Climate Change , New Haven, CT:: Yale University and George Mason University;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mar, Raymond A., and Oatley, Keith. ( 2008;), ‘ The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. ’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3:3, pp. 17392.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Markowitz, Ezra,, Hodge, Caroline, and Harp, Gabriel. ( 2014), Connecting on Climate: A Guide to Effective Climate Change Communication, New York:: The Trustees of Columbia University;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Maxwell, Richard, and Miller, Toby. ( 2012), Greening the Media, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MORI and Wellcome Trust ( 2001;), ‘ The role of scientists in public debate. ’, The Wellcome Trust , 16 May, http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Publicengagement/WTD003429.htm Accessed 19 March 2001.
  20. Murray, Robin L., and Heumann, Joseph K.. ( 2009), Ecology and Popular Film, New York:: SUNY Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nisbet, Matthew. ( 2009;), ‘ Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement environment. ’, Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51:2, pp. 1223.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nisbet, Matthew C.,, Hixon, Mark,, Moore, Kathleen, and Nelson, Michael. ( 2010;), ‘ Four cultures: New synergies for engaging society on climate change. ’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8:6, pp. 32931.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nisbet, Matthew C., and Mooney, Chris. ( 2007;), ‘ Framing Science. ’, Science, 316:5821, p. 56.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nixon, Rob. ( 2011), Slow Violence and the Environmental Violence of the Poor, Cambridge and London:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearson, Gillian,, Pringle, Susan M., and Thomas, Jeffrey N.. ( 1997;), ‘ Scientists and the public understanding of science. ’, Public Understanding of Science, 6:3, pp. 27989.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Perreault, Tom,, Bridge, Gavin, and McCarthy, James. (eds) ( 2015), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, Abingdon:: Taylor & Francis;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peters, Hans Peter. ( 2013;), ‘ Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 110:3, pp. 1410209.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Poliakoff, Ellen, and Webb, Thomas L.. ( 2007;), ‘ What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities?. ’, Science Communication, 29:2, pp. 24263.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Roser-Renouf, Connie,, Stenhouse, Neil,, Rolfe-Redding, Justin,, Maibach, Edward W., and Leiserowitz, Anthony. ( 2014;), ‘ Engaging diverse audiences with climate change: Message strategies for global warmings six Americas. ’, Handbook of Environment and Communication, Oxon:: Routledge;, pp. 36886.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rust, Steven,, Monani, Salma, and Cubitt, Sean. (eds) ( 2013), Ecocinema: Theory and Practice, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryan, Charlotte, and Brown, Kimberly Freeman. ( 2015;), ‘ To act in concert: Environmental communication from a social movement lens. ’, in A. Hansen, and R. Cox. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, Oxon:: Routledge;, pp. 13142.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shome, Debika, and Marx, Sabine. ( 2009), The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aids, and the Interested Public, New York:: The Trustees of Columbia University;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Starosielski, Nicole. ( 2015), The Undersea Network, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Starosielski, Nicole, and Walker, Janet. (eds) ( 2016), Sustainable Media, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Strange, J. J.. ( 2002;), ‘ How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs: Models and mechanisms of fictional influence. ’, in M. C. Green,, J. J. Strange, and T. C. Brock. (eds), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, Mahwah, NJ:: Erlbaum;, pp. 26386.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Strober, Myra H.. ( 2011a), Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought, Stanford:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Strober, Myra H.. ( 2011b;), ‘ Communicating across the academic divide. ’, Journal of Higher Education, 1 February, https://www.chronicle.com/article/Communicating-Across-the/125769. Accessed 9 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sturgis, Patrick, and Allum, Nick. ( 2004;), ‘ Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. ’, Public Understanding of Science, 13, pp. 5574.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vaughan, Hunter. ( 2019), Hollywood’s Dirtiest Secret: The Hidden Environmental Costs of the Movies, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Weber, Elke U.. ( 2006;), ‘ Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). ’, Climatic Change, 77:1&2, pp. 10320.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00001_2
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00001_2
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Editorial
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error