Skip to content
1981
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Through a combination of scientific and community activity, our environment is increasingly registered and documented as data. Given the expanding breadth of this digital domain, it is crucial that scholars consider the problems it presents as well as its affirmative potential. This article, arising from collaboration between a practitioner and theorist in digital design and a film and screen scholar with expertise in documentary and environmental studies, critically examines biodiversity data through an ecocritical reading of public-facing databases, citizen science platforms and data visualizations. We examine the ; ; the City of Melbourne’s ; and the experimental visualization . Integrating perspectives from screen studies, design and the environmental humanities, including multispecies studies approaches in anthropology, we examine how digital representations reflect the way biodiversity data is produced and structured. Critically analysing design choices – what is shown, and how it is shown – we argue that biodiversity data on-screen provides specific affordances: allowing, encouraging or discouraging certain insights and possibilities that condition our knowledge of and engagement with living things. An interdisciplinary approach allows us to ask new questions about how users might experience multispecies worlds in digital form, and how biodiversity data might convey the complexities of an entangled biosphere, amplifying understanding, connection and attention amongst interested publics. We examine the visual rhetorics of digital biodiversity in order to better understand how these forms operate as environmental media: designed representations of the living world.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00041_1
2021-03-01
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jem/2/1/jem.2.1.79_Whitelaw.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00041_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Antonello, A., and Morgan, R. A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Making and unmaking bodies: Embodying knowledge and place in environmental history. ’, International Review of Environmental History, 4:1, pp. 55–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Atlas of Living Australia ( n.d.a;), ‘ About us. ’, https://www.ala.org.au/about-ala/. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  3. Atlas of Living Australia ( n.d.b;), ‘ Explore your area. ’, https://biocache.ala.org.au/explore/your-area. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  4. Bedingfield, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ A short history, Canberra Nature Map. ’, https://canberra.naturemapr.org/Content/History. Accessed 20 January 2020.
  5. Biodiversity Heritage Library ( n.d.;), ‘ About BHL. ’, https://about.biodiversitylibrary.org/. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  6. Canberra Nature Map ( 2019a;), ‘ Elanus axillaris (black-shouldered kite). ’, https://canberra.naturemapr.org/Sightings/4209391. Accessed 21 January 2020.
  7. Canberra Nature Map ( 2019b;), ‘ Pseudophryne bibronii (brown toadlet). ’, https://canberra.naturemapr.org/Sightings/4208393. Accessed 21 January 2020.
  8. Canberra Nature Map ( n.d.a;), ‘ Canberra Nature Map. ’, https://canberra.naturemapr.org/. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  9. Canberra Nature Map ( n.d.b;), ‘ Defined locations. ’, https://canberra.naturemapr.org/locations/maps. Accessed 20 January 2020.
  10. City of Melbourne ( 2018;), ‘ Insects, insects – City of Melbourne. ’, http://biodiversity.melbourne.vic.gov.au/insects/index.html. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  11. Cubitt, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Everybody knows this is nowhere: Data visualisation and ecocriticism. ’, in S. Rust,, S. Monani, and S. Cubitt. (eds), Ecocinema Theory and Practice, , 1st ed.., Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 279–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Daston, L., and Galison, P.. ( 2007), Objectivity, Cambridge, MA:: Zone Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, J. L., and Chouinard, J. B.. ( 2016;), ‘ Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. ’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36:4, pp. 241–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dickinson, J. L.,, Shirk, J.,, Bonter, D.,, Bonney, R.,, Crain, R. L.,, Martin, J.,, Phillips, T., and Purcell, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. ’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10:6, pp. 291–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Drucker, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ Humanities approaches to graphical display. ’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5:1, http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html. Accessed 21 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Drucker, J., and Nowviskie, B.. ( 2004;), ‘ Speculative computing: Aesthetic provocations in humanities computing. ’, in S. Schreibman,, R. Siemens, and J. Unsworth. (eds), A Companion to Digital Humanities, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 431–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Heise, U. K.. ( 2016), Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Houser, H.. ( 2014;), ‘ The aesthetics of environmental visualizations: More than information ecstasy?. ’, Public Culture, 26:2, pp. 319–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Houston, D.,, Hillier, J.,, MacCallum, D.,, Steele, W., and Byrne, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and “becoming-world” in planning theory. ’, Planning Theory, 17:2, pp. 190–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hustak, C., and Myers, N.. ( 2012;), ‘ Involutionary momentum: Affective ecologies and the sciences of plant/insect encounters. ’, differences, 23:3, pp. 74–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kearney, S. G.,, Cawardine, J.,, Reside, A. E.,, Fisher, D. O.,, Maron, M.,, Doherty, T. S.,, Legge, S.,, Silcock, J.,, Woinarski, J. C. Z.,, Garnett, S. T.,, Wintle, B. A., and Watson, J. E. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ The threats to Australia’s imperilled species and implications for a national conservation response. ’, Pacific Conservation Biology, 25:3, pp. 231–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lorimer, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Nonhuman charisma. ’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25:5, pp. 911–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Loukissas, Y. A.. ( 2019), All Data Are Local: Thinking Critically in a Data-Driven Society, , 1st ed.., Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Manovich, L.. ( 2001), The Language of New Media, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Manovich, L.. ( 2002;), ‘ Data visualization as new abstraction and anti-sublime. ’, http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/data-visualisation-as-new-abstraction-and-anti-sublime. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  26. Sánchez-Bayo, F., and Wyckhuys, K. A. G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. ’, Biological Conservation, 232, April, pp. 8–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sayre, N. F.. ( 2009;), ‘ Scale. ’, in N. Castree,, D. Demeritt,, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoad. (eds), A Companion to Environmental Geography, Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley-Blackwell;, pp. 95–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Seltzer, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ About iNaturalist. ’, https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/about. Accessed 21 January 2020.
  29. Sharma, N.,, Greaves, S.,, Siddharthan, A.,, Anderson, H.,, Robinson, A.,, Colucci-Gray, L.,, Wibowo, A. T.,, Bostock, H.,, Salisbury, A.,, Roberts, S.,, Slawson, D., and van der Wal, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ From citizen science to citizen action: Analysing the potential for a digital platform to cultivate attachments to nature. ’, Journal of Science Communication, 18:1, p. A07.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsing, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Arts of inclusion, or, how to love a mushroom. ’, Australian Humanities Review, 50, May, pp. 5–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Dooren, T.. ( 2014), Flight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Whatmore, S.. ( 2002), Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces, London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Whitelaw, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Local Kin – A visual explorer for biodiversity data. ’, http://mtchl.net/local-kin/. Accessed 10 January 2020.
  34. Whitelaw, Mitchell, and Smaill, Belinda. ( 2021;), ‘ Biodiversity data as public environmental media: Citizen science projects, national databases and data visualizations. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 2:1, pp. 79–99, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00041_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00041_1
Loading
Biodiversity data as public environmental media: Citizen science projects, national databases and data visualizations
Journal of Environmental Media 2, 79 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00041_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00041_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00041_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Australia; biodiversity; citizen science; data; multispecies; visualization

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test