Integrating media studies concepts into theories of the policy process: Enhancing the role of media as a climate service in the wake of recurring extreme weather events

References

1. Albright, E. A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Policy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in Hungary: An advocacy coalition approach. ’, Policy Studies Journal, 39:3, pp. 485–511.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alimi, E., and Maney, G. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Focusing on focusing events: Event selection, media coverage, and the dynamics of contentious meaning-making. ’, Sociological Forum, 33:3, pp. 757–82.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Rawi, A.,, Kane, O., and Bizimana, A.. ( 2021;), ‘ Topic modelling of public Twitter discourses, part bot, part active human user, on climate change and global warming. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 2:1, pp. 31–53.
   [Google Scholar]
4. American Meteorological Society ( 2015;), ‘ Climate services. ’, 17 September, https://www.ametsoc.org. Accessed 3 September 2022.
5. Bail, C. A.,, Argyle, L. P.,, Brown, T. W.,, Bumpus, J. P.,, Chen, H.,, Hunzaker, M. B. F.,, Lee, J.,, Mann, M.,, Merhout, F., and Volfovsky, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115:37, pp. 9216–21.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ballew, M. T.,, Leiserowitz, A.,, Roser-Renouf, C.,, Rosenthal, S. A.,, Kotcher, J. E.,, Marlon, J. R.,, Lyon, E.,, Goldberg, M. H., and Maibach, E. W.. ( 2019;), ‘ Climate change in the American mind: Data, tools, and trends. ’, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61:3, pp. 4–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bandura, A., and Cherry, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Enlisting the power of youth for climate change. ’, American Psychologist, 75:7, pp. 945–51.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B.. ( 2009), Agendas and Instability in American Politics, , 2nd ed.., Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beebe, J. R.,, Baghramian, M.,, Drury, L., and Dellsén, F.. ( 2019;), ‘ Divergent perspectives on expert disagreement: Preliminary evidence from climate science, climate policy, astrophysics, and public opinion. ’, Environmental Communication, 13:1, pp. 35–50.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berglez, P., and Al-Saqaf, W.. ( 2021;), ‘ Extreme weather and climate change: Social media results, 2008–2017. ’, Environmental Hazards, 20:4, pp. 382–99.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berkowitz, D.. ( 1992;), ‘ Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions. ’, in J. D. Kennamer. (ed.), Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy, Westport, CT:: Praeger;, pp. 81–102.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Birkland, T. A.. ( 1997), After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events, Washington, DC:: Georgetown University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bloomfield, E. F., and Tillery, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ The circulation of climate change denial online: Rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook. ’, Environmental Communication, 13:1, pp. 23–34.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bolsen, T., and Shapiro, M. A.. ( 2018;), ‘ The US news media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication. ’, Environmental Communication, 12:2, pp. 149–63.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bose, F., and Moran, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Do focusing events and narratives drive pharma rent-seeking: Evidence from disease outbreaks. ’, Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20:6, pp. 11–29.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Boushey, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. ’, Policy Studies Journal, 40:1, pp. 127–46.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bovaird, T.. ( 2007;), ‘ Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. ’, Public Administration Review, 67:5, pp. 846–60.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Boykoff, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital cultures and climate change: “Here and now”. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 21–25.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Brekken, K. C., and Fenley, V. M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Part of the narrative: Generic news frames in the U.S. recreational marijuana policy subsystem. ’, Politics & Policy, 45:4, pp. 626–56.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bruner, E., and DeLuca, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ The argumentative force of image networks: Greenpeace’s panmediated global detox campaign. ’, Argumentation and Advocacy, 52:4, pp. 281–99.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cairney, P., and Jones, M. D.. ( 2016;), ‘ Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory?. ’, The Policy Studies Journal, 44:1, pp. 37–58.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ceccarelli, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. ’, Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14:2, pp. 195–228.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chinn, S.,, Hart, P. S., and Soroka, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985–2017. ’, Science Communication, 42:1, pp. 112–29.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cobb, R. W., and Elder, C. D.. ( 1983), Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building, , 2nd ed.., Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cook, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. ’, in I. E. Chiluwa, and S. A. Samoilenko. (eds), Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online, Hershey, PA:: IGI Global;, pp. 281–306.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Crow, D. A., and Lawlor, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. ’, Review of Policy Research, 35:5, pp. 472–91.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Delicath, J. W., and DeLuca, K. M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. ’, Argumentation, 17:3, p. 315.
    [Google Scholar]
28. DeLuca, K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Greenpeace international media analyst reflects on communicating climate change. ’, Environmental Communication, 3:2, pp. 263–69.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Doyle, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. ’, Science as Culture, 16:2, pp. 129–50.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Duran-Becerra, B.,, Hillyer, G. C.,, Cosgrove, A., and Basch, C. H.. ( 2020;), ‘ Climate change on YouTube: A potential platform for youth learning. ’, Health Promotion Perspectives, 1:3, pp. 282–86.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ebi, K. L.,, Vanos, J.,, Baldwin, J. W.,, Bell, J. E.,, Hondula, D. M.,, Errett, N. A.,, Hayes, K.,, Reid, C. E.,, Saha, S.,, Spector, J., and Berry, P.. ( 2021;), ‘ Extreme weather and climate change: Population health and health system implications. ’, Annual Review of Public Health, 42, pp. 293–315.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ejelöv, E.,, Hansla, A.,, Bergquist, M., and Nilsson, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Regulating emotional responses to climate change: A construal level perspective. ’, Frontiers in Psychology, 9:629, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Eldridge, S. A.. ( 2018), Online Journalism from the Periphery: Interloper Media and the Journalistic Field, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Eman, S.,, Grebel, T., and Tudor, A.-D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Do we need disasters to adopt more environmental policies?. ’, Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10:24, pp. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Entman, R. M.. ( 1993;), ‘ Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. ’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Entman, R. M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. ’, Political Communication, 20:4, pp. 415–32.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Farman, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Stories, spaces, and bodies: The production of embodied space through mobile media storytelling. ’, Communication Research and Practice, 1:2, pp. 101–16.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Feldman, L., and Hart, P. S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Broadening exposure to climate change news? How framing and political orientation interact to influence selective exposure. ’, Journal of Communication, 68:3, pp. 503–24.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Geiger, N., and Swim, J. K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, pp. 79–90.
    [Google Scholar]
40. George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication ( n.d.;), ‘ Global warming’s six Americas. ’, https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/global-warmings-six-americas/. Accessed 18 January 2023.
41. Goffman, E.. ( 1974), Frame Analysis, New York:: Free Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gottfried, J.,, Stocking, G.,, Grieco, E.,, Walker, M.,, Khuzam, M., and Mitchell, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Trusting the news media in the Trump era. ’, Pew Research Center, 12 December, https://www.journalism.org/2019/12/12/trusting-the-news-media-in-the-trump-era/. Accessed 25 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Graber, D. A.. ( 1988), Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Longman;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Groff, S. P.. ( 2021;), ‘ Magnifying focusing events: Global smoke plumes and international construal connections in newspaper coverage of 2020 wildfire events. ’, Frontiers in Communication, 6, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Groff, S. P.. ( 2022;), ‘ International climate cooperation and the watershed of policy streams. ’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 25:1, pp. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hai, Z., and Perlman, R. L.. ( 2022;), ‘ Extreme weather events and the politics of climate change attribution. ’, Science Advances, 8:36, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Halleck, R., and Burch, A. D. S.. ( 2022;), ‘ Strange scenes of Ian: From a doorbell camera. ’, New York Times, 3 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/hurricane-ian-ring-doorbell-camera.html. Accessed 16 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Harel, T. O.,, Jameson, J. K., and Maoz, I.. ( 2020;), ‘ The normalization of hatred: Identity, affective polarization, and dehumanization on Facebook in the context of intractable political conflict. ’, Social Media Society, 6:2, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913983.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hewitt, C. D.,, Stone, R. C., and Tait, A. B.. ( 2017;), ‘ Improving the use of climate information in decision making. ’, Nature Climate Change, 7:9, pp. 614–16.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hoecker, T. J.,, Higuera, P. E.,, Kelly, R., and Sheng Hu, F.. ( 2020;), ‘ Arctic and boreal paleofire records reveal drivers of fire activity and departures from Holocene variability. ’, Ecology, 101:9, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hopke, J. E.. ( 2020;), ‘ Connecting extreme heat events to climate change: Media coverage of heat waves and wildfires. ’, Environmental Communication, 14:4, pp. 492–508.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Houston, J. B.,, Pfefferbaum, B., and Rosenholtz, C. E.. ( 2012;), ‘ Disaster news: Framing and frame changing in coverage of major U.S. natural disasters, 2000–2010. ’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89:4, pp. 606–23.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Inamara, A., and Thomas, V.. ( 2017;), ‘ Pacific climate change adaptation: The use of participatory media to promote indigenous knowledge. ’, Pacific Journalism Review, 23:1, pp. 113–32.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jacob, D.,, Runge, T.,, Street, R.,, Parry, M., and Scott, J.. ( 2015), A European Research and Innovation Roadmap for Climate Services, Brussels:: European Commission;.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Jasny, L., and Fisher, D. R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Echo chambers in climate science. ’, Environmental Research Communication, 1:10, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jones, M. D., and McBeth, M. K.. ( 2010;), ‘ A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. ’, Policy Studies Journal, 38:2, pp. 329–53.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Keele, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Consultants and the business of climate services: Implications of shifting from public to private science. ’, Climatic Change, 157:1, pp. 9–26.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kingdon, J.. ( 1995), Agenda, Alternatives and Public Policies, , 2nd ed.., New York:: HarperCollins;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Latkin, C.,, Dayton, L.,, Coyle, C.,, Yi, G.,, Lee, D.-I., and Winiker, A.. ( 2021;), ‘ The relationship between social norms, avoidance, future orientation, and willingness to engage in climate change advocacy communications. ’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18:24, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Latour, B.. ( 2015;), ‘ Telling friends from foes in the time of the Anthropocene. ’, in C. Hamilton,, F. Gemenne, and C. Bonneuil. (eds), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 145–55.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Leiserowitz, A.,, Maibach, E.,, Rosenthal, S.,, Kotcher, J.,, Neyens, L.,, Marlon, J.,, Carman, J.,, Lacroix, K., and Goldberg, M.. ( 2022), Global Warming’s Six Americas, September 2021: Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT:: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication;.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Mahony, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Picturing the future-conditional: Montage and the global geographies of climate change. ’, Geo: Geography and the Environment, 3:2, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Maibach, E. W.,, Nisbet, M.,, Baldwin, P.,, Akerlof, K., and Diao, G.. ( 2010;), ‘ Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. ’, BMC Public Health, 10:1, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Marlon, J. R.,, van der Linden, S.,, Howe, P. D.,, Leiserowitz, A.,, Lucia Woo, S. H., and Broad, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Detecting local environmental change: The role of experience in shaping risk judgments about global warming. ’, Journal of Risk Research, 22:7, pp. 936–50.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Martin, C., and MacDonald, B. H.. ( 2020;), ‘ Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media. ’, PLoS ONE, 15:11, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
66. McAdam, D., and Sewell Jr., W. H.. ( 2001;), ‘ It’s about time: Temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions. ’, in R. Aminzade,, J. Goldstone,, D. McAdam,, E. Perry,, W. Sewell Jr.,, S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. (eds), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 89–125.
    [Google Scholar]
67. McCombs, M.. ( 2004), Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion, Hoboken, NJ:: Blackwell Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
68. McCombs, M., and Shaw, D.. ( 1972;), ‘ The agenda-setting function of mass media. ’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36:2, pp. 176–87.
    [Google Scholar]
69. McHendry Jr., G. F.. ( 2012;), ‘ Whale Wars and the axiomatization of image events on the public screen. ’, Environmental Communication, 6:2, pp. 139–55.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Moore, F. C.,, Obradovich, N.,, Lehner, F., and Baylis, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Rapidly declining remarkability of temperature anomalies may obscure public perception of climate change. ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116:11, pp. 4905–10.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nohrstedt, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish nuclear energy policy. ’, The Policy Studies Journal, 36:2, pp. 257–78.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nohrstedt, D., and Weible, C. M.. ( 2010;), ‘ The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. ’, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1:2, pp. 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Nost, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Climate services for whom? The political economics of contextualizing climate data in Louisiana’s coastal Master Plan. ’, Climatic Change, 157:1, pp. 27–42.
    [Google Scholar]
74. O’Neill, S., and Boykoff, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. ’, in L. Whitmarsh,, I. Lorenzoni, and S. O’Neill. (eds), Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 233–51.
    [Google Scholar]
75. O’Neill, S., and Nicholson-Cole, S.. ( 2009;), ‘ “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. ’, Science Communication, 30:3, pp. 355–79.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Pace, L.. ( 2005;), ‘ Image events and PETA’s anti-fur campaign. ’, Women and Language, 28:2, pp. 33–41.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Parks, P.. ( 2020;), ‘ Is climate change a crisis: And who says so? An analysis of climate characterization in major U.S. news media. ’, Environmental Communication, 14:1, pp. 82–96.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., and Lewis, S. C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Increasing trends in regional heatwaves. ’, Nature Communications, 11:1, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Pezzullo, P. C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Between crisis and care: Projection mapping as creative climate advocacy. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 59–77.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Rebich-Hespanha, S.,, Rice, R. E.,, Montello, D. R.,, Retzloff, S.,, Tien, S., and Hespanha, J. P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Image themes and frames in US print news stories about climate change. ’, Environmental Communication, 9:4, pp. 491–519.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Romps, D. M., and Retzinger, J. P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Climate news articles lack basic climate science. ’, Environmental Research Communications, 1:8, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Roser-Renouf, C.,, Maibach, E.,, Leiserowitz, A.,, Rosenthal, S., and Kotcher, J.. ( 2021), Understanding the Health Harms of Climate Change: A Six Americas Analysis, New Haven, CT:: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication;.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Seijo, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Governing media information through a Green New Deal: History, theory, practice. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:2, pp. 209–24.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Shanahan, E. A.,, Jones, M. D., and McBeth, M. K.. ( 2011;), ‘ Policy narratives and policy processes. ’, Policy Studies Journal, 39:3, pp. 535–61.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Shiver-Rice, M., and Vaughan, H.. ( 2020;), ‘ What is environmental media studies?. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Spartz, J. T.,, Su, L. Y.-F.,, Griffin, R.,, Brossard, D., and Dunwoody, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ YouTube, social norms and perceived salience of climate change in the American mind. ’, Environmental Communication, 11:1, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Staggenborg, S.. ( 1993;), ‘ Critical events and the mobilization of the pro-choice movement. ’, Research in Political Sociology, 6:1, pp. 319–45.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Tsfati, Y.. ( 2010;), ‘ Online news exposure and trust in the mainstream media: Exploring possible associations. ’, American Behavioral Scientist, 54:1, pp. 22–42.
    [Google Scholar]
89. UNDRR ( 2020;), ‘ The human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years (2000–2019). ’, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, https://www.undrr.org/publication/human-cost-disasters-overview-last-20-years-2000-2019. Accessed 5 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Vaughan, H., and Johns, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ Beyond frame analysis: Formal analysis and genre typology in the communication study of short-form environmental video messaging. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 2:1, pp. 55–78.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Wallsten, K.. ( 2007;), ‘ Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. ’, Review of Policy Research, 24:6, pp. 567–87.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Walter, S.,, Brüggemann, M., and Engesser, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Echo chambers of denial: Explaining user comments on climate change. ’, Environmental Communication, 12:2, pp. 204–17.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Webb-Gannon, C., and Webb, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ “More than a music, it’s a movement”: West Papua decolonization songs, social media, and the remixing of resistance. ’, The Contemporary Pacific, 31:2, pp. 309–43.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Wood, R. S.. ( 2006;), ‘ Tobacco’s tipping point: The master settlement agreement as a focusing event. ’, The Policy Studies Journal, 34:3, pp. 419–36.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Zaller, J. R.. ( 1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Zhang, Z., and Ding, X.. ( 2017;), ‘ Public focusing events as catalysts: An empirical study of “pressure-induced legislations” in China. ’, Journal of Contemporary China, 26:107, pp. 664–78.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Groff, Stephen P.. ( 2022;), ‘ Integrating media studies concepts into theories of the policy process: Enhancing the role of media as a climate service in the wake of recurring extreme weather events. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 3:2, pp. 233–54, https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00088_1
    [Google Scholar]