Being outdoorsy indoors: Nature connectedness through 360-degree images and video

References

1. Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace), Bostick, Joshua, Ogle, Elise, Nowak, Kristine L., McGillicuddy, Kara T. and Bailenson, Jeremy N. (2016), ‘Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21:6, pp. 399–419, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arendt, Florian and Matthes, Jörg (2016), ‘Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior’, Environmental Communication, 10:4, pp. 453–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993415.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Breves, Priska and Schramm, Holger (2021), ‘Bridging psychological distance: The impact of immersive media on distant and proximal environmental issues’, Computers in Human Behavior, 115, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106606.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Capaldi, Colin A., Dopko, Raelyne L. and Zelenski, John M. (2014), ‘The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis’, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, pp. 976–76, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coyle, James R. and Thorson, Esther (2001), ‘The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites’, Journal of Advertising, 30:3, pp. 65–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cummings, James J. and Bailenson, Jeremy N. (2016), ‘How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence’, Media Psychology, 19:2, pp. 272–309, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ertz, Myriam, Karakas, Fahri and Sarigöllü, Emine (2016), ‘Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors’, Journal of Business Research, 69:10, pp. 3971–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Feldman, Lauren and Hart, P. Sol (2016), ‘Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions’, Science Communication, 38:1, pp. 99–127, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015617941.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Filter, Elin, Eckes, Alexander, Fiebelkorn, Florian and Büssing, Alexander G. (2020), ‘Virtual reality nature experiences involving wolves on YouTube: Presence, emotions, and attitudes in immersive and nonimmersive settings’, Sustainability, 12:9, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093823.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hartmann, Tilo, Wirth, Werner, Schramm, Holger, Klimmt, Cristoph, Vorderer, Peter, Gysbers, André, Böcking, Saskia, Ravaja, Niklas, Laarni, Jari, Saari, Timo, Gouveia, Ferliz and Sacau, Ana M. (2016), ‘The spatial presence experience scale (SPES): A short self-report measure for diverse media settings’, Journal of Media Psychology, 28:1, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hayes, Andrew F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis a Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed., New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Higuera-Trujillo, Juan L., López-Tarruella Maldonado, Juan and Llinares Millán, Carmen (2017), ‘Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between photographs, 360° panoramas, and virtual reality’, Applied Ergonomics, 65, pp. 398–409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006.
    [Google Scholar]
13. IPCC (2021), ‘Summary for policymakers’, in V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–41, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jackson, Sally (1992), Message Effects Research: Principles of Design and Analysis, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 25–49.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Johnson, Branden B. (2002), ‘Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution’, Risk Analysis, 22:4, pp. 725–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00064.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lee, Kwan Min (2004), ‘Presence, explicated’, Communication Theory, 14:1, pp. 27–50, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lo, Wai H. and Cheng, Kai L. B. (2020), ‘Does virtual reality attract visitors? the mediating effect of presence on consumer response in virtual reality tourism advertising’, Information Technology & Tourism, 22:4, pp. 537–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00190-2.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Louvre (n.d.), ‘Online tours’, Le Louvre, https://www.louvre.fr/en/online-tours. Accessed 15 May 2022.
19. Mackay, Caroline M. L. and Schmitt, Michael T. (2019), ‘Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mandler, Timo, Johnen, Marius and Gräve, Jan-Frederik (2020), ‘Can’t help falling in love? How brand luxury generates positive consumer affect in social media’, Journal of Business Research, 120, pp. 330–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.010.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Marlow, Jennifer and Dabbish, Laura (2014), ‘When is a picture not worth a thousand words? The psychological effects of mediated exposure to a remote location’, Computers in Human Behavior, 30, pp. 824–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.002.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martin, Leanne, White, Matthew P., Hunt, Anne, Richardson, Miles, Pahl, Sabine and Burt, Jim (2020), ‘Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Massingham, Emily, Fuller, Richard A. and Dean, Angela J. (2019), ‘Pathways between contrasting ecotourism experiences and conservation engagement’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 28:4, pp. 827–45, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-01694-4.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mayer, F. Stephan and Frantz, Cynthia M. (2004), ‘The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24:4, pp. 503–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mayer, F. Stephan, Frantz, Cynthia M., Bruehlman-Senecal, Emma and Dolliver, Kyffin (2009), ‘Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature’, Environment and Behavior, 41:5, pp. 607–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nisbet, Elizabeth K. and Zelenski, John M. (2013), ‘The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness’, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nisbet, Elizabeth K., Zelenski, John. M. and Murphy, Steven A. (2009), ‘The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior’, Environment and Behavior, 41:5, pp. 715–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Oh, Jeeyun, Jin, Eunjoo, Sudarshan, Sabitha, Nah, Soya and Yu, Na (2021), ‘Does 360-degree video enhance engagement with global warming? The mediating role of spatial presence and emotions’, Environmental Communication, 15:6, pp. 731–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1891945.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Otto, Siegmar and Pensini, Pamela (2017), ‘Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour’, Global Environmental Change, 47, pp. 88–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Petrova, Petia K. and Cialdini, Robert B. (2005), ‘Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals’, The Journal of Consumer Research, 32:3, pp. 442–52, https://doi.org/10.1086/497556.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Skurka, Chris, Niederdeppe, Jeff and Nabi, Robin (2019), ‘Kimmel on climate: Disentangling the emotional ingredients of a satirical monologue’, Science Communication, 41:4, pp. 394–421, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019853837.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Soliman, Monica, Peetz, Johanna and Davydenko, Mariya (2017), ‘The impact of immersive technology on nature relatedness and pro-environmental behavior’, Journal of Media Psychology, 29:1, pp. 8–17, https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000213.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Steuer, Jonathan (1992), ‘Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence’, Journal of Communication, 42:4, pp. 73–93, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tam, Kim-Pong (2013), ‘Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, pp. 64–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
    [Google Scholar]
35. The Trust for Public Land (2020), ‘The heat is on: With temperatures rising and quality parks too few and far between, communities of color face a dangerous disparity’, https://www.tpl.org/heat-trust-public-land-special-report. Accessed 5 May 2021.
36. Tukachinsky, Riva (2014), ‘Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media’, Communication Methods and Measures, 8:1, pp. 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Van Kerrebroeck, Helena, Brengman, Malaika and Willems, Kim (2017), ‘When brands come to life: Experimental research on the vividness effect of virtual reality in transformational marketing communications’, Virtual Reality, 21:4, pp. 177–91, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0306-3.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Whitburn, Julie, Linklater, Wayne and Abrahamse, Wokje (2020), ‘Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior’, Conservation Biology, 34:1, pp. 180–93, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13381.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wirth, Werner, Hartmann, Tilo, Böcking, Saskia, Vorderer, Peter, Klimmt, Christoph, Schramm, Holger, Saari, Timo, Laarni, Jari, Ravaja, Niklas, Gouveia, Feliz R., Biocca, Frank, Sacau, Ana, Jäncke, Lutz, Baumgartner, Thomas and Jäncke, Petra (2007), ‘A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences’, Media Psychology, 9:3, pp. 493–525, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701283079.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Yaden, David B., Kaufman, Scott B., Hyde, Elizabeth, Chirico, Alice, Gaggioli, Andrea, Zhang, Jia W. and Keltner, Dacher (2019), ‘The development of the awe experience scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion’, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14:4, pp. 474–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484940.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yeo, Nicola L., White, Mathew P., Alcock, Ian, Garside, Ruth, Dean, Sarah G., Smalley, Alexander J. and Gatersleben, Birgitta (2020), ‘What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360° video, and computer generated virtual reality’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101500.
    [Google Scholar]