The feral film habit of OJOBOCA

References

1. Ahmed, Sara (2011), ‘Willful parts: Problem characters or the problem of character’, New Literary History, 42:2, pp. 231–253.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baron, Jaime (2014), The Archive Effect: Found Footage and the Audiovisual Experience of History, London: Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baron, Jaime (2020), Reuse, Misuse, Abuse: The Ethics of Audiovisual Appropriation in the Digital Era, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barton, Diane P., Fahey, Hannah, Jenkins, David J. and Shamsi, Shokoofeh (2023), ‘Zoonotic parasites in feral animals commonly consumed in Australia: Is there a risk?’, Current Clinical Microbiology Reports, 10:2, pp. 66–73.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berghoff, Hartmut and Kolbow, Berti (2013), ‘Flourishing in a dictatorship: Agfa’s marketing and the Nazi regime’, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 5:1, pp. 71–96.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beugnet, Martine and Knowles, Kim (2013), ‘The aesthetics and politics of obsolescence: Hand-made film in the era of the digital’, MIRAJ: Moving Image Review & Art Journal, 2:1, pp. 54–65.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bozak, Nadia (2012), The Cinematic Footprint: Lights, Camera, Natural Resources, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, V. R., Bowen, R. A. and Bosco-Lauth, A. M. (2018), ‘Zoonotic pathogens from feral swine that pose a significant threat to public health’, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 65:3, pp. 649–59.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cahill, James Leo (2019), Zoological Surrealism: The Nonhuman Cinema of Jean Painlevè, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Camic, Charles (1986), ‘The matter of habit’, American Journal of Sociology, 91:5, pp. 1039–87.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Catanese, Rosella and Parikka, Jussi (2018), ‘Handmade films and artist-run labs: The chemical sites of film’s counterculture’, NECUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 7:2, pp. 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cavarero, Adriana (2009), Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence (trans. W. McCuaig), New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chen, Mel Y (2012), Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chodorov, Pip (2019), ‘The artist-run film labs’, in S. MacKenzie and J. Marchessault (eds), Process Cinema: Handmade Film in the Digital Age, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 165–71.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Collard, Rosemary-Claire, Dempsey, Jessica and Sundberg, Juanita (2015), ‘A manifesto for abundant futures’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Special Issue: ‘Futures: Imagining Socioecological Transformation’, 105:2, pp. 322–30.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Conrad, Tony (1965–66), The Flicker, USA: Tony Conrad.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Denson, Shane and Leyda, Julia (eds) (2016), Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film, Falmer: Reframe Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Doane, Mary Ann (2021), Bigger Than Life: The Close-Up and Scale in the Cinema, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dornieden, Anja and González Monroy, Juan David (2013), ‘From eye to mouth, from mouth to eye’, workshop, 26 September, http://ojoboca.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/FETM-FMTE-Program.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dornieden, Anja and González Monroy, Juan David (2015a), ‘Horrorism for beginners/beginners for horrorism’, 13 April, http://ojoboca.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/HFB-BFH-Program.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2021.
21. Dornieden, Anja and González Monroy, Juan David (2015b), The Masked Monkeys, Germany and Indonesia: OJOBOCA.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dornieden, Anja and González Monroy, Juan David (2018), Comfort Stations, Germany: OJOBOCA.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dornieden, Anja and González Monroy, Juan David (2020), Her Name Was Europa, Germany: OJOBOCA.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dornieden, Anja, González Monroy, Juan David, and Kim, Andrew (2022), Instant Life, Germany and USA: OJOBOCA.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Driessen, Clemens and Lorimer, Jamie (2016), ‘Back breeding the aurochs: The Heck brothers, national socialism, and imagined geographies for non-human Lebensraum’, in P. Giaccaria and C. Minca (eds), Hitler’s Geographies: The Spatialities of the Third Reich, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 138–57.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Elsaesser, Thomas (2016), Film History as Media Archeology: Tracking Digital Cinema, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Elsaesser, Thomas (2023), ‘The ethics of appropriation: Found footage between archive and internet’, in N. Erdogan and E. Kayaalp (eds), Exploring Past Images in a Digital Age: Reinventing the Archive, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 101–14.
    [Google Scholar]
28. ‘feral, adj.2’ (2023), OED Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/4833976443.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gaudreault, André and Marion, Philippe (2015), The End of Cinema? A Medium in Crisis in the Digital Age, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gering, Eben, Incorvania, Darren, Henriksen, Rie, Conner, Jeffrey, Getty, Thomas and Wright, Dominic (2019), ‘Getting back to nature: Feralization in animals and plants’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 34:12, pp. 1137–51.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gidal, Peter (1976), ‘Theory and definition of structural/materialist film’, in P. Gidal (ed.), Structural Film Anthology, London: British Film Institute, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Goldsmith, Leo (2023), ‘Prismatic Ground 2023’, e-flux, 23 May, https://www.e-flux.com/criticism/541354/prismatic-ground-2023. Accessed 30 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gómez-Barris, Macarena (2017), The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gunning, Tom (2017), ‘Flicker and shutter: Exploring cinema’s shuddering shadow’, in M. Beugnet, A. Cameron and A. Fetveit (eds), Indefinite Visions: Cinema and the Attractions of Uncertainty, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 53–70.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Halberstam, Jack (2020), Wild Things: The Disorder of Desire, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hampton, Jordan, Spencer, Peter B. S, Elliot, Aileen D. and Thompson, R. C. Andrew (2006), ‘Prevalence of zoonotic pathogens from feral pigs in major public drinking water catchments in western Australia’, EcoHealth, 3:2, pp. 103–08.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hertz, Garnet and Parikka, Jussi (2012), ‘Zombie media: Circuit bending media archeology into an art method’, Leonardo, 45:5, pp. 424–30.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Holl, Ute (2008), ‘Immersion oder alteration: Tony Conrads flickerfilm, Montage/av, 17:2, pp. 109–19.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holl, Ute (2017), Cinema, Trance and Cybernetics (trans. D. Hendrickson), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Huertas Millán, Laura, Igwe, Onyeka and Rakes, Rachel (2022), ‘Technological ecologies of encounter’, World Records Journal, 7, pp. 13–23, https://worldrecordsjournal.org/technological-ecologies-of-encounter/. Accessed 1 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Jaikumar, Priya and Grieveson, Lee (2022), ‘Media extraction: A brief research manifesto’, Journal of Environmental Media, 3:2, pp. 197–206.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Juhasz, Alexandra and Lerner, Jack (eds) (2006), F Is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kittler, Friedrich A. (1999), Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (trans. G. Wontrhop-Young and M. Wutz), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Knowles, Kim (2019), ‘Self-skilling and home-brewing: Some reflections on photochemical film culture’, in S. MacKenzie and J. Marchessault (eds), Process Cinema: Handmade Film in the Digital Age, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 75–84.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Knowles, Kim (2020), Experimental Film and Photochemical Practices, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Knowles, Kim (2021), ‘Introduction’, in K. Knowles and M. Schmid (eds), Cinematic Intermediality: Theory and Practice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lovejoy, Alice (2019), ‘Celluloid geopolitics: Film stock and the war economy, 1939–47’, Screen, 60:2, pp. 224–41.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lovejoy, Alice (2023), ‘From forests to film: Chemistry, industry, and the rise of nonflammable film stock’, JCMS, 62:2, pp. 151–56.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mabry, Makenzie E., Rowan, Troy N., Pires, J. Chris and Decker, Jared E. (2021), ‘Feralization: confronting the complexity of domestication and evolution’, Trends in Genetics, 37:4, pp. 302–05.
    [Google Scholar]
50. MacKenzie, Scott and Marchessault, Janine (eds) (2019), Process Cinema: Handmade Film in the Digital Age, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mattern, Shannon (2017), Code + Clay … Data + Dirt: Five Thousand Years of Urban Media, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mitchell, David T. and Snyder, Sharon L. (2005), ‘Compulsory feral-ization: Institutionalizing disability studies’, PMLA, 120:2, pp. 627–34.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nagy, Kelsi and Johnson II, Philip David (2013), ‘Introduction’, in K. Nagy and P. D. Johnson II (eds), Trash Animals: How We Live with Nature’s Filthy, Feral, Invasive and Unwanted Species, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nicholson, B., Petkova, S. and Gamble, P. (2022), ‘Instant life x instant life x instant life’, AltoKino, 4 April, https://www.altkino.com/writing/instant-life. Accessed 31 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Nikiforova, Mariya (2020), ‘The abominable community: Notes on independent filmmakers’ laboratories’, World Records Journal, 4, pp. 189–201, https://wrjournal.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Vol4_Art19_Abominable.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
56. OJOBOCA (2023), ‘CV’, https://OJOBOCA.com/cv/. Accessed 29 September 2023.
57. ORWO (2023), ‘About’, https://www.orwo.wtf/about. Accessed 20 December 2023.
58. Parikka, Jussi (2012), What Is Media Archaeology?, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Pasolini, Pier Paolo (1988), Heretical Empiricism (ed. L. Barnett, trans. B. Lawton and L. Barnett), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Perez-Sancho, Marta, Garcia-Seco, Teresa, Porrero, Concepcion, Garcia, Nerea, Gomez-Barrero, Susana, Camara, Jose Maria, Dominguez, Lucas and Alvarez, Julio (2020), ‘A ten-year surveillance program of zoonotic pathogens in feral pigeons in the City of Madrid (2005–2014): The importance of a systematic pest control’, Research in Veterinary Science, 128, pp. 293–98, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034528819304321?via%3Dihub. Accessed 22 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona (2016), ‘Five propositions on ferals’, Feral Feminisms, 6, pp. 19–21, https://feralfeminisms.com/issue1/issue-6-feral-theory. Accessed 26 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rangan, Pooja (2023), Thinking with an Accent: Toward a New Object, Method, and Practice, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Rutherford, Stephanie (2018), ‘The anthropocene’s animal? Coywolves as feral cotravelers’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1:1–2, pp. 206–23.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Sengupta, Rakesh (2020), ‘Towards a decolonial media archaeology: The absent archive of screenwriting history and the obsolete Munshi’, Theory, Culture & Society, 38:1, pp. 3–26.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Struthers, Kelly Montford and Taylor, Chloë (eds) (2016), ‘Feral Theory’, Feral Feminisms, 6, Fall, https://feralfeminisms.com/issue1/issue-6-feral-theory. Accessed 26 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Taetzsch, Sara J., Gruszynski, Karen R., Bertke, Andrea S., Dubey, Jitender P., Monti, Katelynn A., Zajac, Anne M. and Lindsay, David S. (2018), ‘Prevalence of zoonotic parasites in feral cats of central Virginia, USA’, Zoonoses and Public Health, 65:6, pp. 728–35.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tsing, Anna (2012), ‘Unruly edges: Mushrooms as companion species for Donna Haraway’, Environmental Humanities, 1:1, pp. 141–54.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Tsing, Anna (2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Van Dooren, Thom (2015), ‘On ferals’, Thom Van Dooren, 5 December, http://www.thomvandooren.org/2015/12/05/on-ferals/. Accessed 22 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Vaughan, Hunter (2019), Hollywood’s Dirtiest Secret: The Hidden Environmental Costs of the Movies, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Waterton, Claire and Yusoff, Kathryn (2017), ’Indeterminate Bodies: Introduction’, Body & Society, 23:3, pp. 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Wees, William (1993), Recycled Images, New York: Anthology Film Archives.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Wynne-Jones, Sophie, Clancy, Cara, Holmes, George, O’Mahoney, Kieran and Ward, Kim (2020), ‘Feral political ecologies? The biopolitics, temporalities and spatialities of rewilding’, Conservation and Society, 18:2, pp. 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Yoon, Hyaesin (2017), ‘Feral biopolitics: Animal bodies and/as border technologies’, Angelaki, 22:2, pp. 135–50.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Yue, Genevieve (2015), ‘Kitchen sink cinema: Artist-run film laboratories’, Film Comment, 30 March, https://www.filmcomment.com/blog/artist-run-film-laboratories/. Accessed 31 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Zielinski, Siegfried (1999), Audiovisions: Cinema and Television as Entr’actes in History (trans. G. Custance), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]