Skip to content
1981
Sensing Elementality
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471

Abstract

Since the 1970s, oceanographers have used underwater sound to measure ocean heat by means of a scientific technique called acoustic tomography (AT). This article historicizes AT, arguing that both the technique itself and the climatic knowledge it produces propagate colonial, military and capitalist pursuits that are to blame for oceanic warming in the first place. The argument plays out in four parts. Part one situates AT in relation to the discovery of the deep sound channel and Cold War acoustics research. Parts two and three analyse two pivotal AT experiments, namely the Heard Island Feasibility Test (1991) and the Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate experiment (1996–2006). Both experiments were premised on scientific understandings of the deep ocean as ‘nearly transparent to low-frequency sound’, as one oceanographer put it. We term this simplified image of the depths , after the nineteenth-century legal doctrine , which has long been deployed by settler colonists to justify violently expropriating land. We propose instead that the deep ocean should be conceptualized as a loud and sonically dense space – an – resonating not only with the sounds of ships’ propellers, air-guns and sonar pings, but also with the sonorous tones, clicks, buzzes, grunts and howls of manifold undersea creatures. The article concludes with a discussion of sound’s relation to ambiguity and violence in oceanographic knowledge production.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00120_1
2024-09-11
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, Sekula (1995), Fish Story, Rotterdam and Düsseldorf: Richter Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderman, Nicholas (2021), ‘Everything and nothing at all: A review of Capitalism and the Sea: The Maritime Factor in the Making of the Modern World by Liam Campling and Alejandro Colás’, Society & Space, 13 December, https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/everything-and-nothing-at-all. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderman, Nicholas (2022), ‘Notes on oceanic pharmacology: Nature, technics, time’, Media Theory, 6:2, pp. 159–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Balbi, Gabriele and Kittler, Juraj (2016), ‘One-to-one and one-to-many dichotomy: Grand theories, periodization, and historical narratives in communication studies’, International Journal of Communication, 10, pp. 1971–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benton, Lauren and Straumann, Benjamin (2010), ‘Acquiring empire by law: From Roman doctrine to early modern European practice’, Law and History Review, 28:1, pp. 1–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowles, Ann E. (2019), ‘Don’t muddy Walter Munk’s legacy’, Nature, 569:7756, p. 336.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowles, Ann E., Smultea, Mari, Würsig, Bernd, DeMaster, Douglas P. and Palka, Debra (1994), ‘Relative abundance and behavior of marine mammals exposed to transmissions from the Heard Island Feasibility Test’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96:4, pp. 2469–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Browne, Malcolm (1990), ‘Ocean loudspeakers to sound off for data on global warming’, New York Times, 6 November, p. C4.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Browne, Malcolm (1993), ‘Human noises in ocean held to threaten marine mammals’, New York Times, 19 October, p. C1.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Buttenfield, Barbara (1985), ‘Treatment of the cartographic line’, Cartographica, 22:2, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campling, Liam and Colás, Alejandro (2021), Capitalism and the Sea: The Maritime Factor in the Making of the Modern World, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chou, Emily, Southall, Brandon L., Robards, Martin and Rosenbaum, Howard C. (2021), ‘International policy, recommendations, actions and mitigation efforts of anthropogenic underwater noise’, Ocean & Coastal Management, 202, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cosgrove, Denis (1994), ‘Contested global visions: One-World, Whole-Earth, and the Apollo space photographs’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84:2, pp. 270–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Costa, D. P., Crocker, D. E., Waples, D. M., Webb, P. M., Gedamke, J., Houser, D., Goley, P. D., Le Boeuf, B. J. and Calambokidis, J. (1998), ‘The California marine mammal research program of the acoustic thermometry of ocean climate experiment’, in O. T. Magoon (ed.), California and the World Ocean 97: Taking a Look at California’s Ocean Resources: An Agenda for the Future, Reston, VI: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1542–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2007), Objectivity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. DeLoughrey, Elizabeth (2010), ‘Heavy waters: Waste and Atlantic modernity’, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 125:3, pp. 703–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DeLoughrey, Elizabeth (2017), ‘Submarine futures of the anthropocene’, Comparative Literature, 69:1, pp. 32–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunbar-Hester, Christina (2023), Oil Beach: How Toxic Infrastructure Threatens Life in the Ports of Los Angeles and Beyond, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dushaw, Brian D. (2010), ‘Acoustic thermometry of ocean climate’, The Heard Island Feasibility Test, University of Washington, https://staff.washington.edu/dushaw/heard/atoc/index.shtml. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dushaw, Brian D. (2022), ‘Surprises in physical oceanography: Contributions from ocean acoustic tomography’, Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 74:1, pp. 33–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dzieciuch, Matthew, Munk, Walter and Rudnick, Daniel L. (2004), ‘Propogation of sound through a spicy ocean, the SOFAR overture’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116:3, pp. 1447–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Edwards, Paul N. (1997), The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards, Paul N. (2010), A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Erbe, Christine, Marley, Sarah A., Schoeman, Renée P., Smith, Joshua N., Trigg, Leah E. and Embling, Clare Beth (2019), ‘The effects of ship noise on marine mammals: A review’, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, p. 606.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gillis, John R. (1989), The Militarization of the Western World, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Guan, Shane, Brookens, Tiffini and Vignola, Joseph (2021), ‘Use of underwater acoustics in marine conservation and policy: Previous advances, current status, and future needs’, in M. André and C. Erbe (eds), Ocean Noise: From Science to Management, Base: MDPI, pp. 405–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hackmann, Willem (1984), Seek and Strike: Sonar, Anti-Submarine Warfare and the Royal Navy, 1914–54, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Han, Lisa Y. (2021), ‘Sonic pipelines at the seafloor’, Media+Environment, 3:2, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives’, Feminist Studies 14:3, pp. 575–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Helmreich, Stefan (2007), ‘An anthropologist underwater: Immersive soundscapes, submarine cyborgs, and transductive ethnography’, American Ethnologist, 34:4, pp. 621–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Helmreich, Stefan (2023), A Book of Waves, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hendlin, Yogi Hale and International Association for Environmental Philosophy (2014), ‘From Terra Nullius to Terra Communis: Reconsidering wild land in an era of conservation and indigenous rights’, Environmental Philosophy, 11:2, pp. 141–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jue, Melody (2020a), Wild Blue Media: Thinking through Seawater, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jue, Melody (2020b), ‘Beyond terrestrial thinking: Oceans, estrangement, media’, ASLE blog, https://www.asle.org/features/beyond-terrestrial-thinking-oceans-estrangement-media/. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lehman, Jessica (2018), ‘From ships to robots: The social relations of sensing the world ocean’, Social Studies of Science, 48:1, pp. 57–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lehman, Jessica (2021), ‘Sea change: The world ocean circulation experiment and the productive limits of ocean variability’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46:4, pp. 839–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehman, Jessica and Johnson, Elizabeth (2022), ‘Environmental geography and the inheritance of western technoscience’, Progress in Environmental Geography, 1:1–4, pp. 23–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Liboiron, Max (2021), Pollution is Colonialism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Llewellyn-Jones, Malcolm (2006), The Royal Navy and Anti-Submarine Warfare, 1917–49, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lobo, Michele and Parsons, Meg (2023), ‘Decolonizing ocean spaces: Saltwater co-belonging and responsibilities’, Progress in Environmental Geography, 2:1–2, pp. 128–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mukerji, Chandra (1989), ‘Chapter three: War and state funding in the twentieth century’, in A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 39–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mulrennan, Monica and Scott, Colin (2002), ‘Mare Nullius: Indigenous rights in saltwater environments’, Development and Change, 31:3, pp. 681–708.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Munk, Walter (2000), Reimar Lüst Lecture (Listening to Ocean Climate), Hamburg: Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Munk, Walter (2006), ‘Ocean acoustic tomography: From a stormy start to an uncertain future’, in M. Jochum and R. Murtugudde (eds), Physical Oceanography: Developments Since 1950, Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 119–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Munk, Walter and Baggeroer, Arthur (1994), ‘The Heard Island papers: A contribution to global acoustics’, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96:4, pp. 2327–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Munk, Walter H., O’Reilly, W. C. and Reid, J. L. (1988), ‘Australia-Bermuda sound transmission experiment (1960) revisited’, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18:12, pp. 1876–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Munk, Walter, Bowles, Ann E. and Forbes, Andrew (1991), The Heard Island Science Daily, daily installment, the R/Vs Cory Chouest and Amy Chouest, Southern Ocean, 5 January–1 February, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Munk, Walter H., Spindel, Robert C., Baggeroer, Arthur and Birdsall, Theodore G. (1994), ‘The Heard Island Feasibility Test’, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96:4, pp. 2330–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Oreskes, Naomi (2021), Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Pauwels, Luc (2008), ‘An integrated model for conceptualising visual competence in scientific research and communication’, Visual Studies, 23:2, pp. 147–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Popper, Arthur N., Hawkins, Anthony D. and Thomsen, Frank (2020), ‘Taking the animals’ perspective regarding anthropogenic underwater sound’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 35:9, pp. 787–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Propen, Amy D. (2007), ‘Visual communication and the map: How maps as visual objects convey meaning in specific contexts’, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16:2, pp. 233–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Propen, Amy D. (2012), Locating Visual-Material Rhetorics: The Map, the Mill and the GPS, Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Reidy, Michael S. and Rozwadowski, Helen (2014), ‘The spaces in between: Science, ocean, empire’, Isis, 105:2, pp. 338–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ritts, Max (2017), ‘Amplifying environmental politics: Ocean noise’, Antipode, 49:5, pp. 1406–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Ritts, Max and Shiga, John (2016), ‘Military cetology’, Environmental Humanities, 8:2, pp. 196–214.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Roach Monroe, Linda (1991), ‘Sound wave tracked under ocean science’, Los Angeles Times, 2 February, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-02-02-mn-404-story.html. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ryan, Paul R. (1977), ‘A reader’s guide to underwater sound’, Oceanus, 20:2, pp. 3–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Shiga, John (2015), ‘Sonar and the channelization of the ocean’, in P. Théberge, K. Devine and T. Everrett (eds), Living Stereo: Histories of Cultures of Multichannel Sound, New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 85–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Shiga, John (2019), ‘The nuclear sensorium: Cold War nuclear imperialism and sensory violence’, Revue Canadienne Droit et Société (Canadian Journal of Law and Society), 34:2, pp. 281–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Shiga, John (2022), ‘Audible oceans: Sonar through the lens of Ursula Franklin’s “Technological Society”’, in K. Sikri, K. Mackinnon and L. Regan Shade (eds), What Would Ursula Franklin Say? (The McLuhan Centre for Culture and Technology Research Working Group: Reprising the Real World of Technology), Toronto: Humanities Commons, https://reprisingtherealworld.hcommons.org/what-would-ursula-franklin-say-collection/. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith, Jason W. (2018), To Master the Boundless Sea: The U.S. Navy, the Marine Environment, and the Cartography of Empire, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Starosielski, Nicole (2015), The Undersea Network, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ström, Timothy Erik (2023), ‘Blasted sea’, Sidecar, 22 September, https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/blasted-sea. Accessed 24 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Tsiouvalas, Apostolos (2020), ‘Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using ethnography to debate rights to marine resources in coastal Sámi communities of Troms’, The Yearbook of Polar Law Online, 11:1, pp. 245–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Von Storch, Hans and Hasselmann, Klaus (2010), Seventy Years of Exploration in Oceanography: A Prolonged Weekend Discussion with Walter Munk, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Weir, Gary (2001), An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Weir, Gary (2003), ‘From surveillance to global warming: John Steinberg and ocean acoustics’, International Journal of Naval History, 2:1, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Weir, Gary (2006), ‘The American sound surveillance system: Using the ocean to hunt Soviet submarines, 1950–1961’, International Journal of Naval History, 5:2, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00120_1
Loading
Deep-sea sound system: Scientific listening, ocean heat, colonial power
Journal of Environmental Media 5, 61 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00120_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00120_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00120_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): acoustic tomography; acoustics; climate; colonialism; oceanography; oceans; science

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test