Skip to content
1981
image of Only reflecting the industry or critical reporting? News coverage about sustainable finance in Germany

Abstract

With the increasing need to channel financial capital to reach the sustainable development goals, various actors (political, financial and NGOs) are trying to place their perspectives in the public sphere. Previous research has mainly focused on the coverage of climate change in the news media, whereas the financial aspect of transitioning our society to a net-zero future has often been overseen. This study manually content-analysed 479 news articles in Germany to find out about the main topics, actors and representation of sustainable finance (SF) in the news media. Findings show that media coverage has steadily increased since 2019, with a strong focus on European politics and political actors in Germany. Whereas differences across news outlets were identified, SF was overall mainly presented in a positive tone with advantageous characteristics, pointing out the positive performance of sustainable investments. The findings imply a predominance of neo-capitalistic representations of SF in the news that forego a more critical, differentiated and diversified discussion of the role of finance and the economy in transforming our society towards carbon-neutrality.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Marie Sklodowska-Curie Horizon 2020 Program (Award 834638)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00132_1
2024-10-03
2024-11-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armstrong, R. (2021), ‘The ESG investing industry is dangerous’, Financial Times, 24 August, https://www.ft.com/content/ec02fd5d-e8bd-45bd-b015-a5799ae820cf. Accessed 16 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F. and Rigobon, R. (2022), ‘Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings’, Review of Finance, 26:6, pp. 131544.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatti, S., Jones, B., Uppalapati, S. S. and Kristiansen, S. (2022), ‘Major media outlets and climate change action: Comparing US media coverage of the Green New Deal’, Environmental Communication, 16:3, pp. 31738.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bioy, H., Wang, B., Pucci, N., Carabia, A., Popat, S., Beaudoin, H., Mizuta, R. and Biddappa, A. R. (2024), ‘Global Sustainable Fund Flows: Q2 2024 in Review Recovery continues in Europe, but redemptions persist in other parts of the world’, Morningstar, 22 July, https://assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blt4eb669caa7dc65b2/blt18dd898943dd6d27/66abf0adb3480c965b14d575/Global_ESG_Flows_Q2_2024_Report_(2).pdf. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  5. Bohr, J. (2020), ‘Reporting on climate change: A computational analysis of U.S. newspapers and sources of bias, 1997–2017’, Global Environmental Change, 61, p. 102038.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bomberg, E. (2017), ‘Shale we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19:1, pp. 7288.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boykoff, M. T. (2007), ‘Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006’, Area, 39:4, pp. 47081.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boykoff, M. T. (2009), ‘We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34:1, pp. 43157.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boykoff, M. T. (2011), Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boykoff, M. T. and Yulsman, T. (2013), ‘Political economy, media, and climate change: Sinews of modern life’, WIREs Climate Change, 4:5, pp. 35971.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boykoff, M., Fernández-Reyes, R., Katzung, J., Nacu-Schmidt, A. and Pearman, O. (2024), ‘A review of media coverage of climate change and global warming in 2023’, Media and Climate Change Observatory, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/icecaps/research/media_coverage/summaries/special_issue_2023.html. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  12. Brüggemann, M. and Engesser, S. (2017), ‘Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change’, Global Environmental Change, 42, pp. 5867.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Buhr, K. and Hansson, A. (2011), ‘Capturing the stories of corporations: A comparison of media debates on carbon capture and storage in Norway and Sweden’, Global Environmental Change, 21:2, pp. 33645.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, M., Davis, W. M. and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2018), ‘Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets’, Nature, 557, pp. 54953.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BVI (2023), ‘Fokus Nachhaltigkeit: Der Nachhaltige Fondsmarkt im Dritten Quartal 2023’, 21 November, https://www.bvi.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Statistik/Research/2023_11_21_Fokus_Nachhaltigkeit__Q3_2023_.pdf. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  16. Chang, J. J. C., Kim, S. H., Shim, J. C. and Ma, D. H. (2016), ‘Who is responsible for climate change? Attribution of responsibility, news media, and South Koreans’ perceived risk of climate change’, Mass Communication and Society, 19:5, pp. 56684.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Climate Action 100+ (2021), ‘About Climate Action 100+’, Climate Action 100+, https://www.climateaction100.org/about/. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  18. Comfort, S. E., Tandoc, E. and Gruszczynski, M. (2019), ‘Who is heard in climate change journalism? Sourcing patterns in climate change news in China, India, Singapore, and Thailand’, Climatic Change, 158, pp. 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Corbett, J. B. and Durfee, J. L. (2004), ‘Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming’, Science Communication, 26:2, pp. 12951.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, A. (2005), ‘Media effect and the active elite audience: A study of communication in The London Stock Exchange’, European Journal of Communication, 20:3, pp. 30326.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis, A. (2006), ‘Media effects and the question of rational audience: Lessons from the financial markets’, Media, Culture & Society, 28:4, pp. 60325.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dimmelmeier, A. (2021), ‘Sustainable finance as a contested concept: Tracing the evolution of five frames between 1998 and 2018’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13:4, pp. 160023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Diprose, K., Fern, R., Vanderbeck, R. M., Chen, L., Valentine, G., Liu, C. and McQuadi, K. (2018), ‘Corporations, consumerism and culpability: Sustainability in the British Press’, Environmental Communication, 12:5, pp. 67285.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dolšak, N. and Houston, K. (2013), ‘Global climate change and the media: Newspaper coverage and climate change legislative activity across U.S. states’, Global Policy, 5:3, pp. 28697.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Donnison, C. L., Trdlicova, K., Mohr, A. and Taylor, G. (2023), ‘A net-zero storyline for success? News media analysis of the legitimacy of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the United Kingdom’, Energy Research & Social Science, 102, p. 103153.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Doulton, H. and Brown, K. (2009), ‘Ten years to prevent catastrophe?’, Global Environmental Change, 19:2, pp. 191202.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dumas, C. and Louche, C. (2016), ‘Collective beliefs on responsible investment’, Business & Society, 55:3, pp. 42757.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Eccles, R. G. (2021), ‘Seven principles for ESG investing: A conversation with Desiree Fixler’, Forbes, 19 September, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2021/09/19/seven-principles-for-esg-investing-a-conversation-with-desiree-fixler/?sh=7a33279e6011. Accessed 19 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. European Commission (2018), ‘Financing a sustainable European economy: Final report 2018 by the High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance Secretariat provided by the European Commission’, January, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/180131-sustainable-finance-final-report_en.pdf. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  30. European Commission (2021), ‘Overview of sustainable finance’, https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  31. Evans, S. (2021), ‘Analysis: Which countries are historically responsible for climate change’, Carbon Brief, 5 October, https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  32. Fatin, L. (2021), ‘Nordic sustainable debt state of the market 2020: Special regional report: Nordics at 5% of global GSS markets’, Climate Bonds Initiative, 20 April, https://www.climatebonds.net/2021/04/nordic-sustainable-debt-state-market-2020-special-regional-report. Accessed 19 August 2024.
  33. Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., Ragland, C. J., Melnick, L. L., Chaudhry, R., Hall, D. M., Peterson, T. R., Stephens, J. C. and Wilson, E. J. (2013), ‘Spreading the news on carbon capture and storage: A state-level comparison of US media’, Environmental Communication, 7:3, pp. 33654.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. and Garcia-Bernardo, J. (2017), ‘Hidden power of the big three? Passive index funds, re-concentration of corporate ownership, and new financial risk’, Business and Politics, 19:2, pp. 298326.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Flynn, C., Jardon, S.T., Fisher, S., Blayney, M., Ward, A., Smith, H., Struthoff, P. and Fillingham, Z. (2021), ‘The peoples’ climate vote’, UNDP, 20 June, https://www.undp.org/publications/peoples-climate-vote. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  36. Galaz, V., Crona, B., Dauriach, A., Scholtens, B. and Steffen, W. (2018), ‘Finance and the Earth system: Exploring the links between financial actors and non-linear changes in the climate system’, Global Environmental Change, 53, pp. 296302.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gustafson, A., Rosenthal, S. A., Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Bergquist, P., Kotcher, J. E., Maibach, E. W. and Leiserowitz, A. (2019), ‘The development of partisan polarization over the Green New Deal’, Nature Climate Change, 9, pp. 94044.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Habermas, J. (2006), ‘Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research’, Communication Theory, 16:4, pp. 41126.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hansen, A. (2010), Environment, Media and Communication, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hase, V., Mahl, D., Schäfer, M. S. and Keller, T. R. (2021), ‘Climate change in news media across the globe: An automated analysis of issue attention and themes in climate change coverage in 10 countries (2006–2018)’, Global Environmental Change, 70, p. 102353.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hayes, S. and O’Neill, S. (2021), ‘The Greta effect: Visualising climate protest in UK media and the Getty images collections’, Global Environmental Change, 71, p. 102392.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. IMF (2021), ‘A guide to committees, groups, and clubs’, https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/A-Guide-to-Committees-Groups-and-Clubs#G7. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  43. Knowles, S., Philips, G. and Lidberg, J. (2017), ‘Reporting the global financial crisis’, Journalism Studies, 18:3, pp. 32240.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, M. (2014), ‘A review of communication scholarship on the financial markets and the financial media’, International Journal of Communication, 8, pp. 71536.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Maeseele, P. and Raeijmaekers, D. (2020), ‘Nothing on the news but the establishment blues? Toward a framework of depoliticization and agonistic media pluralism’, Journalism, 21:11, pp. 1593610.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Manning, P. (2012), ‘Financial journalism, news sources and the banking crisis’, Journalism, 14:2, pp. 17389.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McCombs, M. E. and Shaw, D. L. (1972), ‘The agenda setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36:2, pp. 17687.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. McIntyre, K. E. and Lough, K. (2021), ‘Toward a clearer conceptualization and operationalization of solutions journalism’, Journalism, 22:6, pp. 155873.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T. and Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2016), ‘Perceptions of climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria’, Science Communication, 38:2, pp. 197227.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Morris, H. E. (2021), ‘Constructing the millennial “other” in United States press coverage of the Green New Deal’, Environmental Communication, 15:1, pp. 13343.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mouffe, C. (2002), ‘Politics and passions: Introduction’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 28:6, pp. 61516.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S. and Nielsen, K. (2020), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nisbet, M. C. and Myers, T. (2007), ‘Twenty years of public opinion about global warming’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 71:3, pp. 44470.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Neill, S. J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S. and Day, S. A. (2013), ‘On the use of imagery for climate change engagement’, Global Environmental Change, 23:2, pp. 41321.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Neill, S. J., Williams, H., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B. and Boykoff, M. (2015), ‘Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report’, Nature Climate Change, 5, pp. 38085.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Paetzold, F. and Busch, T. (2014), ‘Unleashing the powerful few: Sustainable investing behavior of wealthy private investors’, Organization & Environment, 27:4, pp. 34767.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Painter, J., Ettinger, J., Doutreix, M. N., Strauß, N., Wonneberger, A. and Walton, P. (2021), ‘Is it climate change? Coverage by online news sites of the 2019 European summer heatwaves in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK’, Climatic Change, 169:4, pp. 128.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Painter, J., Ettinger, J., Holmes, D., Loy, L., Pinto, J., Richardson, L., Thomas-Walters, L., Vowles, K. and Wetts, R. (2023), ‘Climate delay discourses present in global mainstream television coverage of the IPCC’s 2021 report’, Communications Earth Environment, 4, p. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Painter, J., Kristiansen, S. and Schäfer, M. S. (2018), ‘How “digital-born” media cover climate change in comparison to legacy media: A case study of the COP 21 summit in Paris’, Global Environmental Change, 48, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Pathak, M., Roy, J., Patel, S., Some, S., Vyas, P., Das, N. and Shukla, P. (2021), ‘Communicating climate change findings from IPCC reports: Insights from outreach events in India’, Climatic Change, 168, p. 23.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Robbins, D. and Wheatley, D. (2021), ‘Complexity, objectivity, and shifting roles: Environmental correspondents march to a changing beat’, Journalism Practice, 15:9, pp. 1289306.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Saldanha, R. (2022), ‘The rise of anti-ESG shareholder proposals’, Morning Star, 1 April, https://www.morningstar.ca/ca/news/220000/the-rise-of-anti-esg-shareholder-proposals.aspx. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  63. Sanford, M., Painter, J., Yasseri, T. and Lorimer, J. (2021), ‘Controversy around climate change reports: A case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land’, Climatic Change, 167, p. 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schäfer, M. S. and Painter, J. (2021), ‘Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12:1, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Schäfer, M. S. and Schlichting, I. (2014), ‘Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field’, Environmental Communication, 8:2, pp. 14260.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A. and Schäfer, M. S. (2013), ‘Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries’, Global Environmental Change, 23:5, pp. 123348.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Seijo, M. (2020), ‘Governing media information through a Green New Deal: History, theory, practice’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:2, pp. 20924.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. ShareAction (2020), ‘Voting matters 2020: Are asset managers using their proxy votes for action on climate and social issues?’, 15 December, https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2020-are-asset-managers-using-their-proxy-votes-for-action-on-climate-and-social-issues. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  69. ShareAction (2021), ‘New research puts big banks’ sustainability claims in doubt’, 6 September, https://shareaction.org/news/new-research-puts-big-banks-sustainability-claims-in-doubt. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  70. Shoemaker, P. J. and Reese, S. D. (1996), Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, White Plains, NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Starkman, D. (2014), The Watchdog that Didn’t Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Strauß, N. (2015), ‘German financial media’s responsiveness to Deutsche Bank’s cultural change’, Public Relations Review, 41:5, pp. 43537.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Strauß, N. (2019), ‘Financial journalism in today’s high-frequency news and information era’, Journalism, 20:2, pp. 27491.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Strauß, N. (2021), ‘Devil’s advocate or agenda setter? The role of journalists covering sustainable finance in Europe’, Journalism Studies, 22:9, pp. 120018.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Strauß, N. (2022), ‘Covering sustainable finance: Role perceptions, journalistic practices and moral dilemmas’, Journalism, 23:6, pp. 1194212.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Strauß, N. (2023), ‘Framing sustainable finance: A critical analysis of op-eds in the financial times’, International Journal of Business Communication, 60:4, pp. 142740.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Strauß, N., Painter, J., Ettinger, J., Doutreix, M.-N., Wonneberger, A. and Walton, P. (2022), ‘Reporting on the 2019 European heatwaves and Climate Change: Journalists’ attitudes, motivations and role perceptions’, Journalism Practice, 16:2–3, pp. 46285.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Tambini, D. (2010), ‘What are financial journalists for?’, Journalism Studies, 11:2, pp. 15874.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Thompson, P. A. (2009), ‘Market manipulation? Applying the propaganda model to financial media reporting’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 6:2, pp. 7396.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Thompson, P. A. (2013), ‘Invested interests? Reflexivity, representation and reporting in financial markets’, Journalism, 14:2, pp. 20827.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. UK Government Green Financing Framework (2021), ‘UK Government Green Financing’, June, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-government-green-financing#:~:text=Details,support%20jobs%20in%20green%20sectors. Accessed 27 August 2024.
  82. UN (2024), ‘COP26 Day 4: Mobilizing the money’, https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/cop26-day-4-mobilizing-money. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  83. United Nations (2021), ‘Goal 13 climate action’, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals#climate-action. Accessed 16 August 2024.
  84. Usher, N. (2013), ‘Ignored, uninterested, and the blame game: How the New York Times, Marketplace, and TheStreet distanced themselves from preventing the 2007–2009 financial crisis’, Journalism, 14:2, pp. 190207.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Usher, N. (2017), ‘Making business news: A production analysis of the New York Times’, International Journal of Communication, 11, pp. 36382.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Van Aelst, P. and Walgrave, S. (2011), ‘Minimal or massive? The political agenda-setting power of the mass media according to different methods’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16:3, pp. 295313.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. van Atteveldt, W., van der Velden, M. A. C. G. and Boukes, M. (2021), ‘The validity of sentiment analysis: Comparing manual annotation, crowd-coding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms’, Communication Methods and Measures, 15:2, pp. 12140.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Vu, H. T., Liu, Y. and Tran, D. V. (2019), ‘Nationalizing a global phenomenon: A study of how the press in 45 countries and territories portrays climate change’, Global Environmental Change, 58, p. 101942.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Walgrave, S., Boydstun, A. E., Vliegenthart, R. and Hardy, A. (2017), ‘The nonlinear effect of information on political attention: Media storms and U.S. Congressional hearings’, Political Communication, 34:4, pp. 54870.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Williams, A. (2015), ‘Environmental news journalism, public relations and news sources’, in A. Hansen and R. Cox (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 197206.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Williams, L. and Sovacool, B. K. (2019), ‘The discursive politics of “fracking”: Frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom’, Global Environmental Change, 58, p. 101935.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Wonneberger, W. and Vliegenthart, R. (2021), ‘Agenda-setting effects of climate change litigation: Interrelations across issue levels, media, and politics in the case of Urgenda against the Dutch government’, Environmental Communication, 15:5, pp. 699714.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Laws, A. L. S. (2020), ‘Can immersive journalism enhance empathy?’, Digital Journalism, 8:2, pp. 21328.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00132_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00132_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error