Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Environmental Media
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471

Abstract

Despite limitations and uncertainties, digital media platforms are integral to mobilization and organizing in the climate movement. Their appeal and utility for public engagement is largely attributed to direct interactions among users, increased visibility, and the ability to measure and validate these interactions through quantified engagement metrics. While the affordances of specific platforms and their influence on social movements have been extensively studied in existing scholarship, the relationship between engagement metrics and climate activism requires further attention. Therefore, this article focuses on the relationship between ubiquitous engagement metrics on digital media platforms and digital organizers in the climate movement. It highlights the different kinds of internal and external stakes for digital climate activists as well as the challenges and compromises that occur when platform affordances – especially their tendency to flatten and quantify interactions – come to be entwined with organizing. The article suggests that future scholarship needs to look beyond perspectives that exclusively emphasize either the technical hostility of platforms or the interpretative flexibility of users that currently define scholarly understanding of the relationship between metrics and users. This can be achieved by paying greater attention to sociopolitical conditions, such as internet access, regulatory frameworks and national climate politics that influence the experiences of digital organizers in the climate movement. These insights can support strategies relevant to different regional, technical and temporal constraints that are so crucial to achieving effective climate action.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00133_1
2024-12-31
2025-03-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baym, Nancy K. (2013), ‘Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics’, First Monday, 18:10, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4873.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolin, Göran and Velkova, Julia (2020), ‘Audience-metric continuity?: Approaching the meaning of measurement in the digital everyday’, Media, Culture & Society, 42:7–8, pp. 1193–209, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720907017.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bucher, Taina (2012), ‘Want to be on the top?: Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook’, New Media & Society, 14:7, pp. 1164–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Callison, Candis (2014), How Climate Change Comes to Matter: The Communal Life of Facts, Experimental Futures, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376064.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, Donald T. (1979), ‘Assessing the impact of planned social change’, Evaluation and Program Planning, 2:1, pp. 67–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Christin, Angèle and Lewis, Rebecca (2021), ‘The drama of metrics: Status, spectacle, and resistance among YouTube drama creators’, Social Media + Society, 7:1, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121999660.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Christin, Angèle and Petre, Caitlin (2020), ‘Making peace with metrics: Relational work in online news production’, Sociologica, 14:2, pp. 133–56, https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11178.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dencik, Lina and Leistert, Oliver (2015), Critical Perspectives on Social Media and Protest: Between Control and Emancipation, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Doyle, Julie (2007), ‘Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication’, Science as Culture, 16:2, pp. 129–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Espeland, Wendy N. and Stevens, Mitchell L. (2008), ‘A sociology of quantification’, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 49:3, pp. 401–36, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerlitz, Carolin and Helmond, Anne (2013), ‘The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web’, New Media & Society, 15:8, pp. 1348–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodhart, Charles (1979), Monetary Theory and Practice, London: Red Globe Press, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Grosser, Benjamin (2014), ‘What do metrics want?: How quantification prescribes social interaction on Facebook’, Computational Culture, 4, n.pag., http://computationalculture.net/what-do-metrics-want/. Accessed 20 February 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Milan, Stefania (2015), ‘When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting’, Social Media+ Society, 1:2, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622481.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Milan, Stefania (2018), ‘The materiality of clouds: Beyond a platform-specific critique of contemporary activism’, in M. Mortensen, C. Neumayer and T. Poell (eds), Social Media Materialities and Protest, London: Routledge, pp. 116–28, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127028.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchell, Liam (2015), ‘Karmic cascades: Ranking content and conditioning thought on reddit.com’, Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 19:1, pp. 69–91, https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20154228.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Porter, Theodore M. (1996), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821617.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Rudiak-Gould, Peter (2013), ‘“We Have Seen It with Our Own Eyes”: Why we disagree about climate change visibility’, Weather, Climate, and Society, 5:2, pp. 120–32, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00034.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Stone, Deborah A. (2021), Counting: How We Use Numbers to Decide What Matters, New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Swarnakar, Pradip (2019), ‘Climate change, civil society, and social movement in India’, in N. K. Dubash (ed.), India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–72, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199498734.001.0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Tufekci, Zeynep (2017), Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00133_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): climate action; digital organizing; engagement metrics; Greenpeace; platforms; political economy; sociology of quantification

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test