Skip to content
1981
image of Docking the digital network: Ports as digital media infrastructures

Abstract

Ports connect industries across the world as a site for the exchange of commodities, and their operation has negative effects on the environment. While many ports have developed plans for sustainability, they are largely structured according to their marine economy and governance model. Through concession agreements and incentive programmes, many companies have invested in onshore power supply (OPS) technology to connect to the landside grid and minimize pollution while their vessels are docked. In an effort to address sustainability, the telecommunications sector has also invested in OPS. This is because the backbone of our global internet is installed, maintained and repaired by a fuel-intensive marine fleet that uses ports. In order for ports to optimize their sustainability efforts, they should approach this endeavour according to their functional connectivity across infrastructures, a framework I refer to as docking. The phrase ‘docking the digital network’ specifically designates the application of this framework to describe the environmental impact resulting from the infrastructural relationship within the port–subsea cable–cable ship media system. By analysing industry reports and interviews, this article argues that ports are digital media infrastructures. Through docking, media studies scholarship can address questions of sustainability using a relational approach for infrastructures of mediation with potential avenues for environmental justice.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00145_1
2026-01-07
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Accenture Strategy and Global e-Sustainability Initiative (2015), #SMARTer 2030: ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges, Brussels: Global e-Sustainability Initiative.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsenault, S. (2022), email to N. Starosielski, 13 October.
  3. Brodie, P. (2020), ‘Climate extraction and supply chains of data’, Media, Culture & Society, 42:7&8, pp. 1095–114, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720904601.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks, M. R. and Pallis, A. A. (2008), ‘Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components’, Maritime Policy & Management, 35:4, pp. 411–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802215060.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, M. R. and Pallis, A. A. (2011), ‘Port governance’, in W. K. Talley (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 491–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooks, M. R., Cullinane, P. B. and Pallis, A. A. (2017), ‘Revisiting port governance and port reform: A multi-country examination’, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 22:1, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.02.005.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. California ARB (Air Resources Board) (2019), ‘Portside environmental justice neighborhoods’, California Air Resources Board, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/capp/com/cip/portside-environmental-justice-neighborhoods. Accessed 7 February 2025.
  8. Cho, M., Dickinson, K., Furuhata, Y., Keidl, P. D., Neves, J. and Steinberg, M. (2017), ‘Home page’, Porting Media, https://portingmedia.wordpress.com. Accessed 24 January 2025.
  9. Chua, C. (2015), ‘The quiet port is logistics’ nightmare’, The Disorder of Things, 19 January, https://thedisorderofthings.com/2015/01/19/the-quiet-port-is-logistics-nightmare. Accessed 24 January 2025.
  10. Colgan, C. S. (2013), ‘The ocean economy of the United States: Measurement, distribution, & trends’, Ocean & Coastal Management, 71:1, pp. 334–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.018.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowen, D. (2014), The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cubitt, S., Hassan, R. and Volkmer, I. (2011), ‘Does cloud computing have a silver lining?’, Media, Culture & Society, 33:1, pp. 149–58, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710382974.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunbar-Hester, C. (2023), Oil Beach: How Toxic Infrastructure Threatens Life in the Ports of Los Angeles and Beyond, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ‘dock (n.3)’ (2024), Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/dock_n3?tab=meaning_and_use#6344945. Accessed 30 September 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Efoui-Hess, M. (2019), Climate Crisis: The Unsustainable Use of Online Video, Paris: The Shift Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferreboeuf, H. (2019), Lean ICT: Towards Digital Sobriety, Paris: The Shift Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gonzalez Monserrate, S. (2022), ‘The cloud is material: On the environmental impacts of computation and data storage’, MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing, 1:4, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.031d4553.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Government of Canada (2024), ‘Gross domestic product by sector and year’, Canada.ca, 12 December, https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/stats/maritime/tab/mar-tab1-eng.htm. Accessed 11 June 2025.
  19. Greenberg, M. R. (2021), ‘Ports and environmental justice in the United States: An exploratory statistical analysis’, Risk Analysis, 41:11, pp. 2112–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13697.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Greer, F., Bin Thaneya, A. and Horvath, A. (2024), ‘Environmental justice and systems analysis for air quality planning in the port of Oakland in California’, Environmental Science & Technology, 58:19, pp. 8135–48, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07728.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grzeskowitz, T. (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 24 May.
  22. Gutierrez-Romero, J. E., Esteve-Pérez, J. and Zamora, B. (2019), ‘Implementing onshore power supply from renewable energy sources for requirements of ships at berth’, Applied Energy, 255:1, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113883.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, L. (2024), Deepwater Alchemy: Extractive Mediation and the Taming of the Seafloor, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Koomey, J. and Masanet, E. (2021), ‘Does not compute: Avoiding pitfalls assessing the internet’s energy and carbon impacts’, Joule, 5:7, pp. 1625–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kronfeld-Goharani, U. (2018), ‘Maritime economy: Insights on corporate visions and strategies towards sustainability’, Ocean and Coastal Management, 165, pp. 126–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.010.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Makonin, S., Marks, L., Przedpełski, R. and Rodriguez-Silva, A. (2022), ‘Calculating the carbon footprint of streaming media: Beyond the myth of efficiency’, Eighth Workshop on Computing with Limits, 21–22 June, https://makonin.com/doc/LIMITS_2022.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2025.
  27. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A. and Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020), ‘Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review’, Frontiers in Public Health, 8, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Mattern, S. (2021), ‘The pulse of global passage: Listening to logistics’, in M. Hockenberry, N. Starosielski and S. Zieger (eds), Assembly Codes: The Logistics of Media, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 75–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McKelvey, F. and Piebiak, J. (2016), ‘Porting the political campaign: The NationBuilder platform and the global flows of political technology’, New Media & Society, 20:3, pp. 901–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675439.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Moldanová, J., Hassellöv, I., Matthias, V., Fridell, E., Jalkanen, J., Ytreberg, E., Quante, M., Troltzch, J., Maljutenko, I., Raudsepp, U. and Eriksson, K. M. (2022), ‘Framework for the environmental impact assessment of operational shipping’, Ambio, 51, pp. 754–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Neilson, B., Rossiter, N. and Samaddar, R. (2018), Logistical Asia: The Labour of Making a World Region, Cham: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Neilson-Watts, B. (2022), online interview with N. Starosielski, 10 October.
  33. Nogué-Algueró, B. (2020), ‘Growth in the docks: Ports, metabolic flows, and socio-environmental impacts’, Sustainability Science, 15, pp. 11–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00764-y.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2025), The Ocean Economy to 2050, Paris: OECD Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Pacific Environment (n.d.), ‘Home page’, Ports for People, https://portsforpeople.pacificenvironment.org. Accessed 11 June 2025.
  36. Parks, L. and Starosielski, N. (2015), Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pasek, A. (2019), ‘Managing carbon and data flows: Fungible forms of mediation in the cloud’, Culture Machine, 18, pp. 1–24, https://www.easst.net/article/the-environmental-footprint-of-social-media-hosting-tinkering-with-mastodon. Accessed 20 September 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Patrick, C. J. (2009), ‘Ballast water law: Invasive species and twenty-five years of ineffective legislation’, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 27:1, pp. 67–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rise St James Louisiana (2025), ‘Home’, https://risestjames.org. Accessed 11 June 2025.
  40. Roberts, T., Williams, I., Preston, J., Clarke, N., Odum, M. and O’Gorman, S. (2023), ‘Ports in a storm: Port-city environmental challenges and solutions’, Sustainability, 15:12, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129722.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rossiter, N. (2016), Software, Infrastructure, Labor: A Media Theory of Logistical Nightmares, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Shi, Z., Endres, S., Rutgerson, A., Al-Hajjaji, S., Brynolf, S., Booge, D., Hassellöv, I., Kontovas, C., Kumar, R., Liu, H., Marandino, C., Matthias, V., Moldanová, J., Salo, K., Sebe, M., Yi, W., Yang, M. and Zhang, C. (2023), ‘Perspectives on shipping emissions and their impacts on the surface ocean and lower atmosphere: An environmental-social-economic dimension’, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 11:1, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Slack, B. (1993), ‘Pawns in the game: Ports in a global transportation system’, Growth and Change, 24:4, pp. 579–88, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1993.tb00138.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Starosielski, N. (2015), The Undersea Network, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Starosielski, N., Vaughan, H., Pasek, A. and Silcox, N. R. (2023), ‘Disaggregated footprints: An infrastructural literacy approach to the sustainable internet’, in A. López, A. Ivakhiv, S. Rust, M. Tola, A. Y. Chang and K. Chu (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Ecomedia Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 111–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Stephenson, N. (1996), ‘Mother Earth mother board’, Wired, 1 December, https://www.wired.com/1996/12/ffglass. Accessed 30 January 2025.
  47. Surís-Regueiro, J. C., Garza-Gil, M. D. and Varela-Lafuente, M. M. (2013), ‘Marine economy: A proposal for its definition in the European Union’, Marine Policy, 42, pp. 111–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.02.010.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Vasula, A. (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 12 May.
  49. Ytreberg, E., Astrom, S. and Fridell, E. (2021), ‘Valuating environmental impacts from ship emissions: The marine perspective’, Journal of Environmental Management, 282:1, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111958.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Zayas, A. (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 4 May.
  51. Zhang, Q., Zheng, S., Geerlings, H. and El Makhloufi, A. (2019), ‘Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?’, Transport Policy, 77, pp. 46–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.03.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Anonymous interviewee from American Association of Port Authorities (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 21 April.
  53. Anonymous interviewee from European Sea Ports Organisation (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez.
  54. Anonymous interviewee from Port of Antwerp (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 16 May.
  55. Anonymous interviewee from Port of Barcelona (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 13 May.
  56. Anonymous interviewee from Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles (2022), telephone interview with G. N. Ramirez, 2 June.
  57. Anonymous interviewee from Port of Miami (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 12 May.
  58. Anonymous interviewee from Port of  Veracruz (2022), online interview with G. N. Ramirez, 12 May.
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00145_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keywords: cable ships ; industry ; subsea cables ; internetsustainability ; mitigation ; governance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test