Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Fandom Studies, The
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2046-6692
  • E-ISSN: 2046-6706

Abstract

In the present article we discuss three studies aimed at better understanding elitism in the context of fan groups. The studies assess different facets of elitism, predictors of elitism and the potential outcomes associated with holding elitist beliefs. The survey studies were conducted on members of three distinct fan groups: furries (fans of media featuring anthropomorphized animal characters), bronies (adult fans of the television series ) and anime fans (fans of Japanese animation). Elitism was found to include both self-inflation and other-derogation and is predicted by two components of fan identity (fanship and fandom). Elitism was also significantly associated with pro-gatekeeping attitudes and behaviours. Practical and theoretical implications for fan culture are discussed. We also discuss the limitations of the studies and their ability to contribute to a discussion about creating inclusive fan spaces.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
2020-06-01
2025-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, D.,, Wetherell, M.,, Cochrane, S., and Hogg, M.. ( 1990;), ‘ Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. ’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 29:2, pp. 67–119, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2372667. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronson, E., and Mills, J.. ( 1959;), ‘ The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. ’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59:2, pp. 177–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashforth, B. E.,, Harrison, S. H., and Corley, K. G.. ( 2008;), ‘ Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. ’, Journal of Management, 34:3, pp. 325–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumeister, R., and Leary, M.. ( 1995;), ‘ The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. ’, Psychological Bulletin, 117:3, pp. 497–529.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bushman, B. J., and Anderson, C. A.. ( 2002;), ‘ Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. ’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28:12, pp. 1679–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Buunk, A. P.,, Gibbons, F. X., and Visser, A.. ( 2002;), ‘ The relevance of social comparison processes for prevention and health care. ’, Patient Education and Counseling, 47:1, pp. 1–3, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12023094. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M.. ( 2000;), ‘ The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. ’, Psychological Inquiry, 11:4, pp. 227–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Diegel, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ 5 NFL teams with the most annoying bandwagon fans. ’, Bleacher Report, 30 November, https://bleacherreport.com/articles/961905-xx-nlf-teams-with-the-most-annoying-bandwagon-fans. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Doosje, B.,, Ellemers, N., and Spears, R.. ( 1995;), ‘ Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. ’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31:5, pp. 410–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunlap, K., and Wolf, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Fans behaving badly: Anime metafandom, brutal criticism, and the intellectual fan. ’, Mechademia, 5, pp. 267–83, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/400561/pdf. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dweck, C. S.. ( 2006), Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, New York:: Random House;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards, P.,, Chadborn, D. P.,, Plante, C.,, Reysen, S., and Redden, M.. ( 2019), Meet the Bronies: The Psychology of Adult Fans of My Little Pony, Jefferson, NC:: McFarland Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Eidelman, S., and Biernat, M.. ( 2002;), ‘ Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection?. ’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39:6, pp. 601–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fehr, E., and Gächter, S.. ( 2000;), ‘ Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. ’, American Economic Review, 90:4, pp. 980–94, https://ssrn.com/abstract=222388. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flanagan, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ What’s wrong with you? Making fun of cosplay. ’, iFanboy, 7 October, https://ifanboy.com/articles/whats-wrong-with-you-making-fun-of-cosplay/. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerbasi, K. C.,, Paolone, N.,, Higner, J.,, Scaletta, L. L.,, Bernstein, P. L.,, Conway, S., and Privatera, A.. ( 2008;), ‘ Furries from A to Z (anthropomorphism to zoomorphism). ’, Society and Animals, 16:3, pp. 197–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunderson, E. A.,, Ramirez, G.,, Levine, S. C., and Beilock, S. L.. ( 2012;), ‘ The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. ’, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 66:3&4, pp. 153–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Handley, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ “Distressing damsels”: Narrative critique and reinterpretation in Star Wars fanfiction. ’, in K. Larsen, and L. Zubernis. (eds), Fan Culture: Theory/Practice, Newcastle upon Tyne:: Cambridge Scholars Publishing;, pp. 97–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hellekson, K.. ( 2010;), ‘ History, the trace, and fandom wank. ’, in H. Urbanski. (ed.), Writing and the Digital Generation: Essays on New Media Rhetoric, Jefferson, NC:: McFarland & Company Inc;, pp. 58–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hogg, M. A.,, Turner, J. C., and Davidson, B.. ( 1990;), ‘ Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. ’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11:1, pp. 77–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenkins, H.. ( 1992), Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jetten, J.,, Spears, R., and Manstead, A.. ( 1996;), ‘ Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71:6, pp. 1222–33, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8979388. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein, N., and Epley, N.. ( 2017;), ‘ Less evil than you: Bounded self-righteousness in character inferences, emotional reactions, and behavioral extremes. ’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43:8, pp. 1202–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mackie, D. M.. ( 1986;), ‘ Social identification effects in group polarization. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:4, pp. 21–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mackie, D. M., and Cooper, J.. ( 1984;), ‘ Attitude polarization: Effects of group membership. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46:3, pp. 575–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Matthias, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Meet Emma the tiger: A showcase of fandom love from BLFC 2018. ’, Dogpatch Press , 16 May, https://dogpatch.press/tag/emma. Accessed 31 May 2019.
  27. Mock, S. E.,, Plante, C. N.,, Reysen, S., and Gerbasi, K. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Deeper leisure involvement as a coping resource in a stigmatized leisure context. ’, Leisure/Loisir, 37:2, pp. 111–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Morse, S., and Gergen, K.. ( 1970;), ‘ Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16:1, pp. 148–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ojala, K., and Nesdale, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ Bullying and social identity: The effects of group norms and distinctiveness threat on attitudes toward bullying. ’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22:1, pp. 19–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Patten, F.. ( 2015;), ‘ The history of furry publishing. ’, in T. Howl. (ed.), Essays on Furries by the Most Prominent Members of the Furry Fandom, Nashville:: Thurston Howl Publications;, pp. 35–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Patten, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Comment: Meet Emma the tiger: A showcase of fandom love from BLFC 2018. ’, Dogpatch Press , 16 May, https://dogpatch.press/2018/05/16/meet-emma-the-tiger-blfc/#more-49325. Accessed 31 May 2019.
  32. Plante, C. N.,, Reysen, S.,, Roberts, S., and Gerbasi, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ “Welcome to the jungle”: Content creators and fan entitlement in the furry fandom. ’, Journal of Fandom Studies, 5:1, pp. 63–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Plante, C.,, Roberts, S.,, Reysen, S., and Gerbasi, K. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ “One of us”: Engagement with fandoms and global citizenship identification. ’, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3:1, pp. 49–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Plante, C. N.,, Roberts, S. E.,, Reysen, S., and Gerbasi, K. C.. ( 2015;), ‘ “By the numbers”: Comparing furries and related fandoms. ’, in T. Howl. (ed.), Essays on Furries by the Most Prominent Members of the Fandom, Nashville, TN:: Thurston Howl Publications;, pp. 106–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F.. ( 2008;), ‘ Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. ’, Behavior Research Methods, 40, pp. 879–91, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18697684. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Preacher, K. J., and MacCallum, R. C.. ( 2003;), ‘ Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. ’, Understanding Statistics, 2:1, pp. 13–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Reysen, S., and Branscombe, N. R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Fanship and fandom: Comparisons between sport fans and non-sport fans. ’, Journal of Sport Behavior, 33:2, pp. 176–93, https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-09707-004. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Reysen, S.,, Katzarska-Miller, I.,, Nesbit, S. M., and Pierce, L.. ( 2013;), ‘ Further validation of a single-item measure of social identification. ’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 43:6, pp. 463–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Reysen, S.,, Plante, C., and Chadborn, D.. ( 2017;), ‘ Better together: Social connections mediate the relationship between fandom and well-being. ’, AASCIT Journal of Health, 4:6, pp. 68–73, http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive2?journalId=972&paperId=5896. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Reysen, S.,, Plante, C. N.,, Roberts, S. E.,, Gerbasi, K. C.,, Mohebpour, I., and Gamboa, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Pale and geeky: Prevailing stereotypes of anime fans. ’, Phoenix Papers, 2:1, pp. 78–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Reysen, S., and Shaw, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Sport fan as the default fan: Why non-sport fans are stigmatized. ’, Phoenix Papers, 2:1, pp. 234–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, S. E.,, Plante, C. N.,, Gerbasi, K. C., and Reysen, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Clinical interaction with anthropomorphic phenomenon: Notes for health professionals about interacting with clients who possess this unusual identity. ’, Health and Social Work, 40:2, pp. e42–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Scott, S.. ( 2019), Fake Geek Girls: Fandom, Gender, and the Convergence Culture Industry, New York:: New York University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Shirky, C.. ( 2003;), ‘ A group is its own worst enemy. ’, Clay Shirky’s Writings about the Internet , 1 July, http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html. Accessed 31 May 2019.
  45. Sterling, J.. [Jim Sterling] ( 2019;), ‘ A difficult subject (The Jimquisition). ’, YouTube , 15 April, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIWivb-8C1w. Accessed 31 May 2019.
  46. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C.. ( 1979;), ‘ An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. ’, in W. Austin, and S. Worchel. (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA:: Brooks and Cole;, pp. 33–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thorson, K., and Wells, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. ’, in T. Vos, and F. Heinderyckx. (eds), Gatekeeping in Transition, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 25–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Um, Actually ( 2015;), ‘ Um, Actually: The game show where nerds correct nerds. ’, YouTube , 17 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qam4iiya1q0. Accessed 14 October 2020.
  49. Wann, D. L.. ( 1995;), ‘ Preliminary validation of the sport fan motivation scale. ’, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 19:4, pp. 377–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wann, D.,, Melnick, M.,, Russel, G., and Pease, D.. ( 2001), Sports Fans: The Psychology and Social Impact of Spectators, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wynne, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ How casual gamers are indirectly and objectively ruining gaming for gamers. ’, Common Sense Gaming, 25 October, https://csgmagazine.com/2017/10/25/how-casual-gamers-are-indirectly-and-objectively-ruining-gaming-for-gamers/. Accessed 31 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zubernis, L., and Larsen, K.. ( 2012), Fandom at the Crossroads: Celebration, Shame and Fan/Producer Relationships, Newcastle upon Tyne:: Cambridge Scholars Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Plante, Courtney N.,, Reysen, Stephen,, Chadborn, Daniel,, Roberts, Sharon E., and Gerbasi, Kathleen C.. ( 2020;), ‘ “Get out of my fandom, newbie”: A cross-fandom study of elitism and gatekeeping in fans. ’, Journal of Fandom Studies, 8:2, pp. 123–146, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
Loading
‘Get out of my fandom, newbie’: A cross-fandom study of elitism and gatekeeping in fans
Journal of Fandom Studies, The 8, 123 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00013_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): anime; brony; elitism; fandom; fanship; furry; gatekeeping

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test