Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2046-6692
  • E-ISSN: 2046-6706

Abstract

Studies of the reasons fans transform texts for the most part leave unanswered the question of why particular kinds of texts are transformed by fans more frequently than others. All texts are technically available for fan transformation. However, not all texts are equally transformed. It is an objective fact that some TV shows attract more transformative fan engagement than others. In this article, I argue that formal properties of texts make them more likely to be subject to transformative fan works, i.e. more transformable. Shows that (1) posit a plastic universe that more easily accommodates ‘play’ than realism, (2) involve stories that follow some of the narrative conventions of melodrama and (3) display main characters with ‘ship’ – especially homoerotic ‘slash’ – potential have transformable canons. To prove this thesis, I examine two of the shows – and their respective fanfiction – that have the most fanfiction on FanFiction.net and ArchiveOfOurOwn.org: and .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00071_1
2023-09-06
2024-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Åström, Berit (2010), ‘“Let’s get those Winchesters pregnant”: Male pregnancy in Supernatural fan fiction’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 4, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2010.0135.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacon-Smith, Camille (1992), Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Ron (2013), ‘Glee/House Hunters International: Gay narratives’, in E. Thompson and J. Mittell (eds), How to Watch Television, New York: New York University Press, pp. 13038.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Booth, Paul (2015), Playing Fans: Negotiating Fandom and Media in the Digital Age, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruce, Melissa N. (2010), ‘The Impala as negotiator of melodrama and masculinity in Supernatural’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 4, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2010.0154.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Busse, Kristina and Helleckson, Karen (2006), ‘Introduction: Work in progress’, in K. Helleckson and K. Busse (eds), Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., pp. 532.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coppa, Francesca (2017), The Fanfiction Reader: Folk Tales for the Digital Age, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Derecho, Abigail (2006), ‘Archontic literature: A definition, a history, and several theories of fanfiction’, in K. Hellekson and K. Busse (eds), Fanfiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., pp. 6178.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fanlore (2022), ‘Fluff’, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fluff. Accessed 28 January 2022.
  10. Feuer, Jane (1984), ‘Melodrama, serial form and television today’, Screen, 25:1, pp. 417.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, Shoshanna, Jenkins, Cynthia and Jenkins, Henry (2006), ‘“Normal female interest in men bonking”: Selections from the Terra Nostra Underground and Strange Bedfellows’, in H. Jenkins (ed.), Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture, New York: New York University Press, pp. 6188.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grossberg, Lawrence (1992), ‘Is there a fan in the house? The affective sensibility of fandom’, in L. A. Lewis (ed.), The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media, New York: Routledge, pp. 5065.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrisson, Juliette Grace (2016), ‘Shipping in Plato’s symposium’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 21, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2016.0690.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hellekson, Karen and Busse, Kristina (2014), ‘Fan fiction as literature’, in K. Hellekson and K. Busse (eds), The Fan Fiction Studies Reader, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, pp. 11629.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunting, Kyra (2021), ‘Critical content analysis: A methodological proposal for the incorporation of numerical data into critical/cultural media studies’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 45:1, pp. 3958.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jamison, Anne (2013), Fic: Why Fanfiction Is Taking Over the World, Dallas, TX: Smart POP.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenkins, Henry (1992), Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenkins, Henry (2006), Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, Sara Gwenllian (2014), ‘The sex lives of cult television characters’, in K. Hellekson and K. Busse (eds), The Fan Fiction Studies Reader, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, pp. 1925.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kies, Bridget (2014), ‘The monstrous male body’, in L. Zubernis and K. Larsen (eds), Fan Phenomena: Supernatural, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 2233.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kohnen, Melanie E. S. (2018), ‘Fannish affect, “quality” fandom, and transmedia storytelling campaigns’, in M. A. Click and S. Scott (eds), The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom, New York: Routledge, pp. 33746.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kustritz, Anne (2003), ‘Slashing the romance narrative’, Journal of American Culture, 26:1, pp. 37184.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewis, Jon (2008), American Film: A History, New York: W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Linn, Rachel (2017), ‘Bodies in horrifying hurt/comfort fan fiction: Paying the toll’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 25, https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/1102/907. Accessed 3 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Łuksza, Agata (2016), ‘Boy melodrama: Genre negotiations and gender-bending in the Supernatural series’, Text Matters, 6:6, pp. 17794.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Marshall, Tom (2017), ‘Is Sherlock really a fantasy rather than a crime drama?’, CultBox, 14 January, https://cultbox.co.uk/features/opinion/is-sherlock-really-a-fantasy-rather-than-a-crime-drama. Accessed 2 April 2023.
  27. McClellan, Ann K. (2018), Sherlock’s World: Fan Fiction and the Reimagining of BBC’s Sherlock, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mercer, John (2007), ‘Melodrama’, in B. K. Grant (ed.), Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film, Detroit: Schirmer Reference, pp. 13139.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. obsession_inc (2009), ‘Affirmational fandom vs. transformational fandom’, Dreamwidth, 1 June, https://archive.ph/2013.06.20-214318/https://obsession-inc.dreamwidth.org/82589.html. Accessed 15 April 2021.
  30. Oziewicz, Marek (2017), ‘Speculative fiction’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature, 29 March, https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-78. Accessed 31 July 2022.
  31. Parrot, Rebekah (n.d.), ‘What is demand?’, Parrot Analytics, https://helpcenter.parrotanalytics.com/en/articles/3787220-what-is-demand. Accessed 1 April 2021.
  32. Parsemain, Ava L. (2019), The Pedagogy of Queer TV, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Radway, Janice A. (1984), Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rambukkana, Nathan (2007), ‘Is slash an alternative medium? “Queer” heterotopias and the role of autonomous media spaces in radical world building’, Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, 1:1, pp. 6985, https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6164. Accessed 2 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Romano, Aja (2020), ‘The Untamed, streaming on Netflix, ripped my heart out and fed it to me: I can’t get enough’, Vox, 27 March, https://www.vox.com/2020/3/27/21192718/the-untamed-netflix-review-rec-mdzs-cql. Accessed 2 April 2023.
  36. Sandvoss, Cornel (2017), ‘The death of the reader? Literary theory and the study of texts in popular culture’, in J. Gray, C. Sandvoss and C. L. Harrington (eds), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World, 2nd ed., New York: New York University Press, pp. 2944.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Stein, Louisa and Busse, Kristina (2009), ‘Limit play: Fan authorship between source text, intertext, and context’, Popular Communication, 7:4, pp. 192207.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stratton, Jon (1987), ‘Watching the detectives: Television melodrama and its genres’, Australasian Drama Studies, 10, pp. 4966.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ‘Supernatural 2a’ (1999), Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th ed., Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Incorporated.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Supernatural Wiki (n.d.), ‘Monster’, https://supernatural.fandom.com/wiki/Monster. Accessed 2 April 2023.
  41. Tosenberger, Catherine (2008), ‘“The epic love story of Sam and Dean”: Supernatural, queer readings, and the romance of incestuous fanfiction’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 1, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2008.030.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. TV Series Finale (2018), ‘Grey’s Anatomy: Season 14 ratings’, 18 May, https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/greys-anatomy-season-14-ratings/. Accessed 28 January 2022.
  43. TV Series Finale (2019), ‘Supernatural: Season 14 ratings’, 26 April, https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/supernatural-season-14-ratings/. Accessed 28 January 2023.
  44. Zubernis, Lynn and Larsen, Katherine (2012), Fandom at the Crossroads: Celebration, Shame and Fan/Producer Relationships, London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00071_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00071_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error