Delicious angst and tooth-rotting fluff: Distant reading community discourses of emotion in Harry Potter fanfiction comments

References

1. Ahmed, Sara (2014), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boot, Peter (2023), ‘“A pretty sublime mix of WTF and OMG”: Four explorations into the practice of evaluation on online book reviewing platforms’, Journal of Cultural Analytics, 7:2, https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.68086.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bordo, Susan (1993), Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burger, Alissa (2019), ‘Feasts, family, and fun: Food in J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 52:2, pp. 15–28, https://doi.org/10.1353/mml.2019.0015.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Contois, Emily J. H. (2020), Diners, Dudes and Diets: How Gender and Power Collide in Food Media and Culture, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coppa, Francesca (ed.) (2017), The Fanfiction Reader: Folk Tales for the Digital Age, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Corinth, Jacqueline (2008), ‘Food symbolism in three children’s literature texts: Grahame’s The Wind in the Willows, Dahl’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Rowling’s Harry Potter novels’, in A. M. Magid (ed.), You Are What You Eat: Literary Probes into the Palate, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 260–80.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Duggan, Jennifer (2022), ‘Transformative readings: Harry Potter fan fiction, trans/queer reader response, and J. K. Rowling’, Children’s Literature in Education, 53:2, pp. 147–68, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10583-021-09446-9. Accessed 20 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fiesler, Casey and Dym, Brianna (2020), ‘Moving across lands: Online platform migration in fandom communities’, Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction, 4:CSCW1, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1145/3392847.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fluff (2022), ‘Fluff’, Fanlore.org, 29 July, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fluff. Accessed 8 February 2023.
11. Get ‘em (2023), ‘Get ‘em’, Fanlore.org, 19 January, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Get_%27em. Accessed 21 April 2023.
12. Grossberg, Lawrence (1992), ‘Is there a fan in the house? The affective sensibility of fandom’, in L. A. Lewis (ed.), The Adoring Audience, London: Routledge, pp. 50–56, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181539.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hellekson, Karen (2009), ‘A fannish field of value: Online fan gift culture’, Cinema Journal, 48:4, pp. 113–18, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25619733. Accessed 7 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hellekson, Karen and Busse, Kristina (eds) (2006), Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kee, Chera (2017), ‘Poe Dameron hurts so prettily: How fandom negotiates with transmedia characterization’, NANO: New American Notes Online, 12, https://ru.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/poe-dameron-hurts-so-prettily-how-fandom/docview/2322158752/se-2. Accessed 21 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kelley, Brit (2021), Loving Fanfiction: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Online Fandoms, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel and Suchomel, Vít (2014), ‘The Sketch Engine: Ten years on’, Lexicography, 1:1, pp. 7–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Linn, Rachel Elizabeth (2017), ‘Bodies in horrifying hurt/comfort fan fiction: Paying the toll’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 25, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2017.01102.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mithen (2013), ‘Meta: In defense of feels’, Dreamwidth, 17 May, https://www.dreamwidth.org/captcha?returnto=https://mithen.dreamwidth.org/42784.html. Accessed 9 February 2023.
20. Moore, Christopher Luke (2020), ‘An approach to online fan persona’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 33, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2020.1703.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Moretti, Franco (2000), ‘Conjectures on world literature’, New Left Review, 1:54, https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii1/articles/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature. Accessed 22 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Naber, Floor and Boot, Peter (2019), ‘Exploring the features of naturalist prose using LIWC in Nederlab’, Journal of Dutch Literature, 10:1, pp. 50–70, https://www.journalofdutchliterature.org/index.php/jdl/article/view/183. Accessed 31 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pande, Rukmini (2018), Squee from the Margins: Fandom and Race, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pearce, Michael (2008), ‘Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using Sketch Engine’, Corpora, 3:1, pp. 1–29, https://doi.org/10.3366/E174950320800004X.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pennebaker, James W., Boyd, Ryan L., Jordan, Kayla and Blackburn, Kate (2015a), The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015, Austin, TX: University of Texas Libraries, https://doi.org/10.15781/T29G6Z.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pennebaker, James W., Booth, Roger J., Boyd, Ryan L. and Francis, Martha E. (2015b), Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015 Operator’s Manual, Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Proctor, William (2013), ‘“Holy crap, more Star Wars! More Star Wars? What if they’re crap?”: Disney, Lucasfilm and Star Wars online fandom in the 21st century’, Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10:1, pp. 198–224, https://www.participations.org/10-01-12-proctor.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pugh, Sheenagh (2005), The Democratic Genre: Fan Fiction in a Literary Context, Bridgend: Seren Books.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rebora, Simone, Boot, Peter, Pianzola, Federico, Gasser, Brigitte, Herrmann, J. Berenike, Kraxenberger, Maria, Kuijpers, Moniek M., Lauer, Gerhard, Lendvai, Piroska, Messerli, Thomas C. and Sorrentino, Pasqualina (2019), ‘Digital humanities and digital social reading’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36:Supplement 2, pp. ii230–50, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab020.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Reinhard, CarrieLynn D., Largent, Julia E. and Chin, Bertha (2021), ‘Introduction: Food culture and fandom’, in C. D. Reinhard, J. E. Largent and B. Chin (eds), Eating Fandom: Intersections between Fans and Food Cultures, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Rodrigues, Francisco (2021), ‘AO3 API 2.07’, Github, https://github.com/ArmindoFlores/ao3_api. Accessed 31 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rouse, Lauren (2021), ‘Fan fiction comments and their relationship to classroom learning’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 35, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2021.1911.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Samutina, Natalia (2017), ‘Emotional landscapes of reading: Fan fiction in the context of contemporary reading practices’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20:3, pp. 253–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916628238.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Temming, Maria (2023), ‘The pain fandom: How whump – one of fandom’s oldest and most divisive genres – gained a fanbase of its own’, Fansplaining.com, 20 March, https://www.fansplaining.com/articles/the-pain-fandom. Accessed 21 April 2023.
35. Underwood, Ted (2017), ‘A genealogy of distant reading’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11:2, n.pag., http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000317/000317.html. Accessed 22 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wilson, Anna (2016), ‘The role of affect in fan fiction’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 21, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2016.0684.
    [Google Scholar]