Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2046-6692
  • E-ISSN: 2046-6706

Abstract

This article situates ongoing debates about the governance policies of Archive of Our Own (AO3) in the context of the ideological tradition of technoliberalism, which links internet technologies with liberal ideals such as freedom of speech and individual choice. While often seen as a movement of the mid-2000s which swiftly gave way to straightforward corporatism, technoliberalism survives as a popular discourse in the AO3 debates, where popular rhetoric incorporates liberal defences of free speech and individual choice. Modern technoliberal arguments have developed in response to their critics, emphasizing individualistic content controls as an opportunity for self-expression and as protection from a historical tradition of censorship in fandom spaces.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00088_1
2024-06-06
2026-04-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (2021a), ‘Comment: An update on blocking and muting features’, AO3 news, April 2021, https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/18864. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  2. Anon. (2021b), ‘Comment: An update on blocking and muting features’, AO3 news, April 2021, https://archiveofourown.org/comments/411088830. Accessed 18 January 2023.
  3. Aburime, Samantha (2021), ‘The cult structure of the American anti’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 36, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2021.2147.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. apocalypticromantic666 (2022), 24 November, https://www.tumblr.com/space-dorito/701833079817388032/minors-ao3-is-disgusting-adults-okay-then. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  5. astolat (2007), ‘Is this for Atanasoski? I’m having trouble with all the blocks’, March, https://astolat.livejournal.com/150556.html. Accessed 19 January 2023.
  6. Atanasoski, Neda and Vora, Kalindi (2019), Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Attu, Rose and Terras, Melissa (2017), ‘What people study when they study tumblr: Classifying tumblr-related academic research’, Journal of Documentation, 73:3, pp. 52854.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barlow, John Perry (1996), ‘A declaration of the independence of cyberspace’, Electronic frontier foundation, 9 February, https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence. Accessed 26 March 2024.
  9. Baron, Larry (1990), ‘Pornography and gender equality: An empirical analysis’, Journal of Sex Research, 27:3, pp. 36380.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve ([1999] 2005), The New Spirit of Capitalism (trans. Elliott), New York and London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. centreoftheselights (2013), ‘Ao3 census masterpost’, 5 November, https://archiveofourown.org/works/17019228. Accessed 16 June 2023.
  12. Christensen, Bo Allesøe and Jensen, Thessa (2018), ‘The JohnLock Conspiracy, fandom eschatology, and longing to belong’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 27, p. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong (2021), Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Coleman, E Gabriella and Golub, Alex (2008), ‘Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism’, Anthropological Theory, 8:3, pp. 25577.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. eelia_faustus (2022), ‘An update on blocking and muting features’, 3 April, https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/18864. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  16. end-otw-racism (2023c), ‘End OTW racism: A call to action’, tumblr, 10 May, https://www.tumblr.com/end-otw-racism/716978822501875712/fandom-against-racism-a-manifesto. Accessed 16 June 2023.
  17. Fanlore (2023a), ‘Fanfiction.net’s nc-17 purges: 2002 and 2012’, https://fanlore.org/wiki/FanFiction.Net%27s_NC-17_Purges:_2002_and_2012. Accessed 19 January 2023.
  18. Fanlore (2023b), ‘Strikethrough and boldthrough’, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Strikethrough_and_Boldthrough. Accessed 19 January 2023.
  19. Fiesler, Casey, Morrison, Shannon and Bruckman, Amy S. (2016), ‘An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design’, in J. Kaye, P. A. Druin, C. Lampe, D. Morris, J. P. Hourcade (eds), Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA and New Yok: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 257485.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fink, Marty and Miller, Quinn (2014), ‘Trans media moments: Tumblr, 2011–2013’, Television & New Media, 15:7, pp. 61126.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fish, Adam (2017), Technoliberalism and the End of Participatory Culture in the United States, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Floegel, Diana (2022), ‘Porn bans, purges, and rebirths: The biopolitics of platform death in queer fandoms’, Internet Histories, 6:1-&2, pp. 90112.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. flourish (2018), 26 May, https://flourish.tumblr.com/post/180760736735/why-are-we-surprised. Accessed 19 January 2023.
  24. Haimson, Oliver L, Delmonaco, Daniel, Nie, Peipei and Wegner, Andrea (2021), ‘Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas’, in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5:CSCW2, pp. 135.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lothian, Alexis and Stanfill, Mel (2021), ‘An archive of whose own? White feminism and racial justice in fan fiction’s digital infrastructure’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 36, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2021.2119.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Malaby, Thomas (2011), Making Virtual Worlds: Linden Lab and Second Life, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marwick, Alice E and boyd, danah (2011), ‘I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience’, New Media & Society, 13:1, pp. 11433.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marwick, Alice E. and Caplan, Robyn (2018), ‘Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment’, Feminist Media Studies, 18:4, pp. 54359.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Morozov, Evgeny (2013), To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism, New York: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakamura, Lisa (2015), ‘The unwanted labour of social media: Women of colour call out culture as venture community management’, New Formations, 86:86, pp. 10612.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Noble, Safiya Umoja (2018), Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Organization for Transformative Works (n.d.a), ‘Archive of our own (beta)’, 14 November, https://archiveofourown.org/. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  33. Organization for Transformative Works (n.d.b), ‘Terms of service (archive of our own)’, 14 November, https://archiveofourown.org/tosIV.G. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  34. Pfister, Damien Smith and Yang, Misti (2018), ‘Five theses on technoliberalism and the networked public sphere’, Communication and the Public, 3:3, pp. 24762.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Phillips, Whitney and Milner, Ryan M. (2021), You Are Here: A Field Guide for Navigating Polarized Speech, Conspiracy Theories, and Our Polluted Media Landscape, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. pocketseizure (2016), 16 October, https://pocketseizure.tumblr.com/post/151882875079. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  37. rage-against-the-dying-of light (2022), 23 November, https://fordtato.tumblr.com/post/701244352210550784. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  38. Roberts, Sarah T. (2016), ‘Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’, in S. U. Noble and B. Tynes (eds), The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online, vol. 16, Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 14760, https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12. Accessed 16 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ross, Emily (2020), ‘Researching experiences of cancer risk through online blogs: A reflexive account of working toward ethical practice’, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 15:1–2, pp. 4654.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sap, Maarten, Card, Dallas, Gabriel, Saadia, Choi, Yejin and Smith, Noah A. (2019), ‘The risk of racial bias in hate speech detection’, in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 26 March, Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, pp. 166878, https://aclanthology.org/P19-1163. Accessed 21 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. sassysnowperson (2022), 8 November, https://www.tumblr.com/sassysnowperson/700389600432160768/so-i-made-one. Accessed 19 January 2023.
  42. Schneier, Bruce (2015), Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World, New York and London: WW Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. shipping-isnt morality (2018), 12 May, https://shipping-isnt-morality.tumblr.com/post/173835925343/good-morning-im-salty-i-think-we-as-a. Accessed 18 January 2023.
  44. Stein, Louisa Ellen (2017), ‘Tumblr fan aesthetics’, in M. A. Click and S. Scott (eds), The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom, 8 November, New York: Routledge, pp. 8697.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. stopthatimp (2016), 22 October, https://stopthatimp.tumblr.com/post/152176612333/ao3-censorship. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  46. Syed, Nabiha (2017), ‘Real talk about fake news: Towards a better theory for platform governance’, Yale Law Journal Forum, 127, p. 337.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. TheWillowBends (2021), ‘ An update on blocking and muting features’, Archive of Our Own, 2 April 2021, https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/18864. Accessed 9 January 2023.
/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00088_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test