‘OG D&D’: Analysing aspects of fandom cultural capital in contentious Dungeons & Dragons social media

References

1. Ahmed, Wasim, Bath, Peter and Demartini, Gianluca (2017), ‘Using Twitter as a data source: An overview of ethical, legal, and methodological challenges’, in R. Eynon, J. Fry and R. Schroeder (eds), The Ethics of Online Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 79–107.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Ian, Turner, Ian and Kotera, Yasuhiro (2023), ‘Role-play games (RPGs) for mental health (why not?): Roll for initiative’, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21:6, pp. 3901–09, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00832-y.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris (2000), ‘Critical discourse analysis’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29:1, pp. 447–66, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bourdieu, Pierre (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–58.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bowman, Sarah Lynne (2013), ‘Social conflict in role-playing communities: An exploratory qualitative study’, International Journal of Role-Playing, 4:4, pp. 4–25, https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi4.183.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bowman, Sarah Lynne (2024), ‘Immersion and shared imagination in role-playing games’, in S. Deterding and J. Zagal (eds), Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations, London: Routledge, pp. 379–94.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Consalvo, Mia (2009), ‘There is no magic circle’, Games and Culture, 4:4, pp. 408–17, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009343575.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dashiell, Steven (2018), ‘Rules as written: Game algorithms as game capital’, Analog Game Studies, 5:3, https://analoggamestudies.org/2018/09/rules-as-written-analyzing-changes-in-reliance-on-game-system-algorithms-as-shifts-in-game-capital/. Accessed 21 January 2026.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dashiell, Steven (2020), ‘Hooligans at the table: The concept of male preserves in tabletop role-playing games’, International Journal of Role-Playing, 10, pp. 26–39, https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi10.274.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dashiell, Steven (2022a), ‘DM Habitus: The social dispositions of game mastering in Dungeons & Dragons’, Japanese Journal of Analog RPG 学研究, 3, pp. 3–13, https://jarps.net/index.php/journal/article/view/37. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dashiell, Steven (2022b), ‘Chasing the Dragon (magazine): Gender erasure through discourse in Dragon magazine, 1978–2005’, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 22:6, pp. 620–30, https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086221097635.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dashiell, Steven (2023), ‘Discussions of fantasy characters and demonstrations of a defensive hybridity in gamer masculinity’, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 31:1, pp. 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265221084017.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Davis, Jenny and Love, Tony (2019), ‘Generalizing from social media data: A formal theory approach’, Information, Communication & Society, 22:5, pp. 637–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555610.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Diamond, Amelia (2022), ‘Who’s playing Dungeons & Dragons these days? The usual fans and then some’, the New York Times, 22 May, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/21/style/dungeons-and-dragons.html. Accessed 5 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dixit, Priya (2022), ‘Memeing the far-right: Pepe and the deplorables’, in P. Dixit (ed.), Race, Popular Culture, and Far-Right Extremism in the United States, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 135–72.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fairclough, Norman (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fiesler, Casey and Proferes, Nicholas (2018), ‘Participant perceptions of Twitter research ethics’, Social Media+ Society, 4:1, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fuist, Todd (2012), ‘The agentic imagination: Tabletop role-playing games as a cultural tool’, in E. Torner and W. White (eds), Immersive Gameplay: Essays on Participatory Media and Role-Playing, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, pp. 108–26.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Garcia, Antero (2017), ‘Privilege, power, and Dungeons & Dragons: How systems shape racial and gender identities in tabletop role-playing games’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24:3, pp. 232–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1293691.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gardiner, Sarah, Vada, Sera, Yang, Elaine Chao, Khoo, Catheryn and Le, Truc (2022), ‘Recreating history: The evolving negotiation of staged authenticity in tourism experiences’, Tourism Management, 91, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104515.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gillespie, Greg and Crouse, Darren (2012), ‘There and back again: Nostalgia, art, and ideology in old-school dungeons and dragons’, Games and Culture, 7:6, pp. 441–70, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412012465004.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gygax, Gary and Arneson, Dave (1974), The Underworld & Wilderness Adventures. Dungeons & Dragons: Rules for Fantastic Medieval Wargames Campaigns Playable with Paper and Pencil and Miniature Figures, Geneva: TSR.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hart, Gavin and Huber, Antionette (2023), ‘Five things we need to learn about incel extremism: Issues, challenges and avenues for fresh research’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2195067.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hills, Matt (2018), ‘An extended foreword: From fan doxa to toxic fan practices’, Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 15:1, pp. 105–26.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hines, Mark (2023), ‘Game mechanics and narrative as symbiotic, co-constructive elements in Tomb of Annihilation’, Analog Game Studies, 10:1, https://analoggamestudies.org/2023/03/thats-just-what-the-book-says-game-mechanics-and-narrative-as-symbiotic-co-constructive-elements-in-tomb-of-annihilation/. Accessed 9 February 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Huizinga, Johan (1949), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Johnson, Lars (2020), ‘Gender, race, and participatory neomedievalism in Dungeons & Dragons’, eSharp, 26, pp. 68–79, https://www.gla.ac.uk/research/az/esharp/esharp/28summer2020/. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiesling, Scott (2007), ‘Men, masculinities, and language’, Language and Linguistics Compass, 1:6, pp. 653–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00035.x.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Laycock, Joseph (2015), Dangerous Games: What the Moral Panic over Role-Playing Games Says about Play, Religion, and Imagined Worlds, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Long, Timar (2016), ‘Character creation diversity in gaming art’, International Journal of Role-Playing, 7:7, pp. 23–29, https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi7.254.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Maliszewski, James (2009), ‘Full circle: A history of the old school revival’, The Escapist, 20 August, https://www.escapistmagazine.com/full-circle-a-history-of-the-old-school-revival/. Accessed 2 January 2025.
32. Mason, Shannon and Singh, Lenandlar (2022), ‘Reporting and discoverability of “Tweets” quoted in published scholarship: Current practice and ethical implications’, Research Ethics, 18:2, pp. 93–113, https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221076948.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Massanari, Adrienne (2018), ‘Rethinking research ethics, power, and the risk of visibility in the era of the ‘alt-right’ gaze’, Social Media & Society, 4:2, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768302.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mizer, Nicholas (2014), ‘The paladin ethic and the spirit of dungeoneering’, Journal of Popular Culture, 47:6, pp. 1296–313, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12213.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mizer, Nicholas (2019), Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Experience of Imagined Worlds, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mogashoa, Tebogo (2014), ‘Understanding critical discourse analysis in qualitative research’, International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1:7, pp. 104–13, https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v1-i7/12.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Neale, Steve (2013), ‘Masculinity as spectacle’, in M. Merck (ed.), The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality, London: Routledge, pp. 277–87.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Partala, Timo (2022), ‘Digital gaming during the early COVID-19 pandemic: Healthy escapism and social connectedness’, Proceedings of DiGRA 2022 Conference: Bringing Worlds Together, Krakow, Poland, 7–11 July, n.p.: Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA), https://doi.org/10.26503/dl.v2022i1.1416.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Proctor, William (2017), ‘Bitches ain’t gonna hunt no ghosts: Totemic nostalgia, toxic fandom and the Ghostbusters platonic’, Palabra Clave, 20:4, pp. 1105–41, https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.4.10.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Proctor, William and Kies, Bridget (2018), ‘On toxic fan practices and the new culture wars’, Participations, 15:1, pp. 127–42, https://www.participations.org/15-01-08-proctor.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Proctor, William, Kies, Bridget, Chin, Bertha, Larsen, Katherine, McCulloch, Richard, Pande, Rukmini and Stanfill, Mel (2018), ‘On toxic fan practices: A round-table’, Participations, 15:1, pp. 370–93, https://www.participations.org/15-01-21-proctor.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Remmele, Bernd and Whitton, Nicola (2014), ‘Disrupting the magic circle: The impact of negative social gaming behaviours’, in T. Connolly (ed.), Psychology, Pedagogy, and Assessment in Serious Games, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 111–26.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Riggs, Ben (2022), Slaying the Dragon: A Secret History of Dungeons & Dragons, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Salter, Anastasia and Blodgett, Bridget (2017), Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schatzki, Theodore (2012), ‘A primer on practices’, in J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings and F. Trede (eds), Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Srivastava, Ekta, Sivakumaran, Bharadhwa, Maheswarappa, Satish and Paul, Justin (2023), ‘Nostalgia: A review, propositions, and future research agenda’, Journal of Advertising, 52:4, pp. 613–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2101036.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stang, Sarah and Trammell, Aaron (2020), ‘The ludic bestiary: Misogynistic tropes of female monstrosity in Dungeons & Dragons’, Games and Culture, 15:6, pp. 730–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019850059.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stenros, Jakko (2014), ‘In defence of a magic circle: The social, mental and cultural boundaries of play’, Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1:2, pp. 147–85, https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.10.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Švelch, Jaroslav (2020), ‘Paratextuality in game studies: A theoretical review and citation analysis’, Game Studies, 20:2, https://gamestudies.org/2002/articles/jan_svelch. Accessed 21 January 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tekinbas-Salen, Katie and Zimmerman, Eric (2003), Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. The Basic Expert (2024), ‘The OSR is kind of cringe’, The Basic Expert’s Substack, 27 July, https://thebasicexpert.substack.com/p/the-osr-is-cringe. Accessed 2 January 2025.
52. Trammell, Aaron (2016), ‘How Dungeons & Dragons appropriated the orient’, Analog Game Studies, 3:1, pp. 129–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90581-5_8.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Trammell, Aaron (2018), ‘Militarism and masculinity in Dungeons & Dragons’, in N. Taylor and G. Vorhees (eds), Masculinities in Play, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 129–47.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Trammell, Aaron (2023), The Privilege of Play: A History of Hobby Games, Race, and Geek Culture, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Vossen, Emma (2018), ‘The magic circle and consent in gaming practices’, in K. Gray, G. Voorhees and E. Vossen (eds), Feminism in Play, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 205–20.
    [Google Scholar]
56. White, William, Arjoranta, Jonne, Hitchens, Michael, Peterson, Jon, Torner, Evan and Walton, Jonathan (2024), ‘Tabletop role-playing games’, in S. Deterding and J. Zagal (eds), Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 63–86.
    [Google Scholar]