Popular pleasures: Sharpening the tools for a popular aesthetic in video game criticism

References

1. Allison, Anne (2004), ‘Cuteness as Japan’s millennial product’, in J. J. Tobin (ed.), Pikachu’s Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokémon, Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 34–49.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anable, Aubrey (2018), Playing with Feelings: Video Games and Affect, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arkenberg, Megan (2017), ‘Cuteness and control in Portal’, in J. P. Dale, J. Goggin, J. Leyda, A. McIntyre and D. Negra (eds), The Aesthetics and Affects of Cuteness, New York: Routledge, pp. 56–74.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakels, Jan-Hendrik (2020), ‘Steps toward a phenomenology of video games: Some thoughts on analyzing aesthetics and experience’, Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 11:1, pp. 71–97.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balázs, Béla (2010), ‘Visible man or the culture of film’, in E. Carter (ed.), Béla Balázs: Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film, Film Europa, vol. 10, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–90.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baumgarten, Alexander G. (2007), Aesthetica/Ästhetik, Philosophische Bibliothek (ed. D. Mirbach), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bogost, Ian (2007), Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bogost, Ian (2011), How to Do Things with Videogames, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Calleja, Gordon (2011), In-Game: From Immersion to Incorporation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Certeau, Michel de (1988), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Deen, Phillip D. (2011), ‘Interactivity, inhabitation and pragmatist aesthetics’, Game Studies, 11:2, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dewey, John (1934), Art as Experience, New York: H. Holt and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Diderot, Denis (2000), ‘Art’, in I. Frank (ed.), The Theory of Decorative Art: An Anthology of European & American Writings, 1750–1940, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 139–49.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Extremely OK Games (2018), Celeste, Vancouver: Extremely OK Games.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Falkenstein, Lorne (1990), ‘Kant’s account of sensation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20:1, pp. 63–88.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Felski, Rita (2015), The Limits of Critique, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Flanagan, Mary (2009), Critical Play: Radical Game Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Figal, Günter (2015), Aesthetics as Phenomenology: The Appearance of Things, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fiske, John (1989), Understanding Popular Culture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Forsey, Jane (2013), The Aesthetics of Design, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Galloway, Alexander R. (2006), ‘Allegories of control’, in A. R. Galloway (ed.), Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 85–106.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Good-Feel (2015), Yoshi’s Woolly World, Kyoto: Nintendo.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Good-Feel (2019), Yoshi’s Crafted World, Kyoto: Nintendo.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hanslick, Eduard (1986), On the Musically Beautiful: A Contribution towards the Revision of the Aesthetics of Music, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. (2002), ‘Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments’, in G. S. Noerr (ed.), Cultural Memory in the Present, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Isbister, Katherine (2016), How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jagoda, Patrick (2020), Experimental Games: Critique, Play, and Design in the Age of Gamification, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jenkins, Henry (2007), The Wow Climax: Tracing the Emotional Impact of Popular Culture, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Juul, Jesper (2003), ‘The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness’, in M. Copier and J. Raeseens (eds), Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, Utrecht: Utrecht University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kant, Immanuel (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Karhulahti, Veli-Matti (2013), ‘A kinesthetic theory of videogames: Time-critical challenge and aporetic rhematic’, Game Studies, 13:1, http://gamestudies.org/1301/articles/karhulahti_kinesthetic_theory_of_the_videogame. Accessed 22 December 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Keogh, Brendan (2018), A Play of Bodies: How We Perceive Videogames, Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kirkpatrick, Graeme (2011), Aesthetic Theory and the Video Game, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Klevjer, Rune (2012), ‘Enter the avatar: The phenomenology of prosthetic telepresence in computer games’, in J. R. Sageng, F. Hallvard and T. M. Larsen (eds), The Philosophy of Computer Games, Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 17–38.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lorenz, Konrad (1971), Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mersch, Dieter (2015), Epistemologies of Aesthetics, Zürich: diaphanes.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Moritz, Karl Philipp (2018a), ‘Über die bildende Nachahmung des Schönen’, in K. P. Moritz and C. Wingertszahn (eds), Schriften zur Ästhetik, Ditzingen: Reclam, pp. 16–57.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moritz, Karl Philipp (2018b), ‘Versuch einer Vereinigung aller schönen Künste und Wissenschaften unter dem Begriff des in sich selbst Vollendeten: An Herrn Moses Mendelssohn’, in K. P. Moritz and C. Wingertszahn (eds), Schriften zur Ästhetik, Ditzingen: Reclam, pp. 7–15.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nansen, Bjorn, Nicoll, Benjamin and Apperley, Thomas H. (2019), ‘Postdigitality in children’s crossmedia play: A case study of Nintendo’s amiibo figurines’, in G. Mascheroni and D. Holloway (eds), The Internet of Toys: Practices, Affordances and the Political Economy of Children’s Smart Play, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 89–108.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ngai, Sianne (2005), ‘The cuteness of the avant-garde’, Critical Inquiry, 31:4, pp. 811–47.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nguyen, C. Thi (2020), Games: Agency as Art, Oxford Scholarship Online, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nintendo R&D4 (1985), Super Mario Bros, Kyoto: Nintendo.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pajitnov, Alexey (1989), Tetris, Kyoto: Nintendo.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Pine, B. Joseph and Gilmore, James H. (2011), The Experience Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Reay, Emma (2021), ‘Cute, cuddly and completely crushable: Plushies as avatars in video games’, Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 13:2, pp. 131–49.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Reckwitz, Andreas (2020), The Society of Singularities, Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rovio Entertainment (2009), Angry Birds, Espoo: Chilingo.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schiller, Friedrich (2009), ‘Über Bürgers Gedichte’, in W. Voßkamp (ed.), Theorie der Klassik, Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 275–84.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sharp, John and Thomas, David (2019), Fun, Taste, & Games: An Aesthetics of the Idle, Unproductive, and Otherwise Playful, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sicart, Miguel (2014), Play Matters, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smith, David Woodruff (2018), ‘Phenomenology’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2018 ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/. Accessed 22 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Superbrothers/Capybara Games (2011), Superbrothers: Sword & Sworcery, Toronto: Capybara Games.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Swalwell, Melanie (2008), ‘Movement and kinaesthetic responsiveness: A neglected pleasure’, in M. Swalwell and J. Wilson (eds), The Pleasures of Computer Gaming: Essays on Cultural History, Theory and Aesthetics, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, pp. 72–93.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Swink, Steve (2008), Game Feel: A Game Designer’s Guide to Virtual Sensation, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tatarkiewicz, Władysław (1980), History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Velan Studios (2020), Mario Kart Live: Home Circuit, Kyoto: Nintendo.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Waszkiewicz, Agata and Bakun, Martyna (2020), ‘Towards the aesthetics of cozy video games’, Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 12:3, pp. 225–40.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Webster, Andrew (2019), ‘Yoshi’s Crafted World review: Impossibly charming’, The Verge, 27 March, https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/27/18282843/yoshis-crafted-world-nintendo-switch-review-super-mario. Accessed 3 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wiemer, Serjoscha (2010), ‘Playing on the plane of immanence: Notes on the resonance between body and image in music video games’, in S. Günzel, M. Liebe and D. Mersch (eds), Logic and Structure of the Computer Game, Potsdam: Potsdam University Press, pp. 165–89.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wiesing, Lambert (2016), The Visibility of the Image: History and Perspectives of Formal Aesthetics, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zangwill, Nick (1995), ‘The beautiful, the dainty, and the dumpy’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 35:4, pp. 317–29.
    [Google Scholar]