Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds
  4. Volume 16, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-191X
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1928

Abstract

() allowed players to build and/or disarm nuclear devices as a part of its live service base-building gameplay with the intention of mimicking the real-world difficulties of nuclear disarmament. Building and disarming nuclear devices in the game was further encouraged by developers through the design of two PlayStation trophies along with the promise of a secret cut-scene if players managed to eradicate all nuclear weapons on their online server. However, due to an alleged programming error it became impossible for players to actually achieve this goal. This article examines the design of the aforementioned trophies and their relationship with in-game nuclear disarmament, highlighting the larger significance of the trophy design and how the metacommentary (i.e., anti-nuclear narrative) of was undermined by metagaming practices (i.e., unlocking trophies, optimizing gameplay) and a live service business model focused on player retention and profit.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00090_1
2024-07-19
2024-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahla, Kati (2020), ‘The rise of free to play: How the revenue model changed games and playing’, Ph.D. thesis, Tampere: Tampere University.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernevega, Alexander and Gekker, Alex (2021), ‘The industry of landlords: Exploring the assetization of the triple-A game’, Games and Culture, 17:1, pp. 47–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogost, Ian (2007), Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bycer, Joshua (2022), Game Design Deep Dive: Free-To-Play, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Consalvo, Mia (2009), ‘There is no magic circle’, Games and Culture, 4:4, pp. 408–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DidYouKnowGaming (2022), ‘Is Konami hiding Metal Gear’s final chapter? Ft. @SomeOrdinaryGamers’, YouTube, 8 May, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNjpxtPdez8. Accessed 15 December 2022.
  7. Dubois, Louis-Etienne, and Weststar, Johanna (2021), ‘Games-as-a-service: Conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development’, New Media & Society, 24:10, pp. 2332–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gandolfi, Enrico and Sciannamblo, Mariacristina (2019), ‘Unfolding female quiet in wargames: Gender bias in Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain from representation to gameplay’, Feminist Media Studies, 19:3, pp. 331–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gee, James Paul (2014), Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, and Video Games, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Tanner, Higgen (2009), ‘Turn the game console off right now!’, in N. B. Huntemann and M. T. Payne (eds), Joystick Soldiers: The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 252–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hastatus_Atratus (2017), ‘Protest to fix MGSV’s broken secret nuclear disarmament event: December 8 2017’, Reddit, 9 December, https://www.reddit.com/r/metalgearsolid/comments/7g8mwp/protest_to_fix_mgsvs_broken_secret_nuclear/. Accessed 23 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hideo_Kojima (2022), ‘MGS1 was released in 1998: When I mentioned “anti-nuclear and anti-war” in an interview, the media laughed at me: I was ridiculed by my peers and by the company’, Twitter, 13 February, https://twitter.com/HIDEO_KOJIMA_EN/status/1492797335256334336. Accessed 29 January 2024.
  13. Hutchinson, Rachael (2019a), ‘Fukasaku Kinji and Kojima Hideo replay Hiroshima: Atomic imagery and cross-media memory’, Japanese Studies, 39:2, pp. 169–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchinson, Rachael (2019b), Japanese Culture through Videogames, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Konami (2015a), ‘@N_Pini @popcicle the truth can be found for peace’, Twitter, 3 November, https://twitter.com/Konami/status/66124194333091840. Accessed 23 August 2023.
  16. Konami (2015b), ‘The secret nuclear disarmament event’, 26 November, https://www.konami.com/mg/mgs5/tpp/en/news/20151126.html. Accessed 16 March 2023.
  17. Lu, Chien, Peltonen, Jaakko, Nummenmaa, Timo, Li, Xiaozhou and Zhang, Zheying (2020), ‘What makes a trophy hunter? An empirical analysis of Reddit discussions’, in J. Koivisto, M. Bujić and J Hamari (eds), in GamiFIN Conference 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International GamiFIN Conference, Levi, Finland, 1–3 April, Tampere: Ceur-WS, pp. 146–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Metal Gear Official (2015), ‘Effects of nuclear weapon ownership have been adjusted as well extending FOB blockade duration +1 day for each nuke owned’, Twitter, 21 October, https://twitter.com/Metalgear/status/656543637816217600. Accessed 23 August 2023.
  19. Middler, Jordan (2022), ‘Metal Gear Solid 5’s infamous nuclear disarmament mission is “impossible”, investigation concludes’, VGC, 9 May, https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/metal-gear-solid-5s-infamous-nuclear-disarmament-mission-is-impossible-investigation-concludes/. Accessed 16 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Murray, Soraya (2018), ‘Landscapes of empire in Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain’, Critical Inquiry, 45:1, pp. 168–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Nightingale, Ed (2022), ‘Turns out Metal Gear Solid 5’s nuclear disarmament was rigged all along’, Eurogamer, 10 May, https://www.eurogamer.net/turns-out-metal-gear-solid-5s-nuclear-disarmament-was-rigged-all-along. Accessed 16 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Parijat, Shubhankar (2017), ‘Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain’s main motive is nuclear disarmament, confirms Hideo Kojima’, Gamingbolt, 27 August, https://gamingbolt.com/metal-gear-solid-5-the-phantom-pains-main-motive-is-nuclear-disarmament-confirms-hideo-kojima. Accessed 24 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. PlayStation Trophies (2020), ‘Deterrence trophy in Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain’, PlayStationTrophies, 8 December, https://www.playstationtrophies.org/game/metal-gear-solid-5-the-phantom-pain-ps4/trophy/119556-deterrence.html. Accessed 16 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Staines, Dan, Scheiding, Ryan and Blasonato, Myles (2022), ‘Trophies, typhon and trolley problems: Moral play and playing well in prey’, Well Played, 11:1, pp. 56–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stein, Eric (2020), ‘It can’t be for nothing: Communicating intentions for play through trophy design in The Last of Us and The Last of Us Part II’, TWU Research and Creativity Symposium, 28 August, Trinity Western University, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Thier, Dave (2015), ‘Metal Gear Solid 5’s biggest secret is totally insane’, Forbes, 18 September, https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2015/09/18/metal-gear-solid-5s-biggest-secret/?sh=5854945f7514. Accessed 16 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00090_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): game design; Hideo Kojima; Japanese games; Konami; metagaming; Metal Gear; PlayStation trophies

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error