Skip to content
1981
Consensual Play
  • ISSN: 1757-191X
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1928

Abstract

This article examines how game studies and the gaming industry collaborate to manufacture consent to whiteness, fostering a that normalizes whiteness as the default subjectivity in gaming. It begins by contextualizing against the backdrop of Gamergate 2.0, highlighting how this cultural moment reinforces long-standing exclusionary practices in video game culture. The article then critiques the early celebration of the ‘magic circle’ in game studies and argues that it helped codify whiteness as foundational to the discipline. Video game design is subsequently analysed as a process that conceals its ideological apparatus, and it argues that video games are helpful interlocutors for exploring the ‘manufacture of consent’. Drawing on the concept of ‘manufacturing consent’, this article contends that the collective apparatus of game studies and the gaming industry positions whiteness as the exemplary implied gamer and reifies a racialized hierarchy within gaming culture. Using the critical literature of as a case study, the article critiques how analyses of subjectivity and agency in game studies frequently overlook the racialized and gendered dimensions embedded in a game’s design. Finally, by foregrounding race in , the article not only disrupts this collective consent to whiteness but also advocates for a reimagined game studies that centres the racial, gendered and sociopolitical categories shaping video games and their broader cultural impact.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00113_1
2025-05-29
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 3909 LLC (2013), Papers, Please, n.p.: Lucas Pope.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarseth, Espen (2004), ‘Genre trouble’, Electronic Book Review, 21 May, https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/genre-trouble/. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aarseth, Espen (2007), ‘I fought the law: Transgressive play and the implied player’, in Situated Play: Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 24–28 September, DiGRA, pp. 130–33, https://dl.digra.org/index.php/dl/article/download/282/282/279. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Asmongold TV (2024), ‘I talked to the creator of “Sweet Baby Inc. Detected”’, YouTube, 4 March, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFrwMVdLLDM. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  5. Backe, Hans-Joachim and Thon, Jan-Noël (2019), ‘Playing with identity: Authors, narrators, avatars, and players in The Stanley Parable and The Beginner’s Guide’, Diegesis, 8:2, pp. 1–25, https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/357. Accessed 30 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bassell, Rebeccah Rose (2016), ‘“This is the story of a man named Stanley”: Narratology, authorship and agency in The Stanley Parable’, honours theses, Lewiston, ME: Bates College, https://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/161. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bates, Thomas R. (1975), ‘Gramsci and the theory of hegemony’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 36:2, pp. 351–66, https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brock Jr., Andre (2011), ‘Beyond the pale: The blackbird web browser’s critical reception’, New Media and Society, 13:7, pp. 1085–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810397031.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Caillois, Roger (1961), Man, Play and Games, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Capcom (2009), Resident Evil 5, Osaka: Capcom.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ConcernedApe (2016), Stardew Valley, n.p.: ConcernedApe.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Derian, James Der (2001), ‘Global events, national security, and virtual theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30:3, pp. 669–90, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300030301.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. DiGRA Diversity Collective (2024), ‘DiGRA Diversity Collective statement’, DiGRA.org, 19 August, https://digra.org/digra-diversity-collective-statement/. Accessed 9 September 2024.
  14. Dyer, Richard (2014), ‘The matter of whiteness’, in P. Rothenberg (ed.), White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Other Side of Racism, Broadway: Worth, pp. 9–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyer-Witheford, Nick and Peuter, Greig de (2013), Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, Simon, Smith, Jonas Heide and Pajares Tosca, Susana (2009), Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Emery, David (2022), ‘Snopestionary: What was “Gamergate”?’, Snopes, 4 April, https://www.snopes.com/articles/402899/what-was-gamergate/. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  18. Ensslin, Astrid (2015), ‘Video games as unnatural narratives’, in M. Fuchs (ed.), Diversity of Play, Lüneburg: meson press, pp. 41–70, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/550.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Farca, Gerald (2019), Playing Dystopia: Nightmarish Worlds in Video Games and the Player’s Aesthetic Response, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fest, Bradley J. (2024), ‘Metaproceduralism: The Stanley Parable and the legacies of postmodern metafiction’, Wide Screen, 6:1, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.17613/M6V02N.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fickle, Tara (2019), The Race Card: From Gaming Technologies to Model Minorities, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fredner, Erik (2013), ‘The Stanley Parable creator Davey Wreden discusses his un-discussable game’, Kill Screen, 16 October, https://killscreen.com/previously/articles/inside-stanley-parable-game-no-one-can-describe. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  23. Fried, Ina (2022), ‘How the far right borrowed its online moves from gamers’, Axios, 20 October, https://www.axios.com/2022/10/20/gamergate-right-online-harassment-joan-donovan-meme-wars. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  24. Galactic Cafe (2022), The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe, n.p.: Galactic Cafe.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Giroux, Henry (1996), Fugitive Cultures: Race, Violence, and Youth, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gramsci, Antonio (2007), Selections from the Prison Notebooks (eds and trans. Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith), New York: International Publishers. Marxist, https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/problems/intellectuals.htm. Accessed 24 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gray, Kishonna L. (2020), Intersectional Tech: Black Users in Digital Gaming, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamilton, Kirk (2011), ‘The Stanley Parable turns video game storytelling on its head’, Kotaku, 9 August, https://kotaku.com/the-stanley-parable-turns-video-game-storytelling-on-it-5829254. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  29. Hammar, Emil (2019), ‘Manufacturing consent in video games – The hegemonic memory politics of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain (2015)’, Nordlit, 42:November, pp. 279–300, https://doi.org/10.7557/13.5016.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hebert, Matt (2013), ‘Choice in Video Games’, Augmenting Realities, https://sites.duke.edu/lit80s_02_f2013_augrealities/choice-in-video-games/.
  31. Herman, Edward and Chomsky, Noam (2002), Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York: Pantheon.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hosch, Shelby (2021), ‘The 2010s: The rise of Indie games’, Questlog, 9 April, https://www.questlog.org/blog/the-2010s-the-rise-of-indie-games. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  33. Huizinga, Johan (1938), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, New York: Angelico.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Igarzábal, Federico Alvarez (2019), Time and Space in Video Games, Berlin: Bild Und Bit.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jagoda, Patrick (2020), Experimental Games: Critique, Play, and Design in the Age of Gamification, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jagoda, Patrick and Malkowski, Jennifer (eds) (2022), American Game Studies, Special Issue of American Literature, vol. 94, no. 1, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jarrell, Marie A. (2022), ‘The importance of play: Identification with video game characters’ intersectional effects on bias’, Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson, SC: Clemson University, https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2745. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. KnowYourMeme (n.d.), ‘Yellow paint game design debate’, KnowYourMeme, https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/yellow-paint-game-design-debate. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kocurek, Carly A. (2015), Coin-Operated Americans: Rebooting Boyhood at the Video Game Arcade, Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kubiński, Piotr (2017), ‘Play it again, Stanley: Mise en abyme and playing with convention and narrative in The Stanley Parable’, Tekstualia, 1:3, pp. 45–59, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5929.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, Rachel (2000), ‘Notes from the (non)field: Teaching and theorizing women of color’, Meridians, 1:1, pp. 85–109, https://doi.org/10.1215/15366936-1.1.85.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lucas Pope (2018), Return of the Obra Dinn, n.p.: Lucas Pope.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Maddy Makes Games (2018), Celeste, n.p.: Maddy Makes Games.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mattas, Jeff (2011), ‘Interview: The Stanley Parable developer Davey Wreden’, Shack News, 27 September, https://www.shacknews.com/article/70363/interview-davey-wreden-on-stanley-parable-remake-and-self-taught. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  45. McAllister, Ken S. (2004), Game Work: Language, Power, and Computer Game Culture, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Melamed, Jodi (2011), Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mojang Studios (2011), Minecraft, Stockholm: Mojang Studios.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Morrissey, Kathleen (2024), ‘Consensual play: CFP’, UPenn CFP, 31 January, https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2024/01/31/consensual-play. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  49. Murray, Janet (2013), ‘The last word on ludology v narratology in game studies: Preface to keynote talk at DiGRA 2005, Vancouver, Canada, June 17, 2005’, Inventing the Medium, 28 June, https://inventingthemedium.com/2013/06/28/the-last-word-on-ludology-v-narratology-2005/. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  50. Nguyen, C. Thi (2020), Games: Agency as Art, Oxford: Oxford Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Omi, Michael and Winant, Howard (1986), Racial Formation in the United States, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Patterson, Christopher B. (2020), Open World Empire: Race, Erotics, and the Global Rise of Video Games, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Pedercini, Paolo (2024), The New York Times Simulator, Unity, https://molleindustria.itch.io/the-new-york-times-simulator. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Phillips, Amanda (2020), Gamer Trouble: Feminist Confrontations in Digital Culture, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Pope, Lucas (2012), The Republia Times, n.p.: Lucas Pope.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Puar, Jasbir (2012), ‘“I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory’, Transversal, October, https://transversal.at/transversal/0811/puar/en. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  57. Sarian, Antranig Arek (2018), ‘Paradox and pedagogy in The Stanley Parable’, Games and Culture, 15:2, pp. 179–97, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018765550.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Scanlon, Mike, Swanson, Tom, Darvasi, Paul and Jenson, Jen (2017), ‘The first door: Gender, authority and choice in The Stanley Parable’, FDG '17: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, 37, pp. 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1145/3102071.3106349.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Schubert, Stefan (2021), ‘Playing with (meta)fictionality and self-reflexivity in the video game the Stanley Parable’, in E. Fülöp (ed.), Fictionality, Factuality, and Reflexivity across Discourses and Media, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 212–28, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110722031-014.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Sicart, Miguel (2009), The Ethics of Computer Games, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sicart, Miguel (2013), Beyond Choices: The Design of Ethical Gameplay, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sinykin, Dan (2020), American Literature and the Long Downturn: Neoliberal Apocalypse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Smith, Adam ([1759] 1999), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Southlake, TX: Gateway Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith, Adam ([1776] 1975), An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 2 (ed. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Spillers, Hortense J. (1987), ‘Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: An American grammar book’, Diacritics, 17:2, pp. 64–81, https://doi.org/10.2307/464747.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Square Enix (2024), Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, Tokyo: Square Enix.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stockwell, Stephen Edward and Muir, Adam (2003), ‘The military-entertainment complex: A new facet of information warfare’, The Fibreculture Journal, 1, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Sweet Baby Inc. (2024), ‘Homepage’, https://www.sweetbabyinc.com. Accessed 29 April 2024.
  69. Team Cherry (2017), Hollow Knight, Adelaide: Team Cherry.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Telltale Games (2012), The Walking Dead, San Rafael, CA: Telltale Games.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Toby Fox (2015), Undertale, n.p.: Toby Fox.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Trammell, Aaron (2023a), Repairing Play: A Black Phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Trammell, Aaron (2023b), The Privilege of Play: A History of Hobby Games, Race, and Geek Culture, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Waldman, Ari (2017), ‘Donald Trump and Steve Bannon need angry young men. They’re using Gamergate culture to get them’, Quartz, 3 February, https://qz.com/901761/donald-trump-and-steve-bannon-are-using-gamergate-culture-to-attract-angry-white-men. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  75. Wark, McKenzie (2007), Gamer Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Waszkiewicz, Agata (2024), Metagames: Games about Games, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Wildt, Lars de (2014), ‘Precarious play: To be or not to be Stanley’, Press Start, 1:1, https://press-start.gla.ac.uk/index.php/press-start/article/view/10. Accessed 13 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Wood, Austin (2023), ‘Debate over Resident Evil 4 remake’s yellow paint resurfaces as Devs explain just how much help players really need: “Realism is less immersive”’, Gamers Radar, 6 October, https://www.gamesradar.com/debate-over-resident-evil-4-remakes-yellow-paint-resurfaces-as-devs-explain-just-how-much-players-really-need-realism-is-less-immersive/. Accessed 25 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Yacht Club Games (2014), Shovel Knight, Los Angeles, CA: Yacht Club Games.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu, Feng (2020), ‘The freedom of alienated reflexive subjectivity in The Stanley Parable’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26:1, pp. 116–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517751389.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Zimmerman, Eric and Salen, Katie (2003), Rules of Play, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00113_1
Loading
Gamic grammar: Manufacturing consent (to whiteness) in game studies
Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 17, 17 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00113_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00113_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00113_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Black studies; critical race studies; game studies; Gamergate 2.0; hegemony; metacommentary; player subject; The Stanley Parable

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test