Skip to content
1981
Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1757-191X
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1928

Abstract

Traditionally, the works of Johan Huizinga and Roger Caillois are recognized as the foundational texts of English-language game studies. This article, however, aims to demonstrate that French-speaking scholars Jean Château and Jacques Henriot, though overshadowed by the aforementioned authors, made equally significant contributions to the discipline’s development. Through an examination of their works, the author identifies key commonalities and distinctions between pre-1997 French play studies and English-language game studies, with the latter experiencing rapid growth since the 1990s. These differences encompass contrasting approaches to the ontology of play/games (predominant in English-language game studies) versus the social dimensions and applications of play (the central focus of French-language studies by Henriot and Château). The author advocates for the inclusion of Château and Henriot in the historiography of theoretical reflections on games, thus broadening our understanding of the field’s intellectual foundations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00134_1
2026-02-24
2026-04-23

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarsand, Pål and Lemish, Dafna (2022), Children’s Digital Gaming Cultures, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarseth, Espen and Möring, Sebastian (2020), The Game Itself? Towards a Hermeneutics of Computer Games, New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aarseth, Espen (2003), Playing Research: Methodological Approaches to Game Analysis, Melbourne: Spilforskning.dk, http://www.bendevane.com/VTA2012/herrstubbz/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/02.GameApproaches2.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Abella, Adela (2007), ‘Marcel Duchamp: On the fruitful use of narcissism and destructiveness in contemporary art’, The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 88:4, pp. 103959, https://doi.org/10.1516/7R73-7181-4345-3286.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. (n.d.), ‘L’Enfant et Le Jeu’, WorldCat, https://search.worldcat.org/title/960989450?oclcNum=960989450. Accessed 19 November 2023.
  6. Atari (1972), Pong, USA: Atari.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barthes, Roland ([1957] 1991), Mythologies (trans. A. Lavers), New York: The Noonday Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baudrillard, Jean ([1970] 2012), The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanchet, Alexis and Montagnon, Guillaume (2020), Une histoire du jeu vidéo en France: 1960–1991: des labos aux chambres d’ados, Houdan: Pix’n Love Éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolter, Jay David and Gromala, Diane (2003), Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Braffort, Paul (1968), L’intelligence artificielle, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brougère, Gilles and Perron, Bernard (2013), ‘Éditorial: Pour une “French Touch” des études sur le jeu’, Sciences du jeu, 1:1, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.197.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brougère, Gilles and Perron, Bernard (2023), Préface à la réédition de Sous couleur de jouer, Lyon: ENS Éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Caillois, Roger ([1961] 2001), Man, Play, and Games (trans. M. Barash), Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Carbone, Marco Benoît, Ruffino, Paolo and Massonet, Stéphane (2017), ‘Introduction: The other Caillois – The many masks of game studies’, Games and Culture, 12:4, pp. 30320, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016685630.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Château, Jean (1954), L’Enfant et le jeu, Paris: Éditions du Scarabée.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chateau, Jean (1961), Il fanciullo e il giuoco, Firenze: La Nuova Italia, Educatori antichi e moderni.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Château, Jean (1974), Spiele des Kindes, Stuttgart: Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dovey, Jon and Kennedy, Helen W. (2006), Game Cultures: Computer Games as New Media, Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dyer-Witheford, Nick and De Peuter, Greig (2009), Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eskelinen, Markku (2001), ‘The gaming situation’, Game Studies, 1:1, https://www.gamestudies.org/0101/eskelinen/. Accessed 26 November 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Frasca, Gonzalo (1999), ‘Ludology meets narratology: Similitude and differences between (video)games and narrative’, Ludology.org, http://www.ludology.org/articles/ludology.htm. Accessed 11 August 2021.
  23. Hedjerassi, Nassira (2017), ‘Jean Château (1908–1990), le partisan de l’institutionnalisation universitaire de la pédagogie’, Carrefours de l’éducation, 43:1, pp. 10721, https://doi.org/10.3917/cdle.043.0107.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Henriot, Jacques ([1969] 2020), Le Jeu, e-book, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Henriot, Jacques ([1989] 2023), Sous couleur de jouer: La métaphore ludique, Lyon: ENS Éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hon, Adrian (2022), You’ve Been Played: How Corporations, Governments, and Schools Use Games to Control Us All, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Huizinga, Johan ([1938] 2007), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenks, Chris (2005), Childhood, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge and Key Ideas.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Juul, Jesper (2001), ‘Games telling stories? A brief note on games and narratives’, Game Studies, 1:1, https://www.gamestudies.org/0101/juul-gts/. Accessed 26 November 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Juul, Jesper (2003), ‘The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness’, in M. Copier and J. Raessens (eds), Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, Utrecht: Utrecht University and Digital Games Research Association, pp. 3045.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaczmarski, Paweł (2022), ‘A tale of two Eberts: Videogames and the arbitrariness of meaning’, Replay: The Polish Journal of Game Studies, 8:1, pp. 5382, https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.08.03.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Korzenik, Diana (1981), ‘Is children’s work art? Some historical views’, Art Education, 34:5, p. 20, https://doi.org/10.2307/3192473.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Krauss, Rosalind (1976), ‘Video: The aesthetics of narcissism’, October, 1:1, pp. 5064, https://doi.org/10.2307/778507.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kücklich, Julian (2005), ‘FCJ-025 precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry’, The Fibreculture Journal, 5:1, pp. 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lacan, Jean-François and Spitz, Bernard. (1980), ‘Joueur’, Le Monde, 1 August, https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1983/08/01/vi-joueur_2825398_1819218.html. Accessed 11 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lacan, Jean-François and Spitz, Bernard (1984), ‘Ordinateurs’, Le Monde, 15 August, https://bit.ly/3NQFSh1. Accessed 11 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lallier, Jean (1963), ‘Rôle, fonctionnement et puissance des dernières machines électroniques’, Institut national de l’audiovisuel, France, 25 January, https://www.ina.fr/video/I10343826/role-fonctionnement-et-puissance-des-dernieres-machines-electroniques-video.html. Accessed 11 August 2021.
  38. Leino, Olli Tapio (2012), ‘Death loop as a feature’, Game Studies, 12:2, https://gamestudies.org/1202/articles/death_loop_as_a_feature. Accessed 26 November 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McDonald, Peter D. (2020), ‘The principle of division in Roger Caillois’s Man, Play and Games’, Games and Culture, 15, p. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019853080.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Menotti, Gabriel (2014), ‘Videorec as gameplay: Recording playthroughs and video game engagement’, G|A|M|E: Games as Art, Media, Entertainment, 1:3, pp. 8192, https://www.gamejournal.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/GAME_3_Subcultures_Journal_Menotti.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Meunier, Sarah (2017), ‘Les recherches sur le jeu vidéo en France: Émergence et enjeux’, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 11:3, https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.036.0379.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mignolo, Walter D. (2009), ‘Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom’, Theory, Culture & Society, 26:7–8, pp. 15981, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Möring, Sebastian Martin (2014), Games and Metaphor: A Critical Analysis of the Metaphor Discourse in Game Studies, Copenhagen: IT-Universitetet i København, ITU-DS.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Perron, Bernard (2013), ‘L’attitude ludique de Jacques Henriot’, Sciences du jeu, 1:1, pp. 114, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.216.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Philippette, Thibault (2014), ‘Gamification: Rethinking “playing the game” with Jacques Henriot’, in M. Fuchs, S. Fizek, P. Ruffino and N. Schrape (eds), Rethinking Gamification, Lũneburg: Meson Press, pp. 187200.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Reay, Emma (2023), The Child in Videogames: From the Meek, to the Mighty, to the Monstrous, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Salen, Katie and Zimmerman, Eric (2004), Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schallegger, René Reinhold (2019), ‘Challenging challenge: Towards a redefinition of games’, in W. Elmenreich, R. R. Schallegger, F. Schniz, S. Gabriel, G. Pölsterl and W. B. Ruge (eds), Savegame, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 12948.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sicart, Miguel (2011), ‘Against procedurality’, Game Studies, 11:3, https://gamestudies.org/1103/articles/sicart_ap. Accessed 26 November 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stein-Smith, Kathleen (2021), The French in Our Lives: Past, Present, Future – Influence and Implications, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Triclot, Mathieu (2012), ‘Jouer au laboratoire: Le jeu vidéo à l’université (1962–1979)’, Réseaux, 173&174:3, pp. 177205, https://doi.org/10.3917/res.173.0177.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Triclot, Mathieu (2013), ‘Game studies ou études du play?’, Sciences du jeu, 1:1, pp. 115, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.223.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Triclot, Mathieu (2017), Philosophie des jeux vidéo, Paris: La Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Triclot, Mathieu (2018), ‘The role of the philosophy of technology in French-language studies of video games’, in S. Loeve, X. Guchet and B. Bensaude Vincent (eds), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 10118.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Triclot, Mathieu (2022), ‘Désir et techniques: les figures de “l’avenir des jeux video” dans la presse spécialisée francophone au tournant des années 1980 et 1990’, in S. Ammouche, A. Blanchet, B.-O. Dozo and M. Triclot (eds), Lire les magazines de jeux vidéo, Liège: Presses universitaires de Liège, pp. 4152.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ventura, Claude (1968), ‘Jeu de morpion sur ordinateur’, Institut national de l’audiovisuel, Francja, 30 October, https://www.ina.fr/video/I06191313. Accessed 11 August 2021.
  57. Zhou, Yi (2017), ‘Narcissism and the art market performance’, The European Journal of Finance, 23:13, pp. 1197218, https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2016.1151804.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jgvw_00134_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test