The (un)sustainable ecologies of self-reflexivity in Antonioni’s Zabriskie Point

References

1. Albright, Horace (1963), ‘A profile of Christian Brevoort Zabriskie by his friend Horace M. Albright’, The Pioneer, 4:97, pp. 20–23.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonioni, Michelangelo (1970), Zabriskie Point, Italy and USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonioni, Michelangelo (1996), The Architecture of Vision: Writings and Interviews on Cinema (eds C. Di Carlo, G. Tinazzi and M. Cottino-Jones), New York: Marsilio.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barles, Sabine (2014), ‘History of waste management and the social and cultural representations of waste’, in M. Agnoletti and S. N. Serneri (eds), The Basic Environmental History, New York: Springer International, pp. 199–226.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bozak, Nadia (2011), The Cinematic Footprint: Lights, Camera, Natural Resources, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brereton, Pat (2015), ‘Cinema, ecology and the environment’, in A. Hansen and R. Cox (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 258–69.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deleuze, Gilles (1986), Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, Minneapolis, MT: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deleuze, Gilles (1989), Cinema 2: The Time-Image, Minneapolis, MT: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Downing, Lisa and Saxton, Libby (2010), Film and Ethics: Foreclosed Encounters, Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fay, Jennifer (2018), Inhospitable World: Cinema in the Time of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gindoff, Bryan (1970), ‘“Thalberg didn’t look happy”: Or, with Antonioni at Zabriskie Point’, Film Quarterly, 24:1, pp. 3–6, https://doi.org/10.2307/1211137.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grønstad, Asbjørn (2016), Film and the Ethical Imagination, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ivakhiv, Adrian (2008), ‘Green film criticism and its futures’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 15:2, pp. 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/15.2.1.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Los Angeles Department of City Planning (1971), The Visual Environment of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles Department of City Planning.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lešnik, Peter (2019), ‘Michelangelo Antonioni’s images of the planet in the anthropocene’, Synoptique, 8:1, pp. 15–31.
    [Google Scholar]
16. MacDonald, Scott (2004), ‘Toward an eco-cinema’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 11:2, pp. 107–32, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/11.2.107.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Minghelli, Giuliana (2013), Landscape and Memory in Post-Fascist Italian Film, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nardelli, Matilde (2013), ‘“The sprawl of entropy”: Cinema, waste, and obsolescence in the 1960s and 1970s’, NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 2:2, pp. 431–46.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pasolini, Pier Paolo (2005), ‘The cinema of poetry’, in L. K. Barnett (ed.), Heretical Empiricism, Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing, pp. 167–86.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Past, Elena (2019), Italian Ecocinema beyond the Human, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pinkus, Karen (2011), ‘Antonioni’s cinematic poetics of climate change’, in L. Rascaroli and J. D. Rhodes (eds), Antonioni: Centenary Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 254–75.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pomerance, Murray (2011), Michelangelo Red Antonioni Blue: Eight Reflections on Cinema, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rascaroli, Laura (2011), ‘Modernity, put into form: Blow-Up, objectuality, 1960s Antonioni’, in L. Rascaroli and J. D. Rhodes (eds), Antonioni: Centenary Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 64–81.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Restivo, Angelo (2011), ‘Revisiting Zabriskie Point’, in L. Rascaroli and J. D. Rhodes (eds), Antonioni: Centenary Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 82–97.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rhodes, John David (2011), ‘Antonioni and the development of style’, in L. Rascaroli and J. D. Rhodes (eds), Antonioni: Centenary Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 276–300.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Robert, Sinnerbrink and Lisa, Trahair (2016), ‘Introduction: Film and/as ethics’, SubStance, 45:3, pp. 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2016.0025.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rothman, Hal and Miller, Char (2013), Death Valley National Park: A History, Reno: University of Nevada Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schatz, Thomas (2003), ‘The new Hollywood’, in J. Stringer (ed.), Movie Blockbusters, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 15–44.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schoonover, Karl (2011), ‘Antonioni’s waste management’, in L. Rascaroli and J. D. Rhodes (eds), Antonioni: Centenary Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 235–53.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Shiel, Mark (2018), ‘It’s a big garage: Cinematic images of Los Angeles circa 1968’, in M. Shiel (ed.), Architectures of Revolt: The Cinematic City Circa 1968, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 165–88.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Steimatsky, Noa (2008), Italian Locations: Reinhabiting the Past in Postwar Cinema, Minneapolis, MT: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Travis, Norman and Cocks, Edward John (1984), The Tincal Trail: A History of Borax, London: Harrap.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vaughan, Hunter (2019), Hollywood’s Dirtiest Secret: The Hidden Environmental Costs of the Movies, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Walker, Beverly (1992), ‘Michelangelo and the Leviathan: The making of Zabriskie Point’, Film Comment, 28:5, pp. 36–49.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Willoquet-Maricondi, Paula (2010), Framing the World: Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film, Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
    [Google Scholar]