Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Illustration
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2052-0204
  • E-ISSN: 2052-0212

Abstract

Abstract

This article considers the phenomenon of illustrators digitally mimicking traces of the handmade as ornament. It will explore whether these decorative tendencies are Adolf Loos' backward or degenerative tendency, or a generous contribution to our visual environment. It will ask why illustrators falsify the smudges, spills, textures and shadows of paper-based work within the digital workspace, what is gained and lost by doing so, and for whom? These questions will be explored in relation to interviews with two contemporary editorial illustrators and their work, to unpick the professional benefits of the phenomenon, coupled with a foray into theoretical perspectives on ornament. In this regard, the article will consider the benefit of treating ornament as labour, and also whether illustration is suffering from Herbert Read's , in order to understand what happens when these terrifying empty spaces within images are filled with introduced artefacts. The discussion will also take skeuomorphism into account to explore the phenomenon, which then raises questions concerning illustration's 'usability'. The article draws upon wildly different perspectives and practices from other fields as it seeks to consider the pleasures and pitfalls of a richly-ornamented composition, and ultimately argues that making 'noise' can be seen as a generous, temporal and critical act.

© Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00015_1
2019-12-01
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Conrads, U.. (ed.) (1971), Programs and Manifestos on 20th-Century Architecture, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017);, 'A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion's future'. , https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Full-Report_Updated_1-12-17.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2019 .
  3. Hall, S.. (2007), This Means That: A User's Guide to Semiotics, London:: Laurence King;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Meggs, P. B., and Purvis, A. W.. (2012), History of Graphic Design, , 5th. ed., Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Pevsner, N.. (1960), Pioneers of Modern Design, Harmondsworth:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Read, H.. (1935), Art and Industry, New York:: Harcourt, Brace and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertson, K.. (2002);, 'Sh*t design: An exploration of the aesthetic in graphic design'. , 10th Sights, Minds and Matters Lecture Series, RMIT University, Melbourne, 8 October .
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Sawdon, P. J.. (2005);, 'What shall I draw? Just a few words'. , in L. Duff, and J. Davies. (eds), Drawing -The Process, Bristol:: Intellect;, pp. 69-81.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Slade, G.. (2006), Made To Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America, Cambridge:: MA: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Spiliotopoulos, K.,, Rigou, M., and Sirmakessis, S.. (2018);, 'A comparative study of skeuomorphic and flat design from a UX perspective'. , Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2:2, article 31, https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020031. Accessed 30 October 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Twemlow, A.. (2005);, 'The decriminalisation of ornament'. , Eye Magazine, Winter, http://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/the-decriminalisation-of-ornament-full-text. Accessed 20 May 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Wifall, T.,, Hazeltine, E., and Toby Mordkoff, J.. (2016);, 'The roles of stimulus and response uncertainty in forced-choice performance: An amendment to Hick/Hyman Law'. , Psychological Research, 80:4, pp. 555-65.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. US Department of Health & Human Services (2019);, 'What & why of usability: Glossary'. , https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/glossary/a/index.html. Accessed 30 July 2019 .
  14. Black, S.. (2019);, 'Fibs and fripperies: References to the real in digital illustration'. , Journal of Illustration, 6:2, pp. 289-304, doi: 10.1386/jill_00015_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00015_1
Loading
Fibs and fripperies: References to the real in digital illustration
Journal of Illustration 6, 289 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1386/jill_00015_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00015_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00015_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): critical practices; digital ornament; editorial illustration; horror vacui; labour; skeuomorphism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test