Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Illustration
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Transitus: Illustration as Material Crossing Ground
  • ISSN: 2052-0204
  • E-ISSN: 2052-0212

Abstract

This article will present and analyse the results of a research workshop conducted during and after the 2022 Transitus symposium at Falmouth University. The article aims to explore our visions of physical space, travel and migration through stock landscape illustration. The workshop invited illustrators to draw a five-step sequence of images customizing a stock landscape by turning it into a view out of their window, thus exploring how a visual digital ‘airport’, a utopian hub of a stock landscape, disintegrates into particularities of individual experiences. The resulting sequences of images were put together in an online magazine about illustration, Slonvboa.ru, and are available here: http://slonvboa.ru/nonlandscape, accessed 10 June 2023. This webpage collects 30-minute drawings from fourteen illustrators based in ten countries: Armenia, Dubai, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom, with ten of the participants being based outside of their home country. Building upon the idea of the ‘nomadic illustration’ suggested by Catrin Morgan and Marc Augé’s notion of ‘non-place’, this article will explore further similarities between nomadism and the circulation of stock imagery. It will thus use the term ‘nomadic’ not only as a metaphor, but also as a direct link to migration studies and studies of digital nomadism, which often describes the precarious occupation of a migrating illustrator. This project will aim to highlight the unlikely possibilities that stock illustration may offer as a point of connection, rather than an alienating utopian abstraction. It will also analyse how individual authorial strategies deal with the notion of space, and how artistic means shape our visions of private and public spaces.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00067_1
2024-01-11
2025-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aroles, Jeremy, Granter, Edward and Vaujany, François-Xavier (2020), ‘“Becoming mainstream”: The professionalisation and corporatisation of digital nomadism’, New Technology, Work, and Employment, 35:1, pp. 114–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Augé, Marc (1992), Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity, New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachelard, Gaston (1994), The Poetics of Space, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachmann-Medick, Doris and Kugele, Jens (eds) (2018), Migration: Changing Concepts, Critical Approaches, Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayazit, Nigan (2004), ‘Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research’, Design Issues, 20:1, pp. 16–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, John (2007), Berger on Drawing, Cork: Occasional Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhabha, Homi (1992), ‘The world and the home’, Social Text, 31&32, pp. 141–53, https://doi.org/10.2307/466222.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bishop, Claire (2012), Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Black, Stephanie (2014), ‘Illumination through illustration: Positioning illustration as practice-led research’, Ph.D. Thesis, Bristol: University of the West of England.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Black, Stephanie and Vormittag, Luise (2022), ‘The storied city’, Colouring In, 2 July, https://www.colouring-in.com/images/uploads/colouring-in-issue-2-the-city.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  11. Boehmer, Elleke (1995), Colonial and Postcolonial Literature: Migrant Metaphors, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bogart, Michele (2018), ‘Making meaning of illustration’, Norman Rockwell Museum, 8 October, https://www.illustrationhistory.org/essays/making-meaning-of-illustration. Accessed 24 August 2022.
  13. Cariolle, Gabrielle (2021), ‘Rethinking sites of criticality’, Paper presented at the 11th Illustration Research Symposium, Kingston School of Art, London, 11–12 February, https://illustrationresearch11.kingston.ac.uk/programme?p=Conference2021. Accessed 24 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Casey, Edward S. (1998), The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Doyle, Susan, Grove, Jaleen and Sherman, Whitney (2018), History of Illustration, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Durrant, Sam and Lord, Catherine M. (2007), Essays in Migratory Aesthetics Cultural Practices Between Migration and Art-Making, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Eaton, Natasha (2019), Colour, Art and Empire: Visual Culture and the Nomadism of Representation, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, Merlin (2022), ‘Guest practitioner: Ruby Elliot. Week 9’, (Lecture) ILL 710 for M.A. illustration, Falmouth: Falmouth University.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Frayling, Christopher (1993), ‘Research in art and design’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1:1, pp. 1–9, https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/3/frayling_research_in_art_and_design_1993.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gabert-Doyon, Josh (2021), ‘Why does every advert look the same? Blame Corporate Memphis’, Wired, 24 January, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech. Accessed 24 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gannon, Rachel and Fauchon, Mireille (2021), Illustration Research Methods, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldin, Ian, Cameron, Geoffrey and Balarajan, Meera (2011), Exceptional People: How Migration Shaped Our World and Will Define Our Future, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grove, Jaleen (2017), ‘Illustrator as public intellectual’, The Journal of Illustration, 4:1&Spring, pp. 2–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Grove, Jaleen (2018), ‘The “theoretical turn” and pedagogy in illustration education’, Journal of Illustration, 5:2, pp. 179–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Grove, Jaleen (2019), ‘The illustration game’, Communication Arts, May–June, http://www.jaleengrove.com/words_pprs1.html. Accessed 29 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hall, Stuart (1997), Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hannonen, Olga (2020), ‘In search of a digital nomad: Defining the phenomenon’, Information Technology & Tourism, 22:3, pp. 335–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hawley, Rachel (2021), ‘Is it time to move on from big tech’s colorful corporate mascots?’, AIGA Eye on Design, 15 March, https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/the-internet-is-turning-on-big-techs-colorful-corporate-mascots/. Accessed 23 August 2022.
  29. Heller, Steven (2007), ‘Is illustration a big enough profession?’, Varoom, 4, pp. 64–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Heller, Steven and Arisman, Marshall (2000), The Education of an Illustrator, New York: Allworth Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Higman, Barry W. (2017), Flatness, London: Reaktion Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobs, Esther and Gussekloo, André (2016), Digital Nomads: How to Live, Work and Play Around the World, Amazon Digital Services LLC, KDP Print US.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center (2016), ‘Lektsiya “Postkolonialniy diskurs i sovremennoe iskusstvo” | Madina Tlostanova’, YouTube, 15 October 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w62SyCO43AM. Accessed 26 June 2023.
  34. Kaplan, Caren (2006), Questions of Travel: Postmodern Discourses of Displacement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Katt, Serena (2021), ‘Dis(embodied) – Digital encounters with place’, Remote Sensing, 30 April, pp. 50–51, http://remote--sensing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/RS_publication_A4.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2022.
  36. Köhn, Steffen (2016), Mediating Mobility: Visual Anthropology in the Age of Migration, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Korpela, Mari (2020), ‘Searching for a countercultural life abroad: Neo-nomadism, lifestyle mobility or Bohemian lifestyle migration?’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46:15, pp. 3352–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1569505.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Krasnova-Shabaeva, Masha (2022), ‘Your flight has been cancelled’, Slonvboa, 27 August, http://slonvboa.ru/nonlandscape. Accessed 18 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lauzon, Claudette (2017), The Unmaking of Home in Contemporary Art, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Levi-Strauss, Claude (1973), Tristes Tropiques, London: Jonathan Cape.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lorde, Audre (2019), Sister Outsider, London: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lugones, Maria (1987), ‘Playfulness, “world” traveling, and loving perception’, Hypatia, 2:2, pp. 3–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Male, Alan (2007), Illustration: A Theoretical and Contextual Perspective, Lausanne: AVA Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Male, Alan (2019), The Power and Influence of Illustration: Achieving Impact and Lasting Significance Through Visual Communication, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Male, Alan and Arnold, Dana (2019), A Companion to Illustration: Art and Theory, Newark, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Mao, Yue (2018), ‘The wicked utopia: Artistic creation for indigenous-inspired utopian thinking’, M.Sc. Urbanism thesis, Delft: Delft University of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Markiewicz, Lily (2007), ‘No place – Like home’, in S. Durrant and C. Lord (eds), Essays in Migratory Aesthetics: Cultural Practices Between Migration and Art-Making, vol. 17, Boston, MA: BRILL, pp. 37–48, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/falmouth-ebooks/reader.action?docID=556512. Accessed 8 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Meskimmon, Marsha and Photiou, Maria (2020), Art, Borders and Belonging: On Home and Migration in the Twenty-First Century, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Mitchell, William John Thomas (1992), The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Mitchell, William John Thomas (1994), Picture Theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Morgan, Catrin (2015), ‘The nomadic illustration’, Journal of Illustration, 2:2, pp. 245–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Nesti Willard, Sarah (2022), ‘Your flight has been cancelled’, Slonvboa, 27 August, http://slonvboa.ru/nonlandscape. Accessed 18 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Norton, Patricia (2017), The Home I Carry with Me: Utilising Drawing Practice to Map the Changing Spatial Concepts of Home in the Context of Unprecedented Human Migration, London: University of the Arts London.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Paxman, Adam (2018), ‘Eye heart theory: Not to be taken lightly’, Journal of Illustration, 5:2, pp. 225–233.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Petersen, Anne Ring (2018), Migration into Art Transcultural Identities and Art-Making in a Globalised World, Oxford: Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Posture, Julien (2022), ‘What the think pieces about “Corporate Memphis” tell us about the state of illustration’, AIGA Eye on Design, 13 January, https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/what-the-think-pieces-about-corporate-memphis-tell-us-about-the-state-of-illustration/. Accessed 23 August 2022.
  57. Poynor, Rick (2010), ‘The missing critical history of illustration’, Print, 26 May, https://www.printmag.com/featured/the-forgotten-history-of-illustration/. Accessed 22 August 2022.
  58. Rees, Darrell (2014), How to Be an Illustrator, London: Laurence King Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Relph, Edward (2016), Place and Placelessness, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Roberts, Paul (forthcoming 2023), ‘Haunting and hauntology in AI collaborative image-making’, CONFIA 2023 10th International Conference on Illustration and Animation Proceedings, Caldas Da Rainha, Portugal, 6–7 July.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Saltz, Jerry (2022), interviewed on Nightcap [TV broadcast], CNN Business, 8 July.
  62. Samuels, Allen (2019), ‘Combining design practice, education, and research’, Dialogue: Proceedings of the AIGA Design Educators Community Conferences – Decipher, vol. 2, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, 27–29 September, https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/9880vs517?locale=en. Accessed 24 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Serkova, Natalia (2020), interviewed by Ksenia Kopalova, Slonvboa, 15 February, http://slonvboa.ru/nataliaserkova. Accessed 24 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Solar Sands (2021), ‘Why do “Corporate Art Styles” feel fake?’, YouTube, 6 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFb7BOI_QFc. Accessed 18 June 2023.
  65. Sousanis, Nick (2015), Unflattening, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Spooner, Tom (2020), ‘Resurrecting place: Visual representation and the poetic imagination’, Journal of Illustration, 7:1, pp. 67–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Steyerl, Hito (2009), ‘In defence of the poor image’, E-Flux, 10, November, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/, Accessed 20 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Struthless (2022), ‘The world’s most hated art style’, YouTube, 14 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOom5YYv1qQ. Accessed 18 June 2023.
  69. Sullivan, Graeme (2004), Art Practice as Research, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Troitskaya, Irina (2022), ‘Your flight has been cancelled’, [audio recording], Slonvboa, 27 August, http://slonvboa.ru/nonlandscape. Accessed 18 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Veryeri Alaca, Ilgim and Onmus, Ipek (2018), ‘Integrating theory into illustration education: An interdisciplinary approach enhanced by artistic research in Istanbul’, Journal of Illustration, 5:2, pp. 247–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Vihn, Khoi (2018), ‘Two very different kinds of illustration’, Subtraction, 3 January, https://www.subtraction.com/2018/01/03/two-different-kinds-of-illustration/. Accessed 23 August 2022.
  73. Walke, Anika, Musekamp, Jan and Svobodny, Nicole (2016), Migration and Mobility in the Modern Age Refugees, Travelers, and Traffickers in Europe and Eurasia, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Wong, Daniel (2018), ‘Learning from the social sciences to create research methodologies in communication design’, in Dialogue: Proceedings of the AIGA Design Educators Community Conferences – Decipher, vol. 2, University of Michigan, 27–29 September, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, pp. 59–63, https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/9880vs517?locale=en. Accessed 24 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Yeo, Jesvin (2013), ‘An overview of research methods in visual communication design education’, Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 2:1, pp. 51–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Zeegen, Lawrence (2012), ‘Where is the content? Where is the comment?’, Creative Review, 28 February, https://www.creativereview.co.uk/where-is-the-content-where-is-the-comment-2/. Accessed 23 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Zinziver, Polina (2022), ‘Your flight has been cancelled’, Slonvboa, 27 August, http://slonvboa.ru/nonlandscape. Accessed 18 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00067_1
Loading
Your flight has been cancelled: Stock vector landscape as a digital non-place
Journal of Illustration 10, 153 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/jill_00067_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00067_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00067_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Alegria style; corporate Memphis; digital nomadism; digital spaces; migration; stock graphics; vector illustration

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test