Speculative illustration: From thinking with images to speculative visuality

References

1. Avanessian, Armen and Hennig, Anke (2019), Metanoia: A Speculative Ontology of Language, Thinking and the Brain (trans. N. F. Schott), London: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Avanessian, Armen and Töpfer, Andreas (2014), Speculative Drawing: 2011–2014 (trans. N. F. Schott), Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baichwal, Jennifer, de Pencier, Nicholas and Burtynsky, Edward (2018), Anthropocene: The Human Epoch, Canada: Mongrel Media.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ballesteros, Soledad (ed.) (2016), Cognitive Approaches to Human Perception, New York and London: Psychology Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bateman, John (2014), Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/ Verbal Divide, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bennett, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bould, Mark (2021), The Anthropocene Unconscious: Climate Catastrophe Culture, London: Verso Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Braidotti, Rosi (2024), ‘Foreword: A becoming-world of collective knowledge practices’, in F. Colman and I. van der Turn (eds), Methods and Genealogies of New Materialisms, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. xi–xxiii.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brisman, Avi (2018), ‘Representing “the invisible crime” of climate change in the age of post-truth’, Theoretical Criminology, 22:3, pp. 468–91, https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618787168.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cherniak, Vincent (2021), ‘No small terror: Edward Burtynsky’, Centred, 11 September, https://centred.ca/no-small-terror-edward-burtynsk/. Accessed 22 February 2024.
11. Crist, Eileen (2013), ‘On the poverty of our nomenclature’, Environmental Humanities, 3:1, pp. 129–47.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crist, Eileen (2015), ‘Choosing a planet of life’, in T. Butler (ed.), Overpopulation, Overdevelopment, Overshoot, San Francisco, CA: Foundation for Deep Ecology and Goff Books, pp. 294–301.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Crutzen, Paul J. and Stoermer, Eugene F. (2021), ‘The “Anthropocene” (2000)’, in S. Benner, G. Lax, P. J. Crutzen, U. Pöschl, J. Lelieveld and H. G. Brauch (eds), Paul J. Crutzen and the Anthropocene: A New Epoch in Earth’s History, The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol. 1, Cham: Springer, pp. 17–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82202-6_2.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Demos, T. J. (2017), Against the Anthropocene: Visual Culture and Environment Today, Berlin: Sternberg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dickinson, Andrew (2022), ‘“We all participate” – Edward Burtynsky on photographing the epic ravaging of earth’, The Guardian, 13 April, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/apr/13/all-participate-edward-burtynsky-photographing-epic-ravaging-of-earth-ukraine. Accessed 22 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Donovan, Tara (2006), Untitled (Plastic Cups), https://www.pacegallery.com/artists/tara-donovan/. Accessed 18 March 2024.
17. Gibbons, Alison (2012), Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature, New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gibson, Katherine, Rose, Deborah B. and Fincher, Ruth (eds) (2015), Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene, Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gosh, Amitav (2017), The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hannum, Gillian and Pyun, Kyunghee (eds) (2023), Expanding the Parameters of Feminist Artivism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 575–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haraway, Donna (2015), ‘Anthorpocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: making kin’, Environmental Humanities, 6:1, pp. 159–65.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Haraway, Donna (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Harman, Graham (2018a), Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything, London: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harman, Graham (2018b), Speculative Realism: An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hendee, R. William and Wells, Peter N. T. (eds) (1997), The Perception of Visual Information, New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Humphreys, Glynn W. and Bruce, Vicky (eds) (1995), Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental and Neuropsychological Perspectives, Hove: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jewitt, Carey and Kress, Gunther R. (eds) (2003), Multimodal Literacy, Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kress, Gunther (2010), Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marije de Haas (2010), Wellness Over Time, https://www.capefarewell.com/bullet-creative/. Accessed 18 March 2024.
31. McCrudden, Matthew and Rapp, David N. (eds) (2017), ‘How visual displays affect cognitive processing’, Educational Psychology Review, 29, pp. 623–39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9342-2.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Meillassoux, Quentin (2021), After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency (trans. R. Brassier), London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mitchell, William and Thomas, John (1987), Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mitchell, William and Thomas, John (1994), Picture Theory: Essays on Visual and Verbal Representation, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mitchell, William and Thomas, John (2006), What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moore, William and Thomas, John (ed.) (2016), Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, Oakland, CA: PM Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Morton, Timothy (2013), Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Morton, Timothy (2021), All Art Is Ecological, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Napangati, Yukultji (2011), Untitled, Sydney: Utopia Art.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Natal, Judy (2012), Future Perfect: Steam Portrait #28, https://www.judynatal.com/future-perfect. Accessed 18 March 2024.
41. Negarestani, Reza (2008), Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials, Melbourne: Re.press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Parikka, Jussi (2015), The Anthrobscene, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pulitano, Elvira (2022), Mediterranean ARTivisim: Art, Activism, and Migration in Europe, Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rothman, Roger and Verstegen, Ian (eds) (2015), The Art of the Real: Visual Studies and New Materialisms, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Royston, Ann M. (2019), Material Noise: Reading Theory as Artist’s Books, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Thunberg, Greta (ed.) (2024), The Climate Book, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tsing, Anna L. (2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wainwright, Chris (2009), Red Ice-White Ice, https://chriswainwright.com/2013/11/30/red-ice/. Accessed 18 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]