Illustration and Heritage, Rachel Emily Taylor (2024)

References

1. Black, Stephanie (2014), ‘Illumination through illustration: Positioning illustration as practice-led research’, Ph.D. thesis, Bristol: University of the West of England.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blaiklock, David (2019), ‘What is the nature of illustration expertise?’, in A. Male (ed.), A Companion to Illustration, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 185–98.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buchanan, Richard (1992), ‘Wicked problems in design thinking’, Design Issues, 8:2 pp. 5–21.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chand, Ari (2018), ‘Habitus, tacit knowledge and design practice: The context of the illustrator as designer’, Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chand, Ari (2021), ‘Developing a designerly way of being, or at least trying’, in C. Hight and M. Minichiello (eds), The Elephant’s Leg: Adventures in the Creative Industries, Chicago, IL: Common Ground, pp. 89–107.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chand, Ari, Howells, Andrew, Male, Alan, Minichiello, Mario, Killen, Chloe, O’Donnell, Luke and Barnes-Keoghan, Alex (2024), ‘Illustration research: Exploring the role of non-traditional research outcomes and exhibition’, in S. O’Callaghan, B. Drabsch and Z. Siang See (eds), Peer Review Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Design Principles & Practices, Design Principles and Practices, Common Ground, 19–22 January, Newcastle: Design Principles and Practice, Common Ground, pp. 7–11.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crouch, Christopher and Pearce, Jane (2013), Doing Research in Design, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fauchon, Mireille and Gannon, Rachel (2018), ‘An introduction to the manifesto for illustration pedagogy: A lexicon for contemporary illustration practice’, Journal of Illustration, 5:2, pp. 207–23.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Glanville, Ranulph (2014), ‘The sometimes uncomfortable marriages of design and research’, in P. Rodgers and J. Yee (eds), The Routledge Companion to Design Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 9–22.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Grove, Jaleen (2024), ‘What is illustration?: A shadowy definition for illustration research’, Journal of Illustration, 11:1, pp. 21–44.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hughes, Bee (2017), ‘A lost world: The missed history of illustration’, The International Journal of the Image, 8:2, pp. 69–75.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kukkonen, Karin (2011), ‘The map, the mirror and the simulacrum: Visual communication and the question of power’, in M. Stochetti and K. Kukkonen (eds), Images in Use: Towards the Critical Analysis of Visual Communication, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 55–67.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Louridas, Panagiotis (1999), ‘Design as bricolage: Anthropology meets design thinking’, Design Studies, 20:6, pp. 517–35.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Male, Alan ([2007] 2024), Illustration: A Theoretical and Contextual Perspective, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Male, Alan (2019a), A Companion to Illustration, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Male, Alan (2019b), The Power and Influence of Illustration: Achieving Impact and Lasting Significance through Visual Communication, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Melles, Gavin (2007), ‘Visually mediating knowledge construction in project-based doctoral design research’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6:2, pp. 99–111.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Saikaly, Fatima (2005), ‘Approaches to design research: Towards the designerly way’, Sixth International Conference of the European Academy of Design, University of Arts, Bremen, Germany, 29–31 March.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Salisbury, Martin (2008), ‘The artist and the postmodern picturebook’, in L. Sipe and S. Pantaleo (eds), Postmodern Picturebooks, New York: Routledge, pp. 34–52.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Zeegen, Lawrence (2009), What Is Illustration?, Geneva: RotoVision.
    [Google Scholar]