Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Illustration
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2052-0204
  • E-ISSN: 2052-0212

Abstract

While students desperately ask how to find it, educators deem it superficial; at times, a sign of artistic personality, it simultaneously indexes market niches; individual property of the artist, it also is not protected by copyright laws. Style is a rich concept whose impact on creatives is only mirrored by the lack of research on it. This paper investigates the history not of different styles but of style as a semiotic device through three key historical moments. From its role in the constitution of authorship in the eighteenth century to The Great Depression aesthetic changes to today’s theft of stylistic labour by artificial intelligence, this article suggests that style, the visual manifestation of the indexical relationship between artists and their work, has long been a tool for creatives to manifest, control and benefit from their work. The meaning and role of style for artists have changed over the centuries, from sign of the intrinsic personhood of an author to superficial sign of commercialism. This pragmatic history of style sheds light on two blind spots. On the one hand, an ethnographic blind spot was created by the illustrators themselves in their ‘theoretical turn’, leaving style to mere commercialism and framing it as the antithesis of artistry. On the other hand, the paper addresses a theoretical blind spot of history of art that has for a long time focused on style as a normative category to be defined and refined (cf. the works of Gombrich, Shapiro, Arnheim, Panofsky, Kubler, etc.) and left under theorized the pragmatics of style, i.e. what people do with the concept to control and regulate the social life of artworks.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00112_1
2025-05-31
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, A. (2005), ‘Voice, footing, enregisterment’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15:1, pp. 38–59, https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha, A. (2006), Language and Social Relations, Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Agha, A. (2015), ‘Tropes of branding in forms of life’, Signs and Society, 3:S1, pp. S174–94, https://doi.org/10.1086/679004.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnheim, R. (1981), ‘Style as a Gestalt problem’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39:3, pp. 281–90, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac39.3.0281.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogart, M. H. (1995), Artists, Advertising, and the Borders of Art, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brownlee, M. (1993), ‘Safeguarding style: What protection is afforded to visual artists by the copyright and trademark laws?’, Columbia Law Review, 93:5, pp. 1157–84, https://doi.org/10.2307/1122961.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohn, J. (1990), Creating America: George Horace Lorimer and the Saturday Evening Post, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coombe, R. J. (1998), The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law, Post-Contemporary Interventions, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ede, L. (1985), ‘The concept of authorship: An historical perspective’, paper presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Philadelphia, PA, 22–27 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Eisenstein, E. L. (1980), The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitzpatrick, W. P. (1992), ‘The hazards of extending copyright of trademark protection to an artist’s visual style’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, 17:4, p. 453.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gal, S. (2013), ‘Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs’, Anthropological Theory, 13:1–2, pp. 31–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613483396.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gal, S. (2017), ‘Qualia as value and knowledge: Histories of European porcelain’, Signs and Society, 5:S1, pp. S128–53, https://doi.org/10.1086/690108.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gal, S. (2018), ‘Registers in circulation: The social organization of interdiscursivity’, Signs and Society, 6:1, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1086/694551.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gal, S. and Irvine, J. T. (2019), Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ginsburg, J. C. (2016), ‘Proto-property in literary and artistic works: Sixteenth century papal printing privileges’, in I. Alexander & H. T. Gomez-Arostegui (eds), Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 237–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ‘Glaze – What is Glaze’ (n.d.), https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/what-is-glaze.html. Accessed 21 December 2023.
  18. Gombrich, E. H. (1968), ‘Style’, In D. L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan Co., pp. 352–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grove, S. J. (2006), ‘But is it art? The construction and valuation of illustration in Victoria’s Island illustrators society’, Ph.D. thesis, Toronto: Ryerson University.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Grove, J. (2018), ‘The “Theoretical Turn” and pedagogy in illustration education’, Journal of Illustration, 5:2, pp. 179–90, https://doi.org/10.1386/jill.5.2.179_2.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gursel, Z. D. (2016), Image Brokers: Visualizing World News in the Age of Digital Circulation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Heller, S. and Arisman, M. (2000), The Education of an Illustrator, New York: Allworth Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Heller, S. and Chwast, S. (2008), Illustration: A Visual History, New York: Harry N. Abrams.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Irvine, J. T. and Gal, S. (2009), ‘Language ideology and linguistic differentiation’, in Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell Oxford, pp. 402–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kubler, G. (1979), Toward a Reductive Theory of Visual Style, Ithaca: Cornwell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lobel, M. (2014), John Sloan: Drawing on Illustration, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Manning, P. (2010), ‘The semiotics of brand’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 39:1, pp. 33–49, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104939.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Mason, R. (2000), A Digital Dolly?, Norwich: Norwich School of Art & Design.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pang, L. (2009), ‘The labor factor in the creative economy: A marxist reading’, Social Text, 27:2, pp. 55–76, https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2008-022.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Panofsky, E. and Heckscher, W. S. (1995), Three Essays on Style, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Peirce, C. S. (1974), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Peirce, C. S. (2012), Charles S. Peirce, Selected Writings, Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pinotti, A. (2012), ‘Formalism and the history of style’, in Art History and Visual Studies in Europe, Brill, pp. 75–90, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004231702_007.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Porquet, Julien, Wang, Sitong and Chilton, Lydia B. (Forthcoming), ‘Copying style, extracting value: Illustrators’ perception of AI style transfer and its impact on creative labor’, Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Rose, M. (1993), Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schapiro, M. ([1953] 1994), ‘Style’, in Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society, New York: George Braziller, pp. 51–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shiner, L. E. (2001), The Invention of Art: A Cultural History, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Silverstein, M. (1976), Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description, Mean. Anthropol.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Silverstein, M. (2003), ‘Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life’, Language & Communication, Words and Beyond: Linguistic and Semiotic Studies of Sociocultural Order, 23:3–4, pp. 193–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Stapp, Alec (@alecstapp) (2022), ‘Not gonna lie, didn’t expect “illustrators” to be one of the first human jobs that artificial intelligence completely displaces but here we are’, Twitter (X), 6 April, https://x.com/AlecStapp/status/1511784956946784257.
  41. SVA, MFA Illustration as Visual Essay Website (2024), ‘More about the department’, https://sva.edu/academics/graduate/mfa-illustration-as-visual-essay. Accessed 6 March 2025.
  42. Taylor, C. (1989), Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Schaack, E. (2006), ‘The division of pictorial publicity in World War I’, Design Issues, 22:1, pp. 32–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ward, D. B. (2009), ‘Capitalism, early market research, and the creation of the American consumer’, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 1:2, pp. 200–23, https://doi.org/10.1108/17557500910974587.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wigan, M. (2006), Basics Illustration 01: Thinking Visually, Worthing: AVA Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilf, E. (2013), ‘From media technologies that reproduce seconds to media technologies that reproduce thirds: A peircean perspective on stylistic fidelity and style-reproducing computerized algorithms’, Signs and Society, 1:2, pp. 185–211, https://doi.org/10.1086/671751.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilf, E. (2014), ‘Semiotic dimensions of creativity’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 43:1, pp. 397–412, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Woodmansee, M. (1984), ‘The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “Author”’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 17:4, pp. 425–48, https://doi.org/10.2307/2738129.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Woodmansee, M. (1994), The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Porquet, J., Wang, S. and Chilton, L. B. (2024), ‘Copying style, extracting value: Illustrators’ perception of AI style transfer and its impact on creative labor’, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.17410.
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00112_1
Loading
How to do things with style: A pragmatic history of style as a site for debates about authorship, commodification and technological reproducibility
Journal of Illustration 12, 67 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/jill_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00112_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): anthropology; illustration history; intellectual property; semiotics; technology; visual culture

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test