Agency, voice and prosopopoeia: SeeBotsChat and the projection of kinship

References

1. @seeBotsChat ( 2017), https://twitter.com/seeBotsChat/status/817509750711545856. Accessed 20 June 2021.
2. @thatfoxdoe ( 2017), https://twitter.com/thatfoxdoe/status/818788561608654849. Accessed 20 June 2021.
3. AA.VV ( 2017;), ‘ AMA: SeeBotsChat Dev team is here to answer your questions. ’, https://www.reddit.com/r/seebotschat/comments/5nz3eb/ama_seebotschat_dev_team_is_here_to_answer_your/. Accessed 17 May 2021.
4. Barad, K.. ( 2003;), ‘ Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. ’, Signs, 28:3, pp. 801–31.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bignall, S., and Ridgey, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Indigeneity, posthumanism and nomad thought: Transforming colonial ecologies. ’, in: R. Braidotti, and S. Bignall. (eds.), Posthuman Ecology: Complexity and Process After Deleuze, London:: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Black Mirror ( 2011–Present, UK:: Zeppotron; House of Tomorrow);.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bostrom, N.. ( 2014), Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boyd, B.. ( 2010), On the Origin of Stories, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Braidotti, R.. ( 2019), Posthuman Knowledge, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Byrd, J.. ( 2011), The Transit of Empire: Indigenous Critiques of Colonialism, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cox, T.. ( 2019), Now You’re Talking: The Story of Human Conversation from the Neanderthals to Artificial Intelligence, London:: Penguin House;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ferrando, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Multiverse. ’, in R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova. (eds), Posthuman Glossary, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 265–67.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fukuyama, F.. ( 2003), Our Posthuman Future, New York:: Picador;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goodall, J.. ( 1997;), ‘ Transferred agencies: Performance and the fear of automatism. ’, Theatre Journal, 49:4, pp. 441–53.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haraway, D. J.. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harman, G.. ( 2018), Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything, St. Ives:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hoel, A. S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Metastability. ’, in R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova. (eds), Posthuman Glossary, London:: Bloomsbury Academics;, pp. 259–61.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hoel, A. S., and van der Tuin, I.. ( 2013;), ‘ The ontological force of technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon diffractively. ’, Philosophy of Technology, 26, pp. 187–202.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ihde, D.. ( 2007), Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound, , 3rd ed.., Albany:: State University of New York Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Klumbyté, G.. ( 2018;), ‘ Kin. ’, in R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova. (eds), Posthuman Glossary, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 225–28.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kurzweil, R.. ( 2005), The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, New York:: Viking;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LaBelle, B., and Thomaidis, K.. ( 2021;), ‘ Salon #2: Vocal Positionings. ’, Auralia.Space, D. Radosavljević, and F. Pitrolo. (curators), https://www.auralia.space/salon2-brandonlabelle-and-konstantinosthomaidis/. Accessed 4 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Latour, B.. ( 1996), Aramis, or the Love of Technology, London:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Laumonier, A.. ( 2018), 6|5 – La rivolta delle macchine, Rome:: NOT- Nero Editions;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Le Guin, U. K.. ( 2018), The Books of Earthsea: The Complete Illustrated Edition, New York:: Saga Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lewis, J. E.,, Arista, N.,, Pechawis, A., and Kite, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Making kin with the machines. ’, in B. Vickers, and K. Allado-McDowell. (eds), Atlas of Anomalous AI, London:: Ignota Books;, pp. 40–53.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Live Bow Wow’s ( 2017;), ‘ See bots chat they have become self aware!. ’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diMl3Nro9lQ&t=3139s. Accessed 4 July 2021.
28. Lyotard, J.-F.. ( 1991), The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, Stanford:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Macnamara, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Beyond voice: Audience-making and the work and ‘architecture of listening’ as new media literacies. ’, Continuum, 27:1, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Margulis, L., and Sagan, D.. ( 2002), Acquiring Genomes: A Theory of the Origins of Species, New York:: Perseus Group Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Milando, C.. ( 2014), Community-Controlled Games and the Advent of the Fourth Person Narrative, n.p.:: Interface Conference;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Moore, R. K.. ( 2017), Appropriate Voices for Artefacts: Some Key Insights, Stockholm:, VIHAR;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Moreton-Robinson, A.. ( 2015), The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty, Minneapolis, MN:: Minnesota University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mori, M.. ( 1970;), ‘ The uncanny valley. ’, Energy, 7:4, pp. 33–35.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Myres, J. D.. ( 2016;), ‘ The bit player: Stephen hawking and the object voice. ’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46:2, pp. 156–75.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Parker-Starbuck, J.. ( 2011), Cyborg Theatre: Corporeal/Technological Intersections in Multimedia Performance, Basingstoke:: Palgrave MacMillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Payne, N.. ( 2012), Constellation, London:: FSG Adult;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rice, B.. ( 2005), Seeing the World with Aboriginal Eyes, Winnipeg:: University of Manitoba;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. @seeBotsChat ( 2017a;), ‘ [Highlight] time to rest. ’, https://www.twitch.tv/videos/113582306. Accessed 28 November 2021.
40. @seeBotsChat ( 2017b;), ‘ seebotschat. ’, https://www.twitch.tv/seebotschat. Accessed 28 November 2021.
41. Shinkai, M.. ( 2016), Your Name - 君の名は。Kimi no na wa, Japan:: Comix Wave Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Simondon, G.. ( 1992;), ‘ The genesis of the individual. ’, in J. Crary, and S. Kwinter. (eds), Zone 6: Incorporations, Cambridge:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Simondon, G.. ( 2017), On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, , 2nd ed.., Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Stuckey, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Being known by a birch tree: Animist Refigurings of western epistemology. ’, Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture, 4:3, pp. 182–205.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tidbeck, K.. ( 2017), Amatka, London:: Vintage;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. TwitchCircus ( 2017;), ‘ seebotschat MOMENTS || A ROBOTIC LOVE STORY - Best and funny moments. ’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmazkMurF6Q. Accessed 28 November 2021.
47. u/redditsowhatever ( 2017;), ‘ How this all works, solved. ’, https://www.reddit.com/r/seebotschat/comments/5mje0h/how_this_all_works_solved/?st=IXO4TYYF&sh=93d212fd. Accessed 4 July 2021.
48. Watson, A., and Huntington, O.. ( 2014;), ‘ Ransgressions of the man on the moon: Climate change, indigenous expertise, and the posthumanist ethics of place and space. ’, Geojournal, 79, pp. 721–36.
    [Google Scholar]
49. XKCD ( 2011;), ‘ Password Strenght. ’, https://xkcd.com/936/. Accessed 4 July 2021.
50. Zeami ( 2014;), ‘ Takasago. ’, https://www.the-noh.com/en/plays/data/program_015.html. Accessed 4 July 2021.
51. Bentivegna, Francesco. ( 2021;), ‘ Agency, voice, and prosopopoeia: SeeBotsChat and the projection of kinship. ’, Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies, 6:2, pp. 149–63, https://doi.org/10.1386/jivs_00044_1
    [Google Scholar]