f Metaphors and multimodal mental imagery in immersive and stereo record production

References

1. Aksnes, Hallgjerd, Fuglestad, Svein and Amundsen, Ingvild K. (2011), ‘Bonny GIM and Jazz GIM: What’s the diff? A comparative study of transcriptions based on five selected BMGIM programs’, in Watering the Seeds, Nurturing the Gift: The 21: Conference of the Association for Music and Imagery, Techny, Chicago, IL, 21–25 June.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Askerøi, Eirik and Viervoll, André (2016), ‘Musical listening: Teaching studio production in an academic institution’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, London: Routledge, pp. 231–42.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bailes, Freya (2019), ‘Empirical musical imagery beyond the “mind’s ear”’, in M. Grimshaw-Aagaard, M. Walther-Hansen and M. Knakkergaard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sound and Imagination, vol. 2, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 445–63.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bennett, Samantha and Bates, Eliot (eds) (2018), Critical Approaches to the Production of Music and Sound, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bonde, Lars O. (2019), ‘Multimodal imagery in the receptive music therapy model guided imagery and music (GIM)’, in M. Grimshaw-Aagaard, M. Walther-Hansen and M. Knakkergaard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sound and Imagination, vol. 2, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 427–44.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bourbon, Andrew and Zagorski-Thomas, Simon (2017), ‘The ecological approach to mixing audio: Agency, activity and environment in the process of audio staging’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 11:11, https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/the-ecological-approach-to-mixing-audio-agency-activity-and-environment-in-the-process-of-audio-staging/. Accessed 12 November 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bourbon, Andrew and Zagorski-Thomas, Simon (eds) (2020), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Music Production. New York: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Braathen, Elin S. (2013), ‘Metaphor as a communication strategy within a pop music recording setting’, Ph.D. thesis, Kristiansand: University of Agder.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bremnes, Kari (1993), ‘Møte i verdensrommet’, Løsrivelse, CD, Norway: Kirkelig Kulturverksted.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bresler, Zack (2021), ‘Immersed in pop! Excursions into compositional design’, Ph.D. thesis, Kristiansand: University of Agder.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Corey, Jason (2010), Audio Production and Critical Listening: Technical Ear Training, Burlington, MA: Focal Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dalland, Cecilie, Hølland, Silje and Mifsud, Louise (2023), Observasjon som metode: I lærerutdanningene, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dockwray, Ruth, Moore, Allan F. and Schmidt, Patricia (2009), ‘A hermeneutics of spatialization for recorded song’, Twentieth-Century Music, 6:1, pp. 83–114, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572210000071.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gracyk, Theodore (2019), ‘Imaginative listening to music’, in M. Grimshaw-Aagaard, M. Walther-Hansen and M. Knakkergaard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sound and Imagination, vol. 2, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 467–88.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Howlett, Mike (2012), ‘The record producer as nexus’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 2:2, https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/the-record-producer-as-nexus/. Accessed 28 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johnson, Mark (1987), The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Johnson, Mark (2007), The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Johnson, Mark, and Larson, Steve (2003), ‘“Something in the way she moves”: Metaphors of musical motion’, Metaphor and Symbol, 18:2, pp. 63–84, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_1.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kelkar, Tejaswinee (2019), ‘Computational analysis of melodic contour and body movement’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kelly, Richard (2001), Donnie Darko, USA: Pandora Cinema.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Koksvik, Ingvild (2022), Mørketidssanger, digital release, Norway: Fyrlyd Records.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Koksvik, Ingvild (2024), ‘Staging notions of space: Realising compositional intention in 3D and stereo record production through Dolby Atmos’, in J.-O. Gullö, R. Hepworth-Sawyer, J. Paterson, R. Toulson and M. Marrington (eds), Innovation in Music: Cultures and Contexts, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Koksvik, Ingvild, Hamilton, Joel and Askerøi, Eirik (forthcoming 2025), ‘Finding the “better” in music production’, in B. Anthony, C. Boehm, T. Canfer, P. Thompson and S. B. Ward (eds), Music Production Pedagogy: Perspectives on Innovation in Music Production Education, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kövecses, Zoltán (2020), Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Küssner, Mats B., Taruffi, Liila and Floridou, Georgia A. (eds) (2023), Music and Mental Imagery, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Moore, Allan F. (2005), ‘The persona-environment relation in recorded song’, Music Theory Online, 11:4, https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.05.11.4/mto.05.11.4.moore.html. Accessed 26 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Moore, Allan F. (2010), ‘Where is here? An issue of deictic projection in recorded song’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135:1, pp. 145–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/02690401003597813.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Moore, Allan F. (2012), Song Means: Analysing and Interpreting Recorded Popular Song, Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Moylan, William (2020), Recording Analysis: How the Record Shapes the Song, New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nanay, Bence (2018), ‘Multimodal mental imagery’, Cortex, 105, pp. 125–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Negus, Keith and Pickering, Michael (2002), ‘Creativity and musical experience’, in D. Hesmondhalgh and K. Negus (eds), Popular Music Studies, London: Arnold, pp. 178–90.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nisbett, Richard and Wilson, Timothy (1977), ‘Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes’, Psychological Review, 84:3, pp. 231–59, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Thompson, Paul (2019), Creativity in the Recording Studio: Alternative Takes, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Walther-Hansen, Mads (2016), ‘Balancing audio: Towards a cognitive structure of sound interaction in music production’, in R. Kronland-Martinet, M. Aramaki and S. Ystad (eds), Music, Mind, and Embodiment, Revised Selected Papers, 11th International Symposium, CMMR, Plymouth, UK, 16–19 June, Plymouth: Springer, pp. 228–42.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Walther-Hansen, Mads (2020), Making Sense of Recordings: How Cognitive Processing of Recorded Sound Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wong, Sarah S. H. and Lim, Stephen W. H. (2017), ‘Mental imagery boosts music compositional creativity’, PLoS ONE, 12:3, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174009.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zagorski-Thomas, Simon (2014), The Musicology of Record Production, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zagorski-Thomas, Simon, Isakoff, Katia, Stévance, Sophie and Lacasse, Serge (eds) (2020), The Art of Record Production. Volume 2: Creative Practice in the Studio, New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zak, Albin J. III (2001), The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]