Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 3050-2942
  • E-ISSN: 3050-2950
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article explores the intricate relationship between human musicianship and machine music through the lens of ‘machine aesthetics’ – a concept that encompasses both music derived from machines and music that mimics these expressions. Machine aesthetics gains particular relevance in contexts where musicians replicate effects typically achieved with drum machines, samplers and digital audio workstations. By examining live performances that closely mimic the sonic elements of machine music, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of this aesthetic. Drawing on Barry Brummett’s theoretical framework from (1999), which categorizes machine aesthetics into ‘mectech’, ‘electrotech’ and ‘chaotech’, we clarify some often-conflated concepts and apply the framework to music analysis. We suggest that integrating these concepts into analyses can enhance our understanding of the causal and imaginative relationships between musical expressions and machines. This exploration underscores the interplay and dynamically perceived boundaries between human creativity and machine-driven elements in music, which continue to enrich and redefine contemporary music practices.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1
2025-10-29
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmpr/1/1/jmpr.1.1.49_Brovig.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blue Note (2015), ‘Mercury Prize nominated UK trio GoGo Penguin to release Blue Note debut Feb. 5’, Blue Note Records, 4 December, http://www.bluenote.com/news/gogo-penguin-to-release-blue-note-debut. Accessed 15 February 2018.
  2. Brøvig-Hanssen, R. (2019), ‘Listening to or through technology: Opaque and transparent mediation in popular music’, in S. Bennett and E. Bates (eds), Critical Approaches to the Production of Music and Sound, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 195–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brøvig-Hanssen, R. and Danielsen, A. (2016), Digital Signatures: The Impact of Digitization on Popular Music Sound, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brøvig, R. and Stevenson, A. (forthcoming 2026), ‘Performing experimental hip-hop: Abstract orchestra signifyin(g) Madvillain’s “Meat Grinder”’, in M. Alleyne and L. Burns (eds), Vivid Versions: Cover Songs, Contexts, and Subjectivities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brøvig, R. and Aareskjold-Drecker, J. M. (2024), ‘Vocal chops: Another human/machine hybrid’, in J. O. Gullö, R. Hepworth-Sawyer, J. Paterson and R. Toulson (eds), Innovation in Music: Cultures and Contexts, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 104–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brummett, B. (1999), Rhetoric of Machine Aesthetics, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler, M. J. (2006), Unlocking the Groove: Rhythm, Meter, and Musical Design in Electronic Dance Music, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, K. (2002), ‘The future is happening already: Industrial music, dystopia and the aesthetic of the machine’, Ph.D. thesis, Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cymatics (2024), ‘Deja Vu: Our time warping FX plugin for dream-like sound’, https://cymatics.fm/products/deja-vu-plugin. Accessed 11 June 2024.
  10. Danielsen, A. (2010), ‘Here, there and everywhere: Three accounts of pulse in D’Angelo’s “Left and Right’”, in A. Danielsen (ed.), Musical Rhythm in the Age of Digital Reproduction, Abingdon: Ashgate, pp. 19–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Frith, S. (1983), ‘Art versus technology: The strange case of popular music’, Media, Culture and Society, 8:3, pp. 263–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/016344386008003002.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanley, J. J. (2011), ‘Metal machine music: Technology, noise, and modernism in industrial music 1975–96’, Ph.D. thesis, New York: State University of New York, https://www.proquest.com/openview/2dbeff1dd471cfed47c47aa848929952/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750. Accessed 14 February 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Haraway, D. J. (1991), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Howell, J. (forthcoming 2026), Ph.D. thesis, Southampton: University of Southampton.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelly, C. (2009), Cracked Media: The Sound of Malfunction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Madvillain (2004), ‘Rhinestone Cowboy’, composed by D. Dumile and O. Jackson Jr., Madvillainy, CD, USA: Stones Throw Records.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Merhar, J. (2021), ‘Machine beats: Drumming like a computer’, Boston Drum Lessons, 18 December, https://www.bostondrumlessons.com/bostondrumlessonsblog/2021/12/8/machine-beats-drumming-like-a-computer. Accessed 29 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchell, R. (2014), in-personal interview with Alex Stevenson, Leeds, 1 December.
  19. Mitchell, R. (2018), in-personal interview with Alex Stevenson, Leeds, 23 March.
  20. Mumford, L. (1952), Art and Technics, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Peckham, M. (1978), ‘Art and disorder’, in R. Kostelanitz (ed.), Esthetics Contemporary, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 95–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Pedersen, B. S. (2009), ‘Anticipation and delay as micro-rhythm and gesture in hip hop aesthetics’, Journal of Music and Meaning, 8:2, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Red Bull Music (2013), ‘An intimate lecture w/Questlove’, YouTube, 16 May, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCxVzCe2N1Y. Accessed 1 November 2017.
  24. Sandvik, S. (2023), ‘On grids and machine rhythm: A genealogy of form’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: University of Oslo.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stevenson, A. (2024), ‘The performance of machine aesthetics: Acoustic reimagining of electronic music’, Popular Music, 42:4, pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026114302400014X.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Théberge, P. (1997), Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology, Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Turner, R. (2017), in-personal interview with Alex Stevenson, Leeds, 28 November.
  28. Underground Canopy (2024), ‘Underground Canopy’, Bandcamp, https://undergroundcanopy.bandcamp.com. Accessed 11 June 2024.
  29. Warner, T. (2017), Pop Music: Technology and Creativity – Trevor Horn and the Digital Revolution, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, B. (2017), in-personal interview with Alex Stevenson, Manchester, 16 March.
/content/journals/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1
Loading
Machine aesthetics in recorded and performed music: An analytical framework
Journal of Music Production Research 1, 49 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jmpr_00005_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): electronic music; live performance; machine music; music production; opaque mediation; technology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test