When arts and science meet: Digital technology in artistic research

References

1. Baets, Th. De, and Nijs, L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Onderzoek door muziekdocenten, is dat wel wetenschap?. ’, Cultuur + Educatie, 42:15, pp. 8–19.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernardi, V. Di. ( 2018;), ‘ Corpi e visioni nell’era digitale. ’, in V. Di Bernardi, and L. G. Monda. (eds), Immaginare la danza. Corpi e visioni nell’era digitale, Bologna:: Massimilano Piretti;, pp. 5–16.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bishop, L., and Goebl, W.. ( 2016;), ‘ Music and movement: Musical instruments and performers. ’, in R. Ashley, and R. Timmers. (eds), Routledge Companion to Music Cognition, London:: Routledge;, pp. 349–61.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bishop, L., and Goebl, W.. ( 2018;), ‘ Communication for coordination: Gesture kinematics and conventionality affect synchronization success in piano duos. ’, Psychological Research, 82:6, pp. 1177–94.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bleeker, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ What if this were an archive? Abstraction, enactment and human implicatedness. ’, in M. Bleeker. (ed.), Transmission in Motion: The Technologizing of Dance, London:: Routledge;, pp. 199–214.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borgdorff, H. A.. ( 2012), The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia, Leiden:: Leiden University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bransford, J.,, Brown, A., and Cocking, R.. (eds) ( 1999), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, Washington, DC:: National Academy Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bremmer, M., and Nijs, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ The role of the body in instrumental and vocal music pedagogy: A dynamical systems theory perspective on the music teacher’s bodily engagement in teaching and learning. ’, Frontiers in Education, 5:79, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00079. Accessed 5 October 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Buck, B.,, MacRitchie, J., and Bailey, N. J.. ( 2013;), ‘ The interpretive shaping of embodied musical structure in piano performance. ’, Empirical Musicology Review, 8:2, pp. 92–119.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Caruso, G.. ( 2015;), ‘ Music performance analysis using the motion capture System: EXPERIMENT REPORTAGE. ’, YouTube, 11 January 2017 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOmF4YeBgvY. Accessed 18 October 2020.
11. Caruso, G.. ( 2018;), ‘ Mirroring the intentionality and gesture of a piano performance: An interpretation of 72 Etudes Karnatiques pour piano. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent:: Ghent University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caruso, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Un’indagine analitico-performativa sui 72 studi carnatici per pianoforte di Jacques Charpentier (1933–2017). ’, Rivista di Analise e Teoria Musicale, 25:2, pp. 91–137.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Caruso, G.,, Coorevits, E.,, Nijs, L., and Leman, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Gestures in contemporary music performance: A method to assist the performer’s artistic process. ’, Contemporary Music Review, 35:4–5, pp. 402–22.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Caruso, G.,, Nijs, L., and Leman, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ “My avatar and me”: Technology-enhanced mirror in monitoring music performance practice. ’, in R. Hepworth-Sawyer. (ed.), Innovation in Music: Future innovations, London:: Routledge;, pp. 355–69.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chaffin, R., and Imreh, G.. ( 2002;), ‘ Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. ’, Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 13:4, pp. 342–49.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chaffin, R.,, Imreh, G.,, Lemieux, A. F., and Chen, C.. ( 2003;), ‘ “Seeing the big picture”: Piano practice as expert problem solving. ’, Music Perception, 20, pp. 461–85.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Coessens, K.,, Crispin, D., and Douglas, A.. ( 2009), The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto, Leuven:: Leuven University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cook, N.. ( 1999;), ‘ Analysing performance and performing analysis. ’, in N. Cook, and M. Everist. (eds), Rethinking Music, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 239–61.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Coorevits, E.,, Moelants, D.,, Maes, P. J., and Leman, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Exploring the effect of tempo changes on violinists’ body movements. ’, Musicae Scientiae, 23:1, pp. 87–110.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Coorevits, E.,, Moelants, D.,, Östersjö, S., and Gorton, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Decomposing a composition: On the multi-layered analysis of expressive music performance. ’, in M. Aramaki,, R. Kronland, and S. Ystad. (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS): Post-Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on CMMR, Plymouth, New York, 16–19 June, New York:: Springer;, pp. 171–189.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dahl, S., and Friberg, A.. ( 2004;), ‘ Expressiveness of musician’s body movements in performances on marimba. ’, in A. Camurri, and G. Volpe. (eds), Gesture-Based Communication in Human–Computer Interaction, New York:: Springer;, pp. 479–86.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Davidson, J. W.. ( 2005;), ‘ Bodily communication in musical performance. ’, in D. Miell,, R. Macdonald, and D. J. Hargreaves. (eds), Musical Communication, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 215–28.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Davidson, J. W.. ( 2007;), ‘ Qualitative insights into the use of expressive body movement in solo piano performance: A case study approach. ’, Psychology of Music, 35:3, pp. 381–401.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Demos, A. P., and Chaffin, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ Recurrence, mixed models, and surrogates. ’, in M. Lesaffre,, P. J. Maes, and M. Leman. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, London:: Routledge;, pp. 341–49.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Demos, A. P.,, Chaffin, R., and Logan, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Musicians body sway embodies musical structure and expression: A recurrence-based approach. ’, Musicae Scientiae, 22:2, pp. 244–63.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Desmet, F.,, Nijs, L.,, Demey, M.,, Lesaffre, M., and Leman, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Assessing a clarinet player’s performer gestures in relation to locally intended musical targets. ’, Journal of New Music Research, 41:1, pp. 31–48.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Doğantan-Dack, M.. ( 2015), Artistic Practice as Research in Music: Theory, Criticism, Practice, Farnham:: Ashgate;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dourish, Paul. ( 2004), Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dries, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ “Voyages”: Dualism in artistic research and performance of a saxophone player. An Interdisciplinary approach. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Brussels:: VUB;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Duval, E.,, Sharples, M., and Sutherland, R.. (eds) ( 2017), Technology Enhanced Learning, New York:: Springer;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Edler, A.. ( 1991), Schumann e il suo tempo (Robert Schumann und Sein Zeit) (trans. L. Dallapiccola.), Turin:: E.D.T.;
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gallagher, S.. ( 1986;), ‘ Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. ’, Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 7:4, pp. 541–54.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Godøy, R. I., and Leman, M.. ( 2010), Musical Gestures: Sound, Movement, and Meaning, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Goebl, W.,, Dixon, S., and Schubert, E.. ( 2014;), ‘ Quantitative methods: Motion analysis, audio analysis, and continuous response techniques. ’, in D. Fabian,, R. Timmers, and E. Schubert. (eds), Expressiveness in Music Performance: Empirical Approaches Across Styles and Cultures, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 221–39.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Goffman, E.. ( 1974;), ‘ The frame. ’, in C. Counsell, and L. Wolf. (eds), Performance Analysis: An Introductory Course Book, London:: Routledge;, pp. 24–30.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Guichard, C.. ( 2004), Marie Jaëll: The Magic Touch. Piano Music by Mind Training, New York:: Algora Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Haak, M. J. Van den, and Jong, M. D. De. ( 2003;), ‘ Exploring two methods of usability testing. ’, in Proceedings of Concurrent versus Retrospective Think-Aloud Protocols. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), Orlando, FL, 21–24 September, Orlando:: IEEE International;, pp. 285–87.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Himonides, E.. ( 2012;), ‘ The misunderstanding of music-technology-education: A meta perspective. ’, in G. E. McPherson, and G. F. Welch. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education, vol. 2, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 433–56.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hospelhorn, E., and Radinsky, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Method for analyzing gestural communication in musical groups. ’, Discourse Processes, 54:7, pp. 504–23.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hubrich, S. G. B.. ( 2016;), ‘ The performer’s body in creative interpretations of repertoire music. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15:3–4, pp. 337–52.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Jensenius, A. R.. ( 2007;), ‘ Action – sound: Developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo:: University of Oslo;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Klein, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ The other side of the frame. Artistic experience as felt framing: Fundamental principles of an artistic theory of relativity. ’, in S. Flach, and J. Söffner. (eds), Habitus in Habitat II: Other Sides of Cognition, Bern:: Verlag Peter Lang;, pp. 121–37.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Leman, M.. ( 2007), Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Leman, M.. ( 2016), The Expressive Moment: How Interaction (with Music) Shapes Human Empowerment, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lesaffre, M.,, Maes, P. J., and Leman, M.. ( 2017), The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. McPershon, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Magnetic resonator piano project. ’, iRCAM , 18 June, https://medias.ircam.fr/x57c686. Accessed 15 October 2020.
47. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( 1945), Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris:: Gallimard;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Miranda, E.. ( 2015;), ‘ Biocomputer music. ’, Vimeo , 10 November, https://vimeo.com/111409050. Accessed 15 October 2020.
49. Motion Capture Optitrack ( n.d.), NaturalPoint, Inc. DBA OptiTrack , http://optitrack.com/. Accessed 14 June 2021.
50. Neuhaus, Henry. ( 1973), The Art of Piano Playing, New York:: Praeger Publishers Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Newell, K. M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Change in motor learning: A coordination and control perspective. ’, Motriz Rio Claro, 9:1, pp. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Nijs, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ The merging of musician and musical instrument: Incorporation, presence and the levels of embodiment. ’, in M. Lesaffre,, P. J. Maes, and M. Leman. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, London:: Routledge;, pp. 49–57.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nijs, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Moving together while playing music: Promoting involvement through student-centred collaborative practices. ’, in S. Gies, and J. H. Sætre. (eds), Becoming Musicians: Student Involvement and Teacher Collaboration in Higher Music Education, Oslo:: The Norwegian Academy of Music;, pp. 239–60.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nijs, L.,, Lesaffre, M., and Leman, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. ’, in M. Castellengo, and H. Genevois. (eds), Music and Its Instruments, Sampzon:: Editions Delatour France;, pp. 467–84.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Norgaard, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ How jazz musicians improvise: The central role of auditory and motor patterns. ’, Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31:3, pp. 271–87.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Owens, T.. ( 1974;), ‘ Charlie Parker: Techniques of improvisation. ’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles:: University of California;.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Palmer, C., and Hutchins, S.. ( 2006;), ‘ What is musical prosody?. ’, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, pp. 245–78.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Perception Neuron MOCAP ( n.d.), Noitom , https://neuronmocap.com. Accessed 14 June 2021.
59. Pitozzi, E.. ( 2014;), ‘ The perception is a prism: Body, presence, and technologies. ’, Brazilian Journal on Presence Studies, 4:2, pp. 174–204.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Polanyi, M.. ( 1966), The Tacit Dimension, Garden City, NY:: Anchor Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Prins Stefan ( 2019;), ‘ Piano Hero. ’, YouTube , 5 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N8qK8KA3bY. Accessed 14 June 2021.
62. Rattalino, P.. ( 1982), Storia del Pianoforte, Milano:: Il Saggiatore;.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Reynolds, R.. ( 1925;), ‘ On playing the “pianola”. ’, in P. A. Scholes. (ed.), The Appreciation of Music by Means of the ‘Pianola’, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, http://www.musanim.com/Tapper/OnPlayingThePianola.html. Accessed 18 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Rink, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ The (f)utility of performance analysis. ’, in M. Doğantan-Dack. (ed.), Artistic Practice as Research in Music: Theory, Criticism, Practice, Farnham:: Ashgate;, pp. 127–47.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sani, N.. ( 2015;), ‘ Chemical free. ’, YouTube , 21 December, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHxKyVMD6pU. Accessed 15 October 2020.
66. Schacher, J. C.,, Järveläinen, H.,, Strinning, C., and Neff, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Movement perception in music performance: A mixed methods investigation. ’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Sound and Music Computing (SMC’15), Maynooth, Ireland, 25 June–1 August, pp. 132–39.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Stroppa, M.. ( [1982] 2010;), ‘ Traiettoria...deviata. ’, YouTube , 15 July, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn2FqP5MXkw. Accessed 15 October 2020.
68. Sutil, N. S.. ( 2015), Motion and Representation: The Language of Human Movement, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Tanaka, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Suspension. ’, YouTube , 30 November, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02jPgh4Cvxo. Accessed 15 October 2020.
70. Tanaka, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Creative applications of interactive mobile music. ’, in S. Gopinath, and J. Stanyek. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Music Studies, vol. 2, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 470–86.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Taylor, G. D.. ( 2014), When the Machine-Made Art: The Troubled History of Computer Art, New York:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Waddell, G., and Williamon, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Technology use and attitudes in music learning. ’, Frontiers in ICT, 6:11, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Wanderley, M. M.,, Vines, B. W.,, Middleton, N.,, McKay, C., and Hatch, W.. ( 2005;), ‘ The musical significance of clarinetists’ ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. ’, Journal of New Music Research, 34:1, pp. 97–113.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Wilson, M.. ( 1985), Drawing with Computers: The Artist’s Guide to Computer Graphics, New York:: Perigee Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Wittenburg, P.,, Brugman, H.,, Russel, A.,, Klassmann, A., and Sloetjes, H.. ( 2006;), ‘ ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. ’, in N. Calzolari,, K. Choukri,, A. Gangemi,, B. Maegaard,, J. Mariani,, J. Odijk, and D. Tapias. (eds), Proceedings of LREC 2006, Genova, Italy, 22–28 May, Genova:: European Language Resources Association (ELRA);, pp. 1556–59.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Wooley, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Built from the root, ever-changing at the bloom. ’, in A. Hamilton, and L. Pearson. (eds), The Aesthetics of Imperfection in Music and the Arts: Spontaneity, Flaws and the Unfinished, New York:: Bloomsbury Publishing;, pp. 45–52.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Caruso, Giusy, and Nijs, Luc. ( 2021;), ‘ When arts and science meet: Digital technology in artistic research. ’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 13:2-3, pp. 117–40, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00019_1
    [Google Scholar]