Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Music, Technology & Education
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 1752-7066
  • E-ISSN: 1752-7074

Abstract

This study examined the recording session management approaches of two music producers, Phil Harding and Greg Haver, to ascertain if and how their different approaches impact the outcomes of music production projects. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with each producer to gain insight into their approaches generally, and also, as a point of comparison, their work on the educational Gus Dudgeon Foundation/Joint Audio Media Education Support (GDF/JAMES) summer recording sessions specifically. Thematic analyses of the interviews revealed that the producers’ respective approaches are influenced by the genres in which each predominantly works. Harding, a pop producer, is very . Haver, who is better known for his work in rock, uses an approach. Consequently, there were some clear differences in their decision making and organizational strategies at the GDF/JAMES sessions. The producers used different criteria to choose a project/artist. Each used distinctive approaches in pre-production (i.e. work on song arrangements and other technical musical decisions), production (recording) and mixing. Still, both produced pop recordings that largely conform to pop norms. Both recordings have similar pop arrangements and meet commercial standards. Findings provide new understanding of session management techniques that can benefit both music production education and practitioners.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
2020-12-01
2025-03-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burgess, R.. ( 1994, 1997, 2002, 2013), The Art of Record Production, London:: Omnibus Press;, pp. 9–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgess, R.. ( 2014), The History of Music Production, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Case, A.. ( 2007), Sound FX: Unlocking the Creative Potential of Recording Studio Effects, Waltham, MA:: Focal Press and Taylor & Francis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlotte ( 2013;), ‘ Songbird (digital stream/download). ’, JAMES , 1 September, https://www.jamesonline.org.uk/schools/gdf/. Accessed 20 April 2021.
  5. Covach, B.. ( 1997), Understanding Rock: Essays in Musical Analysis, vol. 18, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Crandall, B.,, Klein, G.,, Klein, G. A.,, Hoffman, R. R., and Hoffman, R. R.. ( 2006), Working Minds: A Practitioner’s Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Harding, P.. ( 2010), PWL from the Factory Floor, London:: Cherry Red Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Harding, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Top-down mixing: A 12-step mixing program. ’, in R. Hepworth-Sawyer, and J. Hodgson. (eds), Mixing Music, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Harding, P.. ( 2019), Pop Music Production: Manufactured Pop and BoyBands of the 1990s, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 62–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Harding, P., and Lefford, N.. ( 2018;), online interview with the authors. , Lulea Tekniska Universitet;, 30 May.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Harding, P., and Thompson, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Collective creativity: A “service” model of commercial pop music production at PWL in the 1980s. ’, in J. Hodgson,, R. Hepworth-Sawyer,, J. Paterson, and R. Toulson. (eds), Innovation in Music: Performance, Production, Technology, and Business, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 143–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Haver, G., and Harding, P.. ( 2018;), online interview. , Suffolk:, 6 July.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Howlett, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ The record producer as a nexus. ’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 6:9, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Izhaki, R.. ( 2013), Mixing Audio: Concepts, Practices and Tools, Waltham, MA:: Focal Press and Elsevier;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Jessie J.. featuring B.o.B. ( 2011;), ‘ Price Tag. ’, YouTube , 25 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMxX-QOV9tI. Accessed 14 June 2021.
  16. Kirsh, D.. ( 2009;), ‘ Projection, problem space and anchoring. ’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 31:31, pp. 2310–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirsh, D.. ( 2010;), ‘ Thinking with external representations. ’, Ai & Society, 25:4, pp. 441–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lefford, M. N., and Harding, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Nyssim Lefford et al. Structuring the creative process: The sonic picture and production decisions. ’, YouTube , 5 September, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSE51sTNGlo&list=PL6UFkwpLwtkUz0HQ197kTsypPLaEntDTQ&index=124. Accessed 15 April 2021.
  19. Lefford, M. N., and Thompson, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Naturalistic artistic decision-making and metacognition in the music studio. ’, Cognition, Technology & Work, 20:4, pp. 543–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Moorefield, V.. ( 2010), The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Negus, K.. ( 1992), Producing Pop: Culture and Conflict in the Popular Music Industry, London:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Norman, D. A.. ( 2010), Living with Complexity: Why Complexity is Necessary, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Simon, H. A.. ( 1973;), ‘ The structure of ill structured problems. ’, Artificial Intelligence, 4:3&4, pp. 181–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Tereza ( 2012;), ‘ Robert’s Song (digital stream/download). ’, JAMES , 1 September, https://www.jamesonline.org.uk/schools/gdf/. Accessed 20 April 2021.
  25. Warner, T.. ( 2003), Pop Music: Technology and Creativity, Aldershot:: Ashgate Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Watts, L. A., and Monk, A. F.. ( 2000;), ‘ Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. ’, in J. Annett, and N. A. Stanton. (eds), Task Analysis, London:: Taylor & Francis;, pp. 55–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Zagorski-Thomas, S.. ( 2014), The Musicology of Record Production, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Zak, A.. ( 2001), The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Harding, Phil, and Lefford, M. Nyssim. ( 2021;), ‘ Pop vs rock: A comparison study of managing sessions in the recording studio and the influences of genre. ’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 13:2-3, pp. 141–61, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
Loading
Pop vs rock: A comparison study of managing sessions in the recording studio and the influences of genre
Journal of Music, Technology & Education 13, 141 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00020_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): management; music education and industry practice; music production; music production practice; music technology; musicology in record production; recording project

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test