Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 1752-7066
  • E-ISSN: 1752-7074

Abstract

Applying technology in music education is not always obvious for music teachers. Pre-service music teachers should be trained in technology-supported music pedagogy, but this requires more than isolated lessons, short projects and ad hoc support. This article reports on an exploration towards a structural implementation of digital pedagogy in higher music education (i.e. a bachelor of music in schools). This exploration was based on student-centred approaches that were iteratively developed over time and have been investigated through an action research strategy. The aim of this article is to inform about the design of the approaches, such as the structure of courses with its assignments, participants and external collaborations, and turning points and insights that steered the approach. Focus is put on the so-called technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), technology acceptance and students’ motivation. In the end, this article presents recommendations for designing education that prepares students to enhance their practice with technology: (1) adapt to your students; (2) be concrete to your students; and (3) embrace collaboration. This article concludes with explaining the value of these recommendations beyond higher music teacher education by providing examples of how these recommendations can be translated to higher music performance education.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00026_1
2020-12-01
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauer, W. I.. ( 2014), Music Learning Today Digital Pedagogy for Creating, Performing, and Responding to Music, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer, W. I., and Dammers, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Technology in music teacher education: A national survey. ’, Research Perspectives in Music Education, 18:1, pp. 215.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A. R.. ( 2007), Computers in Music Education Amplifying Musicality, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, A. R.. ( 2015), Music Technology and Education. Amplifying Musicality, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brummelhuis, ten A., and Binda, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Vier in balans-monitor 2017: De hoofdlijn. ’, Kennisnet, p. 18, https://www.kennisnet.nl/fileadmin/kennisnet/publicatie/vierinbalans/Vier-in-balans-monitor-2017-Kennisnet.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caillois, R.. ( 2001), Man, Play, and Games, Chicago:: University of Illinois Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Codarts Rotterdam ( 2020), Studiegids Docent Muziek 2020–2021, Rotterdam:: Codarts Rotterdam;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, F. D.. ( 1985;), ‘ A technology acceptance model for empirically testing end-user information systems: Theory and results. ’, doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M.. ( 2000;), ‘ Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. ’, American Psychologist, 55:1, pp. 6878, http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. Accessed 27 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Deming, W. E.. ( 1994), The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Denscombe, M.. ( 2017), The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects, , 6th ed.., London:: Open University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dorfman, J.. ( 2013), Theory and Practice of Technology-Based Music Instruction, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, C., and Robertson, W.. ( 2020;), ‘ The four phases of the digital natives debate. ’, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2:3, pp. 26977, https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.196. Accessed 17 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisser, P., and Voogt, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ TPACK-NL vragenlijst een toelichting. ’, Curriculumontwerp & Onderwijsinnovatie, 42, http://www.tpack.nl/uploads/8/0/0/1/8001167/tpack-nl_vragenlijst.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gall, M.,, Sammer, G., and Vugt, A. De. (eds) ( 2012), European Perspectives on Music Education. New Media in the Classroom, Innsbruck:: Helbling;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haning, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Are they ready to teach with technology? An investigation of technology instruction in music teacher education programs. ’, Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25:3, pp. 7890, https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715577696. Accessed 25 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holzman, L.. ( 2008), Vygotsky at Work and Play, Vygotsky at Work and Play, London and New York:: Routledge;, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203889916. Accessed 21 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Huizinga, J.. ( 2008), Homo Ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Koehler, M. J., and Mishra, P.. ( 2009;), ‘ What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. ’, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9:1, pp. 6070, https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lei, R. Van der,, Haverkort, F., and Noordam, L.. ( 2015), Muziek Meester!, , 1st ed.., Amersfoort:: Thieme Meulenhoff;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Manzo, V. J.. ( 2016), Max/Msp/Jitter for Music: A Practical Guide to Developing Interactive Music Systems for Education and More, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McPherson, G. E.. (ed.) ( 2017), The Child as Musician: A Handbook of Musical Development, , 2nd ed.., Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mishra, P., and Koehler, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. ’, Teachers College Record, 108:6, pp. 101754, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Moen, R., and Norman, C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Evolution of the PDCA cycle. ’, in Proceedings of the 7th Asia Network for Quality Conference, Tokyo, 17 September, Tokyo:: ANQ;, pp. 111, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.ezproxy2.utwente.nl/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.5465&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 26 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nijs, L., and Baets, T. De. (eds) ( 2015), Muziekpedagogiek in beweging Technologie als medium, , 1st ed.., Heverlee:: Euprint Editions;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pabst-Krueger, M., and Ziegenmeyer, A.. (eds) ( 2021), Perspectives for Music Education in Schools after the Pandemic: A Joint Publication by Authors of the Network of Music Teacher Associations in Europe, n.p.:: Network of Music Teacher Associations in Europe;, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13803.67369. Accessed 17 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prensky, M.. ( 2001;), ‘ Digital natives, digital immigrants. ’, On the Horizon, 9:5, pp. 16, https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816. Accessed 17 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Renger, W.-J., and Hoogendoorn, E.. ( 2019), Ludo Didactics Designing for Didacticians, Utrecht:: HKU Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Royal Conservatory The Hague and Codarts Rotterdam ( 2020), Curriculum Handbook Bachelor of Music in Education: Docent Muziek, Years 1/2/3, Academic Year 2020/21, The Hague and Rotterdam:: Royal Conservatory & Codarts;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schell, J.. ( 2020), The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, , 3rd ed.., Boca Raton, FL:: A K Peters and CRC Press;, http://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2225867&site=ehost-live. Accessed 3 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Scherer, R.,, Siddiq, F., and Tondeur, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. ’, Computers and Education, 128:0317, pp. 1335, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009. Accessed 21 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shulman, L. S.. ( 1986;), ‘ Those who understand: Knowledge growth teaching. ’, Educational Researcher, 15:2, pp. 414.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Venkatesh, V.,, Morris, M. G.,, Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D.. ( 2003;), ‘ User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. ’, MIS Quarterly, 27:3, pp. 42578, https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540. Accessed 27 February 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vrolijk, R.. ( 2017), Nieuw geluid, , 3rd ed.., Groningen and Houten:: Noordhoff Uitgevers B.V;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wehmeyer, M. L., and Shogren, K. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ The development of self-determination during adolescence. ’, in M. Wehmeyer,, K. Shogren,, T. Little, and S. Lopez. (eds), Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 8998, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_7. Accessed 27 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zuyd Hogeschool ( 2020;), ‘ Onderwijs-en examenregeling 2020–2021. ’, Bachelor of Music Teaching, Maastricht:: Zuyd Hogeschool;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Spieker, B. P. A.. (Benno) ( 2021;), ‘ Towards a sustainable, student-centred approach for technology-supported music education: A Dutch perspective. ’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 13:2-3, pp. 26386, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00026_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00026_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00026_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test