Skip to content
1981
Volume 15, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 1752-7066
  • E-ISSN: 1752-7074

Abstract

The social distancing reinforcement under COVID-19 seriously limited the opportunities of practising and performing for arts and music performers. While many activities can be transferred online with minimal effort, the latency obstacle in using live streaming audio software negatively affects the musicians and singers in performing or practising online. The researchers sought to integrate both asynchronous and synchronous solutions to mitigate the demand of rehearsal practices. This action research applied and examined the viability of both low audio latency technology and mobile learning applications with amateur choir members. The researchers and participants field-tested and improved the choir’s online practice by using the JackTrip Audio Device (an audio low-latency device), Sight Singing Studio and Practice Bird (two mobile apps). Using current technology, we found that amateur choir singers have opportunities to keep learning and performing ‘together’ while staying healthy from virus threats.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00053_1
2024-03-28
2024-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ABCNews (2020), ‘Australian composer Brett Dean was hospitalized with coronavirus’, 6 March, https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/australian-composer-brett-dean-hospitalized-coronavirus-69427182. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  2. Adelman, C. (1993), ‘Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research’, Educational Action Research, 1:1, pp. 724.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, C. G., Heather, N. M., Philip, D. G. and Niki, P. (2021), ‘Online postsecondary adult learners: An analysis of adult learner characteristics and online course taking preferences’, American Journal of Distance Education, 35:3, pp. 117, https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.1928434.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkins, L. and Wallace, S. (2012), Qualitative Research in Education, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O. and Lai, S.-L. (2009), ‘Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments’, The Internet and Higher Education, 12:1, pp. 16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes, J. (2021), ‘“We are still here”: The impacts of street music and street art during the 2020 London lockdowns’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 13950, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00032_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Birch, H. (2017), ‘Potential of SoundCloud for mobile learning in music education: A pilot-study’, International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11:1, pp. 3040, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080895.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Birch, H. J. S. and Brett, C. (2019), ‘Exploring a leaderboard alternative in a gamified mobile app for music learning’, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile Learning, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 11–13 April, pp. 10310, https://doi.org/10.33965/ml2019_201903L014.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cáceres, J. and Chafe, C. (2010a), ‘JackTrip: Under the hood of an engine for network audio’, Journal of New Music Research, 39:3, pp. 18387, https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2010.481361.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cáceres, J. and Chafe, C. (2010b), ‘JackTrip/SoundWIRE meets server farm’, Computer Music Journal, 34:3, pp. 2934.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cáceres, J.-P. and Chafe, C. (2009), ‘JackTrip: Under the hood of an engine for network audio’, International Computer Music Conference, Montreal, Canada, 16–21 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chafe, C. (2011), ‘Living with net lag’, Proceedings of the AES 43rd International Conference, Pohang, Korea, 29 September, http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=16129. Accessed 2 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, J. C. W. (2020), ‘Mobile composing: Professional practices and impact on students’ motivation in popular music’, International Journal of Music Education, 38:1, pp. 14758, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419855820.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clift, S. (2021), ‘Editorial’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 12528, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00041_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Crooke, A. H. D., Hara, M., Davidson, J., Fraser, T. and Denora, T. (2021), ‘Fractured bonds and crystal capital: Social capital among COVID-era music communities’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 24772, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00047_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Daykin, N., Mansfield, L., Meads, C., Julier, G., Tomlinson, A., Payne, A., Grigsby Duffy, L., Lane, J., D’Innocenzo, G., Burnett, A., Kay, T., Dolan, P., Testoni, S. and Victor, C. (2017), ‘What works for wellbeing? A systematic review of wellbeing outcomes for music and singing in adults’, Perspectives in Public Health, 138:1, pp. 3946.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Duffy, S. and Healey, P. (2017), ‘A new medium for remote music tuition’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 10:1, pp. 529, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.10.1.5_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernandes, C. and Rocha, L. (2009), ‘Enabling creative learning contexts with mobile devices: The youngsters’ perspective’, 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Education Technologies, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 1–3 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Floyd, E. and Bradley, K. D. (2006), ‘Teaching strategies related to successful sight-singing in Kentucky Choral Ensembles’, Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 25:1, pp. 7081, https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233060250010108.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Foulkes, E. (2021), ‘An exploration into online singing and mindfulness during the COVID-19 pandemic for people with anxiety and/or depression’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 295310, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00049_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hash, P. M. (2021), ‘Remote learning in school bands during the COVID-19 shutdown’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 68:4, pp. 38197, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420967008.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, C.-Y. (2005), ‘Adults’ motivation for joining amateur choirs’, unpublished dissertation, Sydney: The University of New South Wales.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. International Telecommunication Union (2003), ‘Series G: Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks: G.114’, 6 May, http://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-G.114-200305-I!!PDF-E&type=items. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  24. Johnson, R. (1996), ‘The adult student’, American Music Teacher, 46:2, pp. 1619.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Joseph, D. and Trinick, R. (2021), ‘“Staying apart yet keeping together”: Challenges and opportunities of teaching during COVID-19 across the Tasman’, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56:2, pp. 20926, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00211-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kearney, M., Burden, K. and Schuck, S. (2020), ‘Seamless learning: Mobile learning in the third space’, in Theorising and Implementing Mobile Learning: Using the iPAC Framework to Inform Research and Teaching Practice, Singapore: Springer, pp. 3950, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8277-6_4.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Keltz, A. (2021), ‘Opening Pandora’s Box? The “L” word: Latency and digital audio systems’, Whirlwind USA, https://www.whirlwindusa.com/tech-articles/opening-pandoras-box. Accessed 2 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. King, A., Prior, H. and Waddington-Jones, C. (2019), ‘Connect resound: Using online technology to deliver music education to remote communities’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 12:2, pp. 20117, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00006_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Knowles, M. S. (1989), The Making of an Adult Educator, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuehne, J. M. (2007), ‘A survey of sight-singing instructional practices in Florida middle-school choral programs’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 55:2, pp. 11528, https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500203.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lewin, K. (1946), ‘Action research and minority problems’, Journal of Social Issues, 2:4, pp. 3446.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lococo, M. (2017), ‘Variation in USB audio latency’, 7 September, https://mikelococo.com/2017/09/usb-audio-latency/. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  33. Marshall, D. (2022), ‘Windows hardware developer: Low latency audio’, Microsoft Windows, 28 October, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/audio/low-latency-audio#measurement-tools. Accessed 2 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayhew, P. J. and Coker, K. L. (2020), ‘Sight-singing habits of high-achieving middle and high school choirs’, Research Perspectives in Music Education, 21:1, pp. 2534.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ministry of Health (Taiwan) (2012), ‘Research protocol within the scope of exemption categories for IRB review’, 5 July, https://law.moj.gov.tw. Accessed 12 August 2023.
  36. Morgan-Ellis, E. M. (2021), ‘Non-participation in online Sacred Harp singing during the COVID-19 pandemic’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 22345, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00046_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Morgan-Ellis, E. M. (2022), ‘Virtual community singing during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, American Scientist, 110:1, pp. 2836.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Newton, P. and Burgess, D. (2008), ‘Explore types of educational action research: Implications for research validity’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7:4, pp. 1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Oliveros, P., Weaver, S., Dresser, M., Pitcher, J., Braasch, J. and Chafe, C. (2009), ‘Telematic music: Six perspectives’, Leonardo Music Journal, 19:1, pp. 9596.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ozdamli, F. and Cavus, N. (2011), ‘Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, pp. 93742, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.173.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Palalas, A. and Wark, N. (2020), ‘The relationship between mobile learning and self-regulated learning: A systematic review’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36:4, pp. 15172, https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5650.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Prior, D., Biscoe, I., Rofe, M. and Reuben, F. (2017), ‘Designing a system for Online Orchestra: Computer hardware and software’, The Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 10:2, pp. 18596, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.10.2-3.185_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rivas, J., Sparey, R., Davies, J., Gleason-Mercier, C., Hughes, S., Knights, S. and Cavett, E. (2021), ‘Voices from Southwark: Reflections on a collaborative music teaching project in London in the age of COVID-19’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 16989, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00043_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rofe, M. and Reuben, F. (2017), ‘Telematic performance and the challenge of latency’, The Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 10:2, pp. 16783, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.10.2-3.167_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shaw, R. D. and Mayo, W. (2021), ‘Music education and distance learning during COVID-19: A survey’, Arts Education Policy Review, 123:3, pp. 14352, https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1931597.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Slavkovic, N. and Savic, A. (2015), ‘The usage of m-learning for adult education in Serbia’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174:12, pp. 280612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.971.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, G. D., Moir, Z., Ferguson, P. and Davies, G. (2020), ‘Low-latency networked music collaborations: Does “good enough” do enough good?’, Journal of Network Music and Arts, 2:1, p. 5, https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/jonma/vol2/iss1/5. Accessed 2 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sun, J. C.-Y. and Rueda, R. (2012), ‘Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 43:2, pp. 191204, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Talbert, M. D. and Edelman, P. (2021), ‘COVID-19 and community band participation: Impacts and the road forward’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 191203, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00044_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tan, K. L. and Lim, C. K. (2018), ‘Development of traditional musical instruments using augmented reality (AR) through mobile learning’, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016:1, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055542.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tingley, K. (2021), ‘All together now: How the Skagit Valley Chorale learned to sing again amid COVID’, New York Times, 8 April, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/04/08/magazine/skagit-valley-chorale-covid-superspreader.html. Accessed 2 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ward, F. (2019), ‘Technology and the transmission of tradition: An exploration of the virtual pedagogies in the Online Academy of Irish Music’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 12:1, pp. 523, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.12.1.5_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. World Health Organization (2022), ‘Multi-country monkeypox outbreak in non-endemic countries’, 21 May, https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON385. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  54. Youngblood, F. K., Bosse, J. and Whitley, C. (2021), ‘How can I keep from singing? The effects of COVID-19 on the emotional wellbeing of community singers during early-stage lockdown in the United States’, International Journal of Community Music, 14, pp. 20521, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00045_1.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00053_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00053_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error