Hacking new musical instruments and considerations of disability in design

References

1. Aryana, Bijan, Naderi, Ehsan and Balis, Gerasimos (2019), ‘Strategies for empowering collective design’, The Design Journal, 22: suppl. 1, pp. 2073–88.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bache, Jane, Derwent, Gary and Magee, Wendy L. (2014), ‘An introduction to using assistive devices in music therapy’, in W. L. Magee (ed.), Music Technology in Therapeutic and Health Settings, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 63–82.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes, Colin and Mercer, Geof (2010), Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. bell, a. p., Datoo, Atyia, Matterson, Brent, Bahhadi, Joseph and Ko, Chantelle (2022), ‘Assessing accessibility: An instrumental case study of a community music group’, Music Education Research, 24:3, pp. 350–63.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Briscoe, Gerard and Mulligan, Catherine (2014), ‘Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon’, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30697508.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2023.
6. Cameron, Colin (2009), ‘Tragic but brave or just crips with chips? Songs and their lyrics in the disability arts movement in Britain’, Popular Music, 28:3, pp. 381–96.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Cynthia A. and Chadwick, Donna (1980), Clinically Adapted Instruments for the Multiply Handicapped, St. Louis, MO: Magnamusic-Baton.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cohen, Paul (1987), ‘The one-handed saxophone’, Saxophone Journal, 11:4, pp. 4–8.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crowe, Barbara (2004), Music and Soulmaking: Toward a New Theory of Music Therapy, Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crowe, Barbara and Ratner, Esther (2012), ‘The sound design project: An interdisciplinary collaboration of music therapy and industrial design’, Music Therapy Perspectives, 30:2, pp. 101–08.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Denzin, Norman K. (2001), Interpretive Interactionism, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dickeson, Brenda (2004), ‘The one-handed recorder’, Recorder Magazine, 24, pp. 82–86.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frid, Emma (2019), ‘Accessible digital musical instruments: A review of musical interfaces in inclusive music practice’, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3:3, p. 57.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Galletta, Anne (2013), Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goldman, Riki (2007), ‘Video representations and the perspectivity framework: Epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics’, in R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron and S. J. Derry (eds), Video Research in the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3–37.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grierson, Mick and Kiefer, Chris (2013), ‘NoiseBear: A wireless malleable instrument designed in participation with disabled children’, in NIME’13 Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 413–16, https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2013/nime2013_227.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harrison, Jacob and McPherson, Andrews (2017), ‘Adapting the bass guitar for one-handed playing’, Journal of New Music Research, 46:3, pp. 270–85.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Holmes, Kat (2018), Mismatch: How Inclusion Shapes Design, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Howe, Blake, Jensen-Moulton, Stephanie, Lerner, Neil and Straus, Joseph (2016), ‘Introduction: Disability studies in music, music in disability studies’, in B. Howe, S. Jensen-Moulton, N. Lerner and J. Straus (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Music and Disability Studies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hughes, Bill (2002), ‘Disability and the body’, in C. Barnes, M. Oliver and L. Barton (eds), Disability Studies Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 58–76.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hunt, Andy and Kirk, Ross (1997), ‘Technology and music: Incompatible subjects?’, British Journal of Music Education, 14:2, pp. 151–61.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Irani, Lilly (2015), ‘Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 40:5, pp. 799–824.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jordan, Tim (2017), ‘A genealogy of hacking’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23:5, pp. 528–44.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kvale, Steinar and Brinkmann, Svend (2009), InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lara, Miguel and Lockwood, Kate (2016), ‘Hackathons as community-based learning: A case study’, Tech Trends, 60, pp. 486–95.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Larsen, Jeppe V., Overholt, Dan and Moeslund, Thomas B. (2016), ‘The prospects of musical instruments for people with physical disabilities’, in NIME ’16 Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 327–31, https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2016/nime2016_paper0064.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Larsen, Jeppe V., Knoche, Hendrik and Overholt, Dan (2018), ‘A longitudinal field trial with a hemiplegic guitarist using the actuated guitar’, in NIME ’18 Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 305–10, https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2018/nime2018_paper0064.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lubet, Alex (2010), Music, Disability, and Society, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Monthly Music Hackathon (n.d.), ‘New musical instruments hackathon’, https://monthlymusichackathon.org/post/163742188892/new-musical-instruments-hackathon. Accessed 7 December 2023.
30. Nabb, David (2007), ‘First love’, Flutist Quarterly, 32, pp. 35–37.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nandi, Arnab and Mandernach, Meris (2016), ‘Hackathons as an informal learning platform’, in Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, pp. 346–51.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Norman, Don (2013), The Design of Everyday Things, rev. ed., New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Parke-Wolfe, Samuel T., Scruto, Hugo and Fiebrink, Rebecca (2019), ‘Sound control: Supporting custom musical interface design for children with disabilities’, in NIME ’19 Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 192–97, https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2019/nime2019_paper038.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Paul, Stanley and Ramsey, David (1998), ‘The effects of electronic music-making as a therapeutic activity for improving upper extremity active range of motion’, Occupational Therapy International, 5:3, pp. 223–37.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pinch, Trevor and Bijsterveld, Karin (2004), ‘Sound studies: New technologies and music’, Social Studies of Science, 34:5, pp. 635–48.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pink, Sarah (2007), Doing Visual Ethnography, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Richterich, Annika (2019), ‘Hacking events: Project development practices and technology use at hackathons’, Convergence, 25:5–6, pp. 1000–26.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rose, Todd (2016), The End of Average, San Francisco, CA: HarperOne.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shakespeare, Tom (2013), Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Siebers, Tobin (2008), Disability Theory, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Snedeker, James P. (2005), ‘Adapting engineering for musical instruments’, Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 20:2, pp. 89–98.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stake, Robert E. (2005), ‘Qualitative case studies’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 443–66.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Straus, Joseph N. (2011), Extraordinary Measures: Disability in Music, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Trainer, Erik H., Kalyanasundaram, Arun, Chaihirunkarn, Chalalai and Herbsleb, James D. (2016), ‘How-to hackathon: Socio-technical trade-offs in brief, intensive collocation’, in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1118–30.
    [Google Scholar]