Enough student agency? Exploring student agency and autonomy in an electronic music theory course in higher education

References

1. Abramo, Joseph Michael (2011), ‘Queering informal pedagogy: Sexuality and popular music in school’, Music Education Research, 13:4, pp. 465–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2011.632084.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allsup, Randall Everett (2013), ‘The compositional turn in music education: From closed forms to open texts’, in M. Kaschub and J. Smith (eds), Composing Our Future: Preparing Music Educators to Teach Composition, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–73.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alvesson, Mats and Sköldberg, Kaj (2018), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Armstrong, Victoria (2011), Technology and the Gendering of Music Education, Burlington: Ashgate.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashwin, Paul (2021), ‘How student-centered learning and teaching can obscure the importance of knowledge in educational processes and why it matters’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemenčič (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 65–74.
   [Google Scholar]
6. bell, adam patrick (2014), ‘Trial-by-fire: A case study of the musician–engineer hybrid role in the home studio’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7:3, pp. 295–312, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.7.3.295_1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biesta, Gert (2010), Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biesta, Gert (2017), The Rediscovery of Teaching, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Biesta, Gert (2022), World-Centred Education: A View for the Present, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bovill, Catherine and Woolmer, Cherie (2019), ‘How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum’, Higher Education, 78:3, pp. 407–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bowden, Jana Lay-Hwa, Tickle, Leonie and Naumann, Kay (2021), ‘The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 46:6, pp. 1207–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bowman, Wayne (2002), ‘Educating musically’, in R. Colwell and C. Richardson (eds), The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning: A Project of the Music Educators National Conference, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–84.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brinkmann, Svend (2018), ‘The interview’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 997–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brown, Andrew R. (2015), Music Technology and Education: Amplifying Musicality, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Burgess, Richard James (2013), The Art of Music Production: The Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Burnard, Pamela (2007), ‘Creativity and technology: Critical agents of change in the work and lives of music teacher’, in J. Finney and P. Burnard (eds), Music Education with Digital Technology, London: Continuum, pp. 196–206.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Carr, Wilfred and Kemmis, Stephen (1986), Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research, London: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Clements, Ann C. (2012), ‘Escaping the classroom canon: Changing methods through a change of paradigm’, in S. Karlsen and L. Väkevä (eds), Future Prospects for Music Education: Corroborating Informal Learning Pedagogy, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cook-Sather, Alison, Bovill, Catherine and Felten, Peter (2014), Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dyndahl, Petter, Karlsen, Sidsel, Skårberg, Odd and Nielsen, Siw Graabraek (2014), ‘Cultural omnivorousness and musical gentrification: An outline of a sociological framework and its applications for music education research’, Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 13:1, pp. 40–69.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Eno, Brian (2004), ‘The studio as compositional tool’, in C. Cox and D. Warner (eds), Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music, New York: Continuum, pp. 127–30.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ewell, Philip A. (2020), ‘Music theory and the white racial frame’, Music Theory Online, 26:2, pp. 59–87, https://doi.org/10.30535/mto.26.2.4.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Folkestad, Göran (1996), Computer Based Creative Music Making: Young People’s Music in the Digital Age, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Folkestad, Göran (2006), ‘Formal and informal learning situations or practices vs formal and informal ways of learning’, British Journal of Music Education, 23:2, pp. 135–45, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051706006887.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Folkestad, Göran, Hargreaves, David J. and Lindström, Berner (1998), ‘Compositional strategies in computer-based music-making’, British Journal of Music Education, 15:1, pp. 83–97, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051700003788.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Georgii-Hemming, Eva and Westvall, Maria (2010), ‘Music education – a personal matter? Examining the current discourses of music education in Sweden’, British Journal of Music Education, 27:1, pp. 21–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051709990179.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gravett, Karen, Kinchin, Ian M. and Winstone, Naomi E. (2019), ‘“More than customers”: Conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders’, Studies in Higher Education, 45:12, pp. 2574–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Green, Lucy (2002), How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education, Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Green, Lucy (2008), Music, Informal Learning and the School: A New Classroom Pedagogy, Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hess, Juliet (2019), ‘Popular music education: A way forward, or a new hegemony?’, in Z. Moir, B. Powell and G. D. Smith (eds), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Popular Music Education: Perspectives and Practices, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 29–43.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hoel, Torlaug Løkensgard (2000), ‘Forskning i eget klasserom: Noen praktisk-metodiske dilemma av etisk karakter’, Nordisk Pedagogik, 20:3, pp. 160–70.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hoidn, Sabine and Reusser, Keusser (2021), ‘Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemenčič (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 17–46.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hunter, Mark (2019), ‘Considering techne in popular music education: Value systems in popular music curricula’, in Z. Moir, B. Powell and G. D. Smith (eds), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Popular Music Education: Perspectives and Practices, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 45–57.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hugill, Andrew (2019), The Digital Musician, 3rd ed., Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Klemenčič, Manja (2021), ‘Students as actors and agents in student-centered higher education’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemenčič (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 92–108.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kvale, Steinar (2007), Doing Interviews, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lebler, Don (2013), ‘Using formal self- and peer-assessment as a proactive tool in building a collaborative learning environment: Theory into practice in a popular music programme’, in H. Gaunt and H. Westerlund (eds), Collaborative Learning in Higher Music Education, London: Routledge, pp. 111–21.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lebler, Don and Hodges, Naomi (2017), ‘Popular music pedagogy: Dual perspectives on DIY musicianship’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, London: Routledge, pp. 272–84.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lebler, Don and Weston, Donna (2015), ‘Staying in sync: Keeping popular music pedagogy relevant to an evolving music industry’, Journal of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music, 5:1, pp. 124–38, https://doi.org/10.5429/2079-3871(2015)v5i1.8en.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lilliedahl, Jonathan (2015), ‘The recontextualisation of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics’, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015:1, pp. 40–47, https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27008.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Matthews, Michael R. (2021), ‘Philosophical problems with constructivism: Some considerations for student-centered learning and teaching’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemenčič (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McKenna, Sioux and Quinn, Lynn (2021), ‘Misconceptions and misapplications of student-centered approaches’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemenčič (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 109–20.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Nicol, David J. and Macfarlane-Dick, Debra (2006), ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, pp. 199–218, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Norton, Lin (2009), Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Partti, Heidi (2014), ‘Cosmopolitan musicianship under construction: Digital musicians illuminating emerging values in music education’, International Journal of Music Education, 32:1, pp. 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411433727.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rogers, Michael R. (2004), Teaching Approaches in Music Theory: An Overview of Pedagogical Philosophies, 2nd ed., Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Røshol, Andreas Waaler (2024), ‘Putting the ego aside: A case study of the peer-to-peer feedback dialogue among electronic popular music makers within higher education’, Journal of Popular Music Education, 8:3, pp. 293–317, https://doi.org/10.1386/jpme_00134_1.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Røshol, Andreas Waaler and Sørbø, Eirik (2020), ‘Making music, finishing music: An inquiry into the music-making practice of popular electronic music students in the “laptop-era”’, in Ø. J. Eiksund, E. Angelo and J. Knigge (eds), Music Technology in Education: Channeling and Challenging Perspectives, Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 151–78.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Slater, Mark (2016), ‘Processes of learning in the project studio’, in A. King and E. Himonides (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 9–26.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sørbø, Eirik and Røshol, Andreas Waaler (2020), ‘Teaching aesthetics: A case study of one-to-one tuition in popular electronic music in higher education’, in Ø. J. Eiksund, E. Angelo and J. Knigge (eds), Music Technology in Education: Channeling and Challenging Perspectives, Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 257–78.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Stake, Robert E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Till, Rupert (2017), ‘Popular music education: A step into the light’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, London: Routledge, pp. 14–30.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tobias, Evan S. (2013), ‘Composing, songwriting, and producing: Informing popular music pedagogy’, Research Studies in Music Education, 35:2, pp. 213–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x13487466.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Topping, Keith (1998), ‘Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities’, Review of Educational Research, 68:3, pp. 249–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/1170598.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Utne-Reitan, Bjørnar (2022), Harmony in Conservatoire Education: A Study in the History of Music Theory in Norway, Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music, https://nmh.no/en/research/publications/harmony-conservatoire-education. Accessed 1 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wenger, Etienne (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]