Learning from the history of alternative communication networks | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Alternative & Community Media
  4. Volume 5, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2634-4726
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article explores the legal, economic and governance challenges to the sustainability of contemporary alternative Community Networks by drawing lessons and parallels from eight historical precedents. Building on academic literature related to alternative and community media, the article lays out an encompassing definition of alternative networks (or ‘alternets’) and develops a multidisciplinary approach to comparative history. After briefly presenting eight case studies (three independent telephone networks of the late nineteenth century; three Free Radios of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s; two Community Networks providing Internet access in the 1990s), the article then draws from these case studies to identify key recurring challenges that can inform present-day initiatives, namely, the articulation of local community with global connectivity, the development of political advocacy capacities aimed at influencing the law and technology, the creation of appropriate resources aimed at resisting co-optation, and the need to build collective cohesion and mechanisms to handle disagreements.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The European Commission, H2020-ICT-2015 Programme (Award 688768)
© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
2020-04-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/joacm/5/1/joacm.5.1.9.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/joacm_00072_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Acland, C. R.. ( 2006), Residual Media, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Atton, C.. ( 2005), An Alternative Internet: Radical Media, Politics and Creativity, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, O. G.,, Cammaerts, B., and Carpentier, N.. ( 2008), Understanding Alternative Media, Maidenhead:: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benkler, Y.. ( 2016;), ‘ Degrees of freedom, dimensions of power. ’, Daedalus, 145:1, pp. 18–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bijker, W. E.,, Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T.. ( 1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyle, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. ’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66:1&2, pp. 33–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinson, P.. ( 2006;), ‘ Liberation frequency: The Free Radio movement and alternative strategies of media relations. ’, Sociological Quarterly, 47:4, pp. 543–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardon, D., and Granjon, F.. ( 2010), Médiactivistes, Paris:: Presses de Sciences Po;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey, J.. ( 1989), Communication as Culture, Boston, MA:: Unwin Hyman;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Couldry, N.. ( 2015;), ‘ Alternative media and voice. ’, in C. Atton. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, London:: Routledge;, pp. 43–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Deflem, M., and Lee Dove, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Historical research and social movements. ’, in D. A. Snow,, D. Della Porta,, B. Klandermans, and D. McAdam. (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, Malden, MA:: Wiley Blackwell;, pp. 560–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dulong de Rosnay, M., and Musiani, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ Towards a (de)centralisation-based typology of peer production. ’, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 14:1, pp. 189–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Enzensberger, H. M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Constituents of a theory of the media. ’, in N. Wardrip-Fruin. (ed.), The New Media Reader, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 261–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Filippi, P. De, and Tréguer, F.. ( 2015;), ‘ Expanding the Internet commons: The subversive potential of wireless community networks. ’, Journal of Peer Production, 6, http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewed-articles/expanding-the-internet-commons-the-subversive-potential-of-wireless-community-networks/. Accessed 17 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Frischmann, B. M.. ( 2007;), ‘ Infrastructure commons in economic perspective. ’, First Monday, 12:6, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i6.1901.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuchs, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Alternative media as critical media. ’, European Journal of Social Theory, 13:2, pp. 173–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabel, R.. ( 1969;), ‘ The early competitive era in telephone communication, 1893-1920. ’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 34:2, pp. 340–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hardin, G.. ( 1968;), ‘ The tragedy of the commons. ’, Science, 162:3859, pp. 1243–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hesmondhalgh, D.. ( 2007), The Cultural Industries, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hess, C., and Ostrom, E.. ( 2007), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Holcombe, A. N.. ( 1911), Public Ownership of Telephones on the Continent of Europe, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaijser, A.. ( 1987;), ‘ From local networks to national systems: A comparison of the emergence of electricity and telephony in Sweden. ’, in F. Cardot. (ed.), 1880-1980: Un siècle d’électricité dans le monde, Paris:: Presses universitaires de France;, pp. 7–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kostakis, V., and Bauwens, M.. ( 2014), Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lasar, M.. ( 1999), Pacifica Radio: The Rise of and Alternative Network, Philadelphia, PA:: Temple University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lefebvre, T.. ( 2011), La bataille des radios libres (1977-1981), Paris:: Nouveau Monde Éditions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lessig, L.. ( 1999), Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York:: Basic Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Loraux, N.. ( 2005;), ‘ Éloge de l’anachronisme en histoire. ’, Espaces Temps, 87, pp. 127–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. MacKenzie, A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Untangling the unwired Wi-Fi and the cultural inversion of infrastructure. ’, Space and Culture, 8:3, pp. 269–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahoney, J., and Rueschemeyer, D.. ( 2003), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N.. ( 1977;), ‘ Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. ’, American Journal of Sociology, 82:6, pp. 1212–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McChesney, R. W.. ( 2007), Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media, New York:: New Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McChesney, R. W.. ( 2013), Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy, New York:: New Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Medosch, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ The rise of the network commons. ’, Next Layer, 9 May, http://www.thenextlayer.org/NetworkCommons.html. Accessed 1 December 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Milan, S.. ( 2013), Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring Social Change, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Navarro, L.,, Baig, R.,, Freitag, F.,, Dimogerontakis, E.,, Tréguer, F.,, Dulong de Rosnay, M.,, Maccari, L.,, Micholia, P., and Antoniadis, P.. ( 2016;), ‘ Report on the existing community networks and their organization. ’, netCommons, 12 October, https://www.netcommons.eu/sites/default/files/netcommons_d1.2v1.0.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Papadimitropoulos, V.. ( 2017;), ‘ The politics of the commons: Reform or revolt?. ’, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15:2, pp. 565–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pickard, V.. ( 2013;), ‘ The air belongs to the people: The rise and fall of a postwar radio movement. ’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30:4, pp. 307–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Pickard, V.. ( 2015a), America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Pickard, V.. ( 2015b;), ‘ Media activism from above and below: Lessons from the 1940s American reform movement. ’, Journal of Information Policy, 5, pp. 109–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Powell, A.. ( 2008;), ‘ WiFi publics: Producing community and technology. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 11:8, pp. 1068–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Preston, P.. ( 2001), Reshaping Communications: Technology, Information and Social Change, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Raboy, M.. ( 1993;), ‘ Radio as emancipatory cultural practice. ’, in N. Strauss, and D. Mandl. (eds), Radiotext(e), New York:: Semiotexte;, pp. 129–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sandoval, M., and Fuchs, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Towards a critical theory of alternative media. ’, Telematics and Informatics, 27:2, pp. 141–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Tilly, C., and Tarrow, S.. ( 2015), Contentious Politics, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tréguer, F.. ( 2017;), ‘ Gaps and bumps in the political history of the Internet. ’, Internet Policy Review, 6:4, https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.714.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tréguer, F.,, Antoniadis, P., and Söderberg, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Alt. vs. Ctrl.: Editorial notes for the JoPP issue on alternative internets. ’, Journal of Peer Production, 9, http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-9-alternative-internets/editorial-notes/. Accessed 17 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tréguer, F., and Dulong de Rosnay, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Community networks and political advocacy. ’, Research Report, D1.5, ISCC-CNRS, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01792045/document. Accessed 1 December 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tréguer, F., and Trudel, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ From Internet access provision to digital right activism: The history of the French data network. ’, Histoire et informatique, 21, pp. 35–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Trudel, D., and Tréguer, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ Alternative communication networks throughout history. ’, netCommons, 30 November, https://www.netcommons.eu/sites/default/files/d5.1_history_v1.0.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wall, D.. ( 2014), The Commons in History: Culture, Conflict, and Ecology, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, T.. ( 2010), The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, New York:: Alfred A. Knopf;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tréguer, Félix,, Trudel, Dominique, and Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie. ( 2020;), ‘ Learning from the history of alternative communication networks. ’, Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 5:1, pp. 9–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
Loading
Learning from the history of alternative communication networks
Journal of Alternative & Community Media 5, 9 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
/content/journals/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
/content/journals/10.1386/joacm_00072_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): advocacy; alternative networks; commons; Community Networks; Free Radio; Internet; telecom regulation; telephone

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error