1981
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

Many contemporary screenplay manuals, following Syd Field, encourage writers to place an act break approximately three-quarters of the way through the story. Although this would appear to be an area of widespread agreement, this essay argues that the manuals do not always define the 3/4-point in the same way. One common approach is to define the 3/4-point as a causally significant plot point; another approach is to regard it as an extreme point on an emotional curve, typically the darkest moment; and a third approach is to conceive of the 3/4-point as the answer to a previously introduced question. Taking a closer look at these three competing models of the 3/4-point can help us uncover the manuals' competing assumptions about narrative structure, showing how they conceptualize causality, emotion and comprehension.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc.2.1.85_1
2011-01-01
2023-07-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/josc.2.1.85_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): causality; emotion; interest; screenplay manuals; three-act structure
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error