Skip to content
1981
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

Abstract

The British original Life on Mars, the spin-off Ashes to Ashes, and the American remake of Life on Mars offered divergent endings to the same premise, and each series finale divided viewer opinion to varying degrees. This article discusses these three different endings and considers how the writers of each series framed explanations for their creative decisions in discourse surrounding the finales. The article’s analysis illustrates that the series writers strove to justify their narrative resolutions strategically at various points in each series run to account for potential public reaction and to frame their writing decisions as driven primarily by creative motivations, not industrial ones. As such, the article suggests that writers of television finales, particularly those that close off serialized shows, have more opportunity and pressure than ever before to enter into dialogue with emboldened audiences about the production process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc.6.2.173_1
2015-06-01
2024-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc.6.2.173_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error