Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

Julie Grossman’s term ‘elasTEXTity’ describes sources and adaptations that have a flexibility that represents change rather than a rigid relationship between immovable objects. When matched with Jamie Sherry’s argument that the screenplay is ‘liminal’, Grossman’s framing is usefully applied to adaptation screenwriting to describe a ‘liminal elastextual catalyst’ for either syntagmatic, ‘plastextual’ and derivative adaptations, or ones that are paradigmatic, ‘elastextual’ and innovative. This framing is particularly compelling for adaptations of the 1960s and 1970s from the ‘liminal’ Soviet Republics, as evidenced in two readings of an Estonian narrative. One is non-paradigmatically focused on political borders, while the other paradigmatically describes a motivic chronotope lodged in the notion of liminality, the Bakhtinian Threshold Chronotope and the notion of transgredience that reflects realistic human characteristics. Rather than a syntagmatic transposition of people, places and actions, the latter reading is more ‘elastextual’ in holding potential for a welcome substantial challenge to the primacy, integrity and identity of the source text.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00084_1
2022-04-01
2026-04-21

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrew, Dudley. ( 1984;), ‘ Adaptation. ’, in D. Andrew. (ed.), Concepts in Film Theory, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 96–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Babb, Genie. ( 2002;), ‘ Where the bodies are buried: Cartesian dispositions in narrative theories of character. ’, Narrative, 10:3, pp. 195–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.. ( [1981] 2020;), ‘ Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. ’, in M. Holquist. (ed.), C. Emerson, and M. Holquist. (trans.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Austin, TX:: University of Texas Press;, pp. 84–258.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaton, Roderick. ( 2010;), ‘ Historical poetics: Chronotopes in “Leucippe and Clitophon” and “Tom Jones”. ’, in N. Bemong,, P. Borghart,, M. De Dobbeleer,, K. Demoen,, K. De Temmerman, and B. Keunen. (eds), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives, Gent:: Academia Press;, pp. 59–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bemong, Nele. ( 2010;), ‘ Internal chronotopic genre structures: The nineteenth-century historical novel in the context of the belgian literary polysystem. ’, in N. Bemong,, P. Borghart,, M. De Dobbeleer,, K. Demoen,, K. De Temmerman, and B. Keunen. (eds), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives, Gent:: Academia Press;, pp. 159–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bemong, Nele, and Borghart, Pieter., ( 2010;), ‘ Bakhtin’s theory of the literary chronotope: reflections, applications, perspectives. ’, in N. Bemong,, P. Borghart,, M. De Dobbeleer,, K. Demoen,, K. De Temmerman, and B. Keunen. (eds), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives, Gent:: Academia Press;, pp. 3–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Caracciolo, Marco,, Guédon, Cécile,, Kukkonen, Karin, and Müller, Sabine. ( 2017;), ‘ The promise of an embodied narratology: Integrating cognition, representation and interpretation. ’, in P. K. Hansen,, J. Pier,, P. Roussin, and W. Schmid. (eds), Emerging Vectors of Narratology, Berlin and Boston, MA:: De Gruyter;, pp. 435–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Eco, Umberto. ( 1972;), ‘ Towards a semiotic inquiry into the television message. ’, in P. Splendore. (trans.), Working Papers in Cultural Studies, vol. 3, Birmingham:: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham; pp. 103–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Elliott, Kamilla. ( 2003), Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Genette, Gérard. ( 1997), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (trans. C. Newman, and C. Doubinsky.), Lincoln, NE:: University of Nebraska Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Grossman, Julie. (ed.) ( 2015), Literature, Film, and Their Hideous Progeny: Adaptation and ElasTEXTity, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, Stuart. ( [1973] 1980;), ‘ Encoding/decoding. ’, in S. Hall,, D. Hobson,, A. Lowe, and P. Willis. (eds), Culture, Media, Language, London:: Hutchinson;, pp. 128–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hetherington, Kevin. ( 1996;), ‘ Identity formation, space and social centrality. ’, Theory, Culture & Society, 13:4, pp. 33–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Holquist, Michael., ( 2010;), ‘ The Fugue of Chronotope. ’, in N. Bemong,, P. Borghart,, M. De Dobbeleer,, K. Demoen,, K. De Temmerman, and B. Keunen. (eds), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives, Gent:: Academia Press;, pp. 19–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard-Grenville, Jennifer,, Golden-Biddle, Karen,, Irwin, Jennifer, and Mao, Jina. ( 2011;), ‘ Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. ’, Organization Science, 22:2, pp. 522–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hutchings, Stephen, and Vernitskaia, Anat. ( 2004), Russian and Soviet Film Adaptations of Literature, 1900–2001: Screening the Word, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalm, Mart. ( 2008;), ‘ Ons linnaelu maal hea? Majandi keskasula Eesti NSV-s (“Is urban life in the countryside good? The central settlements of collective farms in the Estonian SSR”). ’, Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi (Studies in Art and Architecture/Studien für Kunstwissenschaft), 17:4, pp. 61–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Leitch, Thomas. ( 2003;), ‘ Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. ’, Criticism, 45:2, pp. 149–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Leitch, Thomas. ( 2007), Film Adaptation and Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to the Passion of the Christ, Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Leitch, Thomas. ( 2008;), ‘ Adaptation, the genre. ’, Adaptation, 1:2, pp. 106–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Leitch, Thomas. ( 2016;), ‘ Across the Russian border. ’, in A. Burry, and F. White. (eds), Border Crossing: Russian Literature into Film, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;, pp. 17–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Leitch, Thomas. ( 2017;), ‘ Enough about adaptation: Let’s talk about adapting: Review: Literature, film, and their hideous progeny: Adaptation and ElasTEXTity by Julie Grossman. ’, Criticism Summer, 59:3, pp. 507–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Leder, Drew. ( 1990), The Absent Body, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Leder, Drew. ( 1999;), ‘ Flesh and blood: A proposed supplement to Merleau-Ponty. ’, in D. Welton. (ed.), The Body: Classic and Contemporary Readings, Malden, MA:: Blackwell Publishers;, pp. 200–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mäeküla Piimamees ( 1965), Voldemar Panso (wr.), Leida Laius (dir.) , Soviet Estonia:: Tallinnfilm;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Meyers, Mark. ( 2008;), ‘ Liminality and the problem of being-in-the-world: Reflections on Sartre and Merleau Ponty. ’, Sartre Studies International, 14:1, pp. 78–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Merilai, Arne. ( 2014;), ‘ The ages of Dickens in Estonian literature: Some comparative perspectives with a Marxist exposure. ’, Interlitteraria, 19:2, pp. 372–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Merilai, Arne. ( 2018;), ‘ The double-tongued author: Re-reading Sophocles, Thomas Hardy, and Eduard Vilde. ’, Interlitteraria, 23:2, pp. 321–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( [1945] 1962), Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith.), New York:: Humanities Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Morson, Gary Saul, and Emerson, Caryl. ( 1990), Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Näripea, Eva. ( 2010;), ‘ Nature, movement, liminality: Representing the space of the nation in 1960’s Estonian cinema. ’, Regioninės studijos, 5, pp. 89–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Scholz, Bernhard F.. ( 2003;), ‘ Bakhtin’s concept of “chronotope”: The Kantian connection. ’, in M. E. Gardiner. (ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin (Sage Masters of Modern Social Thought), vol. 2, London:: Sage;, pp. 145–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sherry, Jamie. ( 2016;), ‘ Adaptation studies through screenwriting studies: Transitionality and the adapted screenplay. ’, Journal of Screenwriting, 7:1, pp. 11–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. St John, Graham. ( 2001;), ‘ Alternative cultural heterotopia and the liminoid body: Beyond Turner at ConFest. ’, Australian Journal of Anthropology, 12:1, pp. 47–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Szakolczai, Arpad. ( 2009;), ‘ Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. ’, International Political Anthropology, 2:1, pp. 141–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Szakolczai, Arpad. ( 2017;), ‘ Permanent (trickster) liminality: The reasons of the heart and of the mind. ’, Theory & Psychology, 27:2, pp. 231–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomassen, Bjørn. ( 2009;), ‘ The uses and meanings of liminality. ’, International Political Anthropology, 2:1, pp. 5–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomassen, Bjørn. ( 2016), Liminality and the Modern: Living through the In-Between, New York and London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Turner, Victor. ( 1967), The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Turner, Victor. ( 1968;), ‘ Myth and symbol. ’, in D. Sills. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York:: Macmillan & The Free Press;, pp. 576–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Turner, Victor. ( 1974;), ‘ Liminal to liminoid in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. ’, Rice University Studies, 60:3, pp. 53–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner, Victor. ( 1979;), ‘ Frame, flow and reflection: Ritual and drama as public liminality. ’, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6:4, pp. 465–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. van Gennep, Arnold. ( [1909] 1960), The Rites of Passage, London:: Routledge & Kegan Paul;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Vilde, Eduard. ( [1916] 1976), Milkman of the Manor (trans. M. Rauk.), Tallinn:: Eesti Raamat;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Võsu, Ester. ( 2010;), ‘ Metaphorical analogies in approaches of Victor Turner and Erving Goffman: Dramaturgy in social interaction and dramas of social life. ’, Sign Systems Studies, 38:1&4, pp. 130–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wagner, Geoffrey. ( 1975), The Novel and the Cinema, Rutherford, NJ:: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Theo, L. J.. ( 2022;), ‘ Catalysing Elastextity in adaptation screenwriting: The motivic chronotope of liminality. ’, Journal of Screenwriting, 13:1, pp. 97–113, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00084_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00084_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): adaptation; Bakhtin; elastextity; liminality; motivic chronotope; screenwriting; threshold chronotope

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test