How we role: The collaborative role-playing poetics of the Secret Story Network | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

In 2018, a group of ten academics and industry professionals created ‘The Secret Story Network’. This practice-research initiative produced ten 60–90-minute role-playing games conducted on the social media platform WhatsApp. In the process, we worked to identify and refine design strategies that incentivize engagement with the type of narrative collaboration that media scholars commonly call ‘collective storytelling’. Via the participatory action research methodology, this study evolved through cycles of prototyping, testing, feedback, reflection and modification. This article analyses our study in relation to the ‘Threefold Word Model’ for RPGs proposed by Kim. Based on the affordances of the WhatsApp interface, we suggest a modification of this conceptual frame, in line with scholars such as Edwards, Bøckman and Bowman that extends investigations into four theoretical lenses that we use to examine the stories in our study. These modes are (1) drama, (2) game, (3) simulation and (4) immersion. The observations made also suggest new avenues for ‘writing’ and creating interactive digital narratives.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Arts Council of England (Award ACPG-00095547 and 51391688)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00094_1
2022-07-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Argyris, C., and Schön, D.. ( 1991;), ‘ Participatory action research and action science compared. ’, in W. F. Whyte. (ed.), Participatory Action Research, London:: Sage;, pp. 8595.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.. ( 1987), Image Music Text, London:: Fontana Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateman, C.. ( 2021), Game Writing, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Bloomsbury;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, L. W.. ( 2009;), ‘ Listening to the city: Difference, identity, and storytelling in online deliberative groups. ’, Journal of Public Deliberation, 5:1, pp. 137.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boal, A.. ( 1979), Theatre of the Oppressed, London:: Pluto;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bøckman, P.. ( 2003;), ‘ The three way model revision of the threefold model. ’, in M. Gade,, L. Thorup, and M. Sander. (eds), As LARP Grows Up, Frederiksberg:: Projektgruppen KP03;, pp. 1216.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boje, D. M.. ( 1991;), ‘ Consulting and change in the storytelling organisation. ’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 4:3, pp. 717.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolter, D., and Grusin, R.. ( 2000), Remediation, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bowman, S. L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Immersion and shared imagination in role-playing games. ’, in J. P. Zagal, and S. Deterding. (eds), Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 37994.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyce, M. E.. ( 1995;), ‘ Collective centring and collective sense-making in the stories and storytelling of one organization. ’, Organizational Studies, 16:1, pp. 10737.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyd, B.. ( 2010), On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction, Cambridge, MA:: Belknap Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cahill, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ Including excluded perspectives in participatory action research. ’, Design Studies, 28, pp. 32540.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, J. N., and Mihailidis, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Exploring curation as a core competency in digital and media literacy education. ’, Faculty Works: Digital Humanities & New Media, 4, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Copeland, S., and de Moor, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Community digital storytelling for collective intelligence: Towards a storytelling cycle of trust. ’, AI & Society, 4, pp. 10111.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Documenting LARP as an art of experience. ’, International Journal of Role-Playing, 9, pp. 2430.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunbar, R.. ( 2004;), ‘ Gossip an evolutionary perspective. ’, Review of General Psychology, 8:2, pp. 10010.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Edwards, R.. ( 2001;), ‘ GNS and other matters of role-playing theory, Chapter 2. ’, The Forge, 14 October, http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/3/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerstner, D., and Staiger, J.. ( 2003), Authorship and Film, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillis, A., and Jackson, W.. ( 2002), Research Methods for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation, Philidelphia, PA:: F. A. Davis Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grant, J.,, Nelson, G., and Mitchell, T.. ( 2011;), ‘ Negotiating the challenges of participatory action research: Relationships, power, participation, change and credibility. ’, in P. Reason, and H. Bradbury. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, London:: Sage Publications Ltd;, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Grasseni, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ The atlas and the film: Collective storytelling through soundscapes, sightscapes, and virtualscapes. ’, Anthrovision, 2:2, pp. 125.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenwood, D., and Levin, M.. ( 2007), Introduction to Action Research, , 2nd ed.., Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gwynne, P.. ( 1997;), ‘ Skunk works, 1990s-style. ’, Research-Technology Management, 40:4, pp. 1823.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gyori, B.. ( 2018;), ‘ Divided Kingdom. ’, Secret Story Network, http://www.secretstorynetwork.com/divided-kingdom/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harviainen, J. T.. ( 2007;), ‘ Live-action role-playing environments as information systems: An introduction. ’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science – ‘Featuring the Future’, Tampre, Finland, 13–16 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Huffington, A. S.. ( 1988), Picasso: Creator and Destroyer, London:: Simon and Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jenkins, H.. ( 2008), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York:: New York University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, J.. ( 1997;), ‘ The rec.games.frp.advocacy FAQ: Part I: The Threefold Model. ’, Darkshire.net, https://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/theory/rgfa/faq1.html. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kimble, C.,, Grenier, C., and Goglio-Primard, K.. ( 2010;), ‘ Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. ’, International Journal of Information Management, 30:5, pp. 43744.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirsch, C.. ( 2004;), ‘ Film and collective storytelling in corporate identity: A case study. ’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9:3, pp. 22330.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Koenitz, H.. ( 2015;), ‘ Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. ’, in H. Koenitz,, G. Ferri,, M. Haahr,, D. Sezen, and T. I. Sezen. (eds), Interactive Digital Narrative, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 91105.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Laurel, B.. ( 2013), Computers as Theatre, , 2nd ed.., Indianapolis, IN:: Addison Wesley;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Likavec, S.,, Lombardi, I.,, Nantiat, A.,, Picardi, C., and Theseider, D.. ( 2010;), ‘ Threading facts into a collective narrative world. ’, in R. Aylett,, M. Y. Lim,, S. Louchart,, P. Petta, and M. Riedl. (eds), Interactive Storytelling: ICIDS 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin:: Springer;, pp. 8697.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mackenzie, J.,, Tan, P. L.,, Hoverman, S., and Baldwin, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The value and limitations of participatory action research methodology. ’, Journal of Hydrology, 474, pp. 1121.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McGonigal, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Saving the world through game design: Stories from the near future. ’, Remotedevice.net, https://remotedevice.net/blog/saving-the-world-through-game-design/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McTaggart, R.. (ed.) ( 1997), Participatory Action Research: International Contents and Consequences, New York:: State University of New York Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Neill, C.. ( 1995), Drama Worlds, New York:: Heinemann;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Patrickson, B.. ( 2016;), ‘ Playing the MOOC. ’, Storymaking symposium, Liverpool, Liverpool Screen School, 11 November, https://storymakingblog.wordpress.com/abstracts/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Prins, J.,, van Stekelenburg, J.,, Polletta, F., and Klandermans, B.. ( 2013;), ‘ Telling the collective story? Moroccan-Dutch young adults negotiation of a collective identity through storytelling. ’, Qualitative Sociology, 36:1, pp. 8199.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reason, P., and Bradbury, H.. (eds) ( 2008), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Riggs, S.. ( 2019), The End of Storytelling, New York:: Beat Media Group;.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rose, F.. ( 2015;), ‘ The power of immersive media. ’, Strategy and Business, Spring, 78, https://www.strategy-business.com/article/00308?gko=92656. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ryan, M.. ( 1991), Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory, Indianapolis, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ryan, M.-L.. ( 2012;), ‘ Peeling the onion: Layers of interactivity in digital narrative texts. ’, Marie-Laure Ryan, http://blogttn.info/dspace/rh/ba_r.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, L.,, Bratini, L.,, Chambers, D. A.,, Jensen, R. V., and Romero, L.. ( 2010;), ‘ Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. ’, Action Research, 8:4, pp. 40725.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Snow, B.. ( 2011;), ‘ Why most people don’t finish video games. ’, CNN, http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/gaming.gadgets/08/17/finishing.video-games.snow/. Accessed 17 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sousa, M. N.,, Martins, M. L., and Zagalo, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Transmedia storytelling: The roles and stakes of the different participants in the process of a convergent story in divergent media and artefacts. ’, in A. Lugmayr, and C. Dal Zotto. (eds), Media Convergence Handbook, vol. 2, Berlin:: Springer;, pp. 11735.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stenros, J.. ( 2013a;), ‘ Living the story, free to choose: Participant agency in co-created worlds. ’, Alibis for Interaction Conference, Landskrona, Sweden, 25 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stenros, J.. ( 2013b;), ‘ Aesthetics of action. ’, Jaakkostenros.wordpress.com, 28 October, https://jaakkostenros.wordpress.com/2013/10/28/aesthetics-of-action/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stenros, J., and Markus, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ The making of Nordic LARP: Documenting a tradition ephemeral co-creative play. ’, in DiGRA ‘11: Proceedings of the 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play, Hilversum, The Netherlands, 14–17 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Stringer, E.. ( 1999), Action Research, , 3rd ed.., London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Turner, V.. ( 1982), From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play, New York:: Performing Arts Journals Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Watson, T.. ( 2001;), ‘ Beyond managism: Negotiated narratives and critical management education in practice. ’, British Journal of Management, 12:4, pp. 38592.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Weiler, L.. ( 2015), Sherlock Holmes and the Internet of Things, http://lanceweiler.com/sherlock-holmes-the-internet-of-things/. Accessed 27 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wenger, E.. ( 1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Woo, Y. Y. J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Voices from the field – getting past our inner censor: Collective storytelling as pedagogy in a polarized media environment. ’, The National Association for Media Literacy Education’s Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1:2, pp. 13236.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Gyori, Brad, and Zaluczkowska, Anna. ( 2022;), ‘ How we role: The collaborative role-playing poetics of the Secret Story Network. ’, Journal of Screenwriting, 13:2, pp. 20730, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00094_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00094_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00094_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error