Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Screenwriting
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Stand-up comedy to the screen: A satirical autoethnographic approach

Abstract

Disrupting conventional screenwriting practice, several Australian stand-up comedians have used their stand-up comedy personas and material within a satirical autoethnographic approach to develop their narrative television comedy series. Stand-up comedians use autoethnographic tools of personal experience and a critique of cultural beliefs, with a satirical comedic style to develop onstage material. Their unique ‘point of view’ that may challenge societal norms, together with their cultural identity, contributes to their onstage persona. Stand-up comedy has democratized the Australian screen by giving diverse creators a platform to prove their talent and provide proof that there is an audience for their projects. This study examines how Australian stand-up comics, Josh Thomas and Kitty Flanagan, use a satirical autoethnographic approach to critique cultural beliefs, such as those relating to gender, sexuality and age, within their stand-up comedy and further develop their stage personas and material to create their respective narrative television comedy series, (2013–16) and (2021–22). The author will discuss how she similarly used satirical autoethnography to develop her Melbourne International Comedy Festival show, , subverting cultural expectations relating to mature divorced mothers. Finally, the author will discuss how aspects of her show may be developed for narrative television comedy using satirical autoethnographic approaches.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Swinburne University, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design Research Development Grant Scheme
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00155_1
2024-10-16
2024-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Tony (2006), ‘Seeking father: Relationally reframing a troubled love story’, Qualitative Inquiry, 12:4, pp. 704–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, Tony and Holman Jones, Stacy (2008), ‘Autoethnography is queer’, in N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln and L. Tuhiwai Smith (eds), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 373–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, Tony, Holman Jones, Stacy and Ellis, Carolyn (2015), Autoethnography, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ‘All You Can Eat’ (2013), Josh Thomas, Liz Doran and Thomas Ward (wrs), Mathew Saville (dir.), Please Like Me, Season 1 Episode 4 (14 March, Australia: John & Josh International and Pigeon Fancier Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. (2022), ‘Vale Fisk Series 2’, Australian Tumbleweeds, 4 November, https://blog.australiantumbleweeds.com/page/8/. Accessed 6 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Anzaldúa, Gloria (1987), Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barasch, Alex (2021), ‘Josh Thomas’s comedy of self-diagnosis’, The New Yorker, 5 April, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/12/josh-thomas-comedy-of-self-diagnosis. Accessed 28 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blair, Carole, Brown, Julie and Baxter, Leslie (1994), ‘Disciplining the feminine’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80:4, pp. 383–409.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bochner, Arthur (1994), ‘Perspectives on inquiry II: Theories and stories’, in M. Knapp and G. Miller (eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 21–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bochner, Arthur and Ellis, Carolyn (1992), ‘Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication’, Communication Theory, 2:2, pp. 165–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boylorn, Robin (2006), ‘E pluribus unum (out of many, one)’, Qualitative Inquiry, 12:4, pp. 651–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Burr, Bill (2016), ‘Bill Burr: No reason to hit a woman: How women argue (FULL) from You People Are All the Same’, YouTube, 30 January, https://youtu.be/rksKvZoUCPQ. Accessed 15 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Couser, Thomas (1997), Recovering Bodies: Illness, Disability, and Life Writing, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis, Amira (2009), ‘What we tell our daughters and ourselves about “ssshhh!!!!” hysterectomy’, Qualitative Inquiry, 15:8, pp. 1303–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Delpit, Lisa (1996), Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom, New York: W.W. Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Denzin, Norman K. (1989), Interpretive Biography, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dossa, Parin (1999), ‘(Re)imagining aging lives: Ethnographic narratives of Muslim women in diaspora’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14:3, pp. 245–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Droogsma, Rachel (2007), ‘Redefining Hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35:3, pp. 294–319.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dykins Callahan, Sara (2008), ‘Academic outings’, Symbolic Interaction, 31:4, pp. 351–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, Carolyn (2002a), ‘Being real: Moving inward toward social change’, Qualitative Studies in Education, 15:4, pp. 399–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, Carolyn (2002b), ‘Shattered lives: Making sense of September 11th and its aftermath’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31:4, pp. 375–410.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, Carolyn (2004), The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, Carolyn (2009), ‘Telling tales on neighbors: Ethics in two voices’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 2:1, pp. 3–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, Carolyn, Adams, Tony and Bochner, Arthur (2010), ‘Autoethnography: An overview’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12:1, n.pag., https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3096. Accessed 14 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fisk (2021–22, Kitty Flanagan, Penny Flanagan and Vincent Sheehan [crs], Australia: Porchlight Films and Origma Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Flanagan, Kitty (2013), ‘Hello kitty’, YouTube, 24 December, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md_TNkV0gIg&t=4s. Accessed 24 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Flanagan, Kitty (2020), ‘Why are you single? Melbourne International Comedy Festival’, ABC TV & iView, YouTube, 16 April, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XoUDK-aK9Y. Accessed 24 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Foster, Elissa (2008), ‘Commitment, communication, and contending with hetero-normativity: An invitation to greater reflexivity in interpersonal research’, Southern Communication Journal, 73:1, pp. 84–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Freud, Sigmund (1960), Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious (trans. J. Strachey), New York: The Norton Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Friedan, Betty (1964), The Feminine Mystique, New York: Dell.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Frye, Northrop (1957), Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ‘Gang Keow Wan’ (2014), Josh Thomas, Liz Doran and Thomas Ward (wrs), Mathew Saville (dir.), Please Like Me, Season 2 Episode 4 (2 September, Australia: John & Josh International, Pigeon Fancier Productions, Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Pivot).
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gerber, David (1996), ‘The “careers” of people exhibited in freak shows: The problem of volition and valorization’, in R. Thomson (ed.), Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body, New York: New York University Press, pp. 38–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Glave, Thomas (2005), Words to Our Now: Imagination and Dissent, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodall, Bud (2006), A Need to Know: The Clandestine History of a CIA Family, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hemmingson, Michael (2008), ‘Make them giggle’, Creative Approaches to Research, 1:2, pp. 9–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Highet, Gilbert (1962), The Anatomy of Satire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hodgart, Matthew (1969), Satire, London: World University Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hodges, Nathan (2021), ‘Comedic autoethnography’, in T. Adams, R. Boylorn and L. Tillmann (eds), Advances in Autoethnography and Narrative Inquiry: Reflections on the Legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner, Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 204–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Holman Jones, Stacy (2005), ‘Autoethnography: Making the personal political’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 763–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. hooks, bell (2000), Where We Stand: Class Matters, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hooton, Amanda (2016), ‘The secret life of comedian Josh Thomas’, Sydney Morning Herald, 7 December, https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/for-comedian-josh-thomas-life-and-art-are-virtually-indistinguishable-20161207-gt5v5v.html. Accessed 23 January 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ironmonger, Lauren (2022), ‘Take 5: Go’, The Age, 5 April, p. 16.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Jago, Barbara (2002), ‘Chronicling an academic depression’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31:6, pp. 729–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kagan, Dion (2014), ‘Millennial gay: Josh Thomas’ Please Like Me’, Metro Magazine, 4 August, pp. 30–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Keller, Evelyn (1995), Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kiegelmann, Mechthild (2010), ‘Ethik’, in G. Mey and K. Mruck (eds), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag and Springer, pp. 382–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kiesinger, Christine (2002), ‘My father’s shoes: The therapeutic value of narrative reframing’, in A. P. Bochner and C. Ellis (eds), Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira, pp. 95–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lawson, Richard (2015), ‘Please Like Me star Josh Thomas doesn’t think his show is the gay Girls’, Vanity Fair, 29 October, https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/10/josh-thomas-please-like-me-interview. Accessed 27 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Leder, Marilyn (2022), The MILF Next Door, Classic Southside, 5–23 April and 20–23 October; Speakeasy Vault Theatre, 9–15 October.
  51. Leder, Marilyn (2023), The MILF Next Door, Nineteen Ten, 19, 22 and 23 February; Hades Hula House, 24 and 25 February 2023.
  52. Maso, Ilja (2001), ‘Phenomenology and ethnography’, in P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland and L. Lofland (eds), Handbook of Ethnography, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 136–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Minkowitz, Donna (1995), ‘In the name of the father’, Ms., 6:3, November/December, pp. 64–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Molière (1965), ‘Preface to Tartuffe’ (ed. and trans. H. Block), in R. Corrigan (ed.), Comedy: Meaning and Form, San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ‘Pancakes and Prayer’ (2022), Kitty Flanagan, Penny Flanagan and Vincent Sheehan (wrs), Kitty Flanagan and Tom Peterson (dirs), Fisk, Season 2 Episode 3 (9 November, Australia: Porchlight Films and Origma Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Paulson, Susan and Willig, Carla (2008), ‘Older women and everyday talk about the ageing body’, Journal of Health Psychology, 13:1, pp. 106–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Pelias, Ronald (2000), ‘The critical life’, Communication Education, 49:3, pp. 220–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Pelias, Ronald (2007), ‘Jarheads, girly men, and the pleasures of violence’, Qualitative Inquiry, 13:7, pp. 945–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Please Like Me (2013–16, Josh Thomas, Thomas Ward and Liz Doran [crs], Australia: Australian Broadcasting Corporation [ABC], John & Josh International and Pigeon Fancier Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. ‘Portrait of a Lady’ (2021), Kitty Flanagan and Penny Flanagan (wrs), Kitty Flanagan and Tom Peterson (dirs), Fisk, Season 1 Episode 1 (17 March, Australia: Porchlight Films and Origma Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Poulos, Christopher (2008), Accidental Ethnography: An Inquiry into Family Secrecy, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Praise Dionysus (2022), ‘Video Footage of Their Cheersing’, Spotify, Melbourne, 6 November, https://open.spotify.com/episode/7gRRu4Pmg1PMebgBBI73OU. Accessed 22 November 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Richardson, Laurel (2000), ‘Writing: A method of inquiry’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 923–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rock, Chris (2023), ‘Chris Rock: You cannot beat a woman in an argument’, Comedic Botega, 9 September, https://www.tiktok.com/@comedicbodega/video/7284434387469454623. Accessed 15 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rosenheim, Edward (1971), ‘The satiric spectrum’, in R. Paulson (ed.), Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., pp. 305–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. ‘Rhubarb and Custard’ (2013), Josh Thomas, Liz Doran and Thomas Ward (wrs), Mathew Saville (dir.), Please Like Me, Season 1 Episode 1 (28 February, Australia: John & Josh International and Pigeon Fancier Productions).
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Spry, Tami (2001), ‘Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis’, Qualitative Inquiry, 7:6, pp. 706–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Thomas, Josh (2009), ‘Josh Thomas 2009 Melbourne International Comedy Festival Gala’, TheMelbComedyFest, YouTube, 5 August, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E25iaGdrTKM. Accessed 23 January 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Thomas, Josh (2013), ‘Josh Thomas: ABC 2 Comedy Up Late’, TheMelbComedyFest, YouTube, 11 April, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua-pNYOKnBM. Accessed 23 January 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Tofler, Marilyn (2014), ‘Gals who make the jokes: Feature film screenwriting for the satirical female voice’, in C. Batty (ed.), Screenwriters and Screenwriting: Putting Practice into Context, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 256–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Tofler, Marilyn and Batty, Craig (2017), ‘Not just for laughs: The role of the pilot in commissioning Australian television comedy series’, Comedy Studies, 8:1, pp. 81–92, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2040610X.2017.1279926. Accessed 29 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Tuohy, Wendy (2022), ‘How a “good Jewish girl” found joy in young men’, The Age/Sydney Morning Herald, 6 October, pp. 12–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Valenzuela, Angela (1999), Subtractive Schooling: U.S.-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Worcester, David (1940), The Art of Satire, New York: Russell & Russell.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Wyatt, Jonathan (2008), ‘No longer loss: Autoethnographic stammering’, Qualitative Inquiry, 14:6, pp. 955–67.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00155_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keywords: humour ; satire ; screenwriting ; performance ; autoethnography ; comedian ; television ; gender

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error