Portraying disability with trauma: A case study of documentary screenwriting in presenting visually impaired subject

References

1. Abberley, P. (1987), ‘The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability’, Disability, Handicap & Society, 2:1, pp. 5–19.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aufderheide, P. (2007), Documentary Film: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Avery, S. (2017), ‘Not without us: Collaborating across difference in documentary filmmaking’, in C. Brylla and H. Hughes (eds), Documentary and Disability, London: Springer, pp. 13–25.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barnes, C. (1992), Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People: The First in a Series of Reports, Halifax: British Council of Organizations of Disabled People.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barnes, C. (2019), ‘Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future’, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 14–31.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bernard, S. C. (2011), Documentary Storytelling: Creative Nonfiction on Screen, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blindsight (2008), Lucy Walker (wr./dir.), UK: Robson Entertainment.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bryant-Davis, T. (2019), ‘The cultural context of trauma recovery: Considering the posttraumatic stress disorder practice guideline and intersectionality’, Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 56:3, pp. 400–08.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brylla, C. (2017), ‘Spectatorship and alternative portrayals of blindness’, in C. Brylla and H. Hughes (eds), Documentary and Disability, London: Springer, pp. 61–77.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brylla, C. (2018), ‘A social cognition approach to stereotyping in documentary practice’, in C. Brylla and M. Kramer (eds), Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 263–79.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brylla, C. and Hughes, H. (2017), ‘Introduction: The bricolage of documentary and disability’, in C. Brylla and H. Hughes (eds), Documentary and Disability, London: Springer, pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caruth, C. (2016), Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Casper, M. and Wertheimer, E. (2016), Critical Trauma Studies: Understanding Violence, Conflict and Memory in Everyday Life, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chivers, S. and Markotic, N. (2010), ‘Introduction’, in S. Chivers (ed.), The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film, Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Climbing Blind (2020), Alastair Lee (wr.), Alastair Lee (dir.), UK: Posing Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Darke, P. (1998), ‘Understanding cinematic representations of disability’, in T. Shakespeare (ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, London: Cassell, pp. 181–97.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Figley, C. R., Ellis, A. E., Reuther, B. T. and Gold, S. N. (2017), ‘The study of trauma: A historical overview’, in S. N. Gold (ed.), APA Handbook of Trauma Psychology: Foundations in Knowledge, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Freud, S. (2014), On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena, Redditch: Read Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goethals, T., De Schauwer, E. and Van Hove, G. (2015), ‘Weaving intersectionality into disability studies research: Inclusion, reflexivity and anti-essentialism’, DiGeSt: Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 2:1–2, pp. 75–94.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goodley, D. (2014), Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. and Cole, K. R. (2017), ‘Critical disability studies’, in B. Gough (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 491–505.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. and Runswick-Cole, K. (2019), ‘Provocations for critical disability studies’, Disability & Society, 34:6, pp. 972–97.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Grue, J. (2016), ‘The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique’, Disability & Society, 31:6, pp. 838–49.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hadley, B. and McDonald, D. (2019), The Routledge Handbook of Disability Arts, Culture, And Media, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hamilton, N. G. (1988), Self and Others: Object Relations Theory in Practice, Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Herman, J. L. (2015), Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror, London: Hachette UK.
    [Google Scholar]
27. High Ground (2012), Michael Brown, Scott McElroy and Brian Mockenhaupt (wrs), Michael Brown (dir.), USA: Red Flag Releasing.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hwang, B., Jeong, T. and Jo, J. (2023), ‘Relationships between trauma death, disability, and geographic factors: A systematic review’, Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, 10:4, pp. 426–37.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Invisible Summit (2023), Lixin Fan (wr./dir.), China and Nepal: InHope Picture.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jane Shamrock, H., Gray, M., Cameron, M. and Oprescu, F. (2016), ‘Physical disabilities in Asia: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature written in English’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79:9, pp. 565–73.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Jiang, L. (2011), ‘Comparison of the difference between Chinese and western drinking culture’, Asian Social Science, 7:5, http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n5p251.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ke, X. and Li, S. (2024), ‘Ritual narratives of infrastructure ceremonies: Time, demands, and relations in modern Chinese history’, China Information, 38:1, pp. 68–89.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kleinman, A. and Good, B. (1985), Culture and Depression: Studies in the Anthropology and Cross-Cultural Psychiatry of Affect and Disorder, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Levant, R. F. (1997), ‘The masculinity crisis’, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 5:3, pp. 221–31.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Maccarone, E. M. (2010), ‘Ethical responsibilities to subjects and documentary filmmaking’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25:3, pp. 192–206.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Markotić, N. (2008), ‘Punching up the story: Disability and film’, Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 17:1, pp. 2–10.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (2014), Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nash, K. (2012), ‘Telling stories: The narrative study of documentary ethics’, New Review of Film and Television Studies, 10:3, pp. 318–31.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nichols, B. (2017), Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Norden, M. F. (1994), The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (2012), The New Politics of Disablement, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Partow, S., Cook, R. and McDonald, R. (2021), ‘Coping with stigmatization and discrimination related to blindness and low vision’, Rehabilitation Psychology, 66:4, pp. 576–88.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Reeve, D. (2015), ‘Psycho-emotional disablism in the lives of people experiencing mental distress’, Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, Cambridge: Policy Press, pp. 99–112.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Shakespeare, T. (2013), Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Stienstra, D. (2013), ‘Race/ethnicity and disability studies: Towards an explicitly intersectional approach’, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 384–97.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Thompson, J. E. (2015), Exploitative to Favorable, Freak to Ordinary: The Evolution of Disability Representation in Film, Columbus, OH: Ohio Dominican University.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Traverso, A. and Broderick, M. (2010), ‘Interrogating trauma: Towards a critical trauma studies’, Continuum, 24:1, pp. 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Watson, N. and Vehmas, S. (2019), ‘Disability studies: Into the multidisciplinary future’, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wolfe, K. (1996), ‘Ordinary people: Why the disabled aren’t so different’, The Humanist, 56:6, p. 31–33.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Xiong, Y. and Liu, X. (2023), ‘Visually impaired women on the move: The intersection of gender and disability in China’, Disability & Society, 38:8, pp. 1327–46.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Young, S. (2012), ‘We’re not here for your inspiration’, ABC’s Ramp Up, 3 July, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-03/young-inspiration-porn/4107006. Accessed 15 July 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Young, S. (2014), ‘I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much’, TED Talk, April, https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much?subtitle=en. Accessed 15 July 2024.
    [Google Scholar]