Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Screenwriting
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Comedy screenwriting and mental health

Abstract

This article examines how comedy screenwriting offers a distinctive, though under-analysed, lens for representing mental health with nuance, empathy and authenticity. While dominant screen genres, particularly drama, often frame mental illness as an individual obstacle to be overcome, comedy’s tonal flexibility, structural playfulness and character-driven humour create opportunities to challenge stigma, normalize psychological complexity and foster audience identification. Drawing on humour theory, screenwriting research and mental health scholarship, this article explores how specific comedic strategies – including narrative fragmentation, unreliable narration, meta-commentary and the integration of humour as a coping mechanism – expand the possibilities for portraying psychological struggle in long-form television. Through close analysis of five contemporary series – , , , and it demonstrates how comedy can destabilize reductive portrayals, resist simplistic recovery narratives and promote more compassionate, socially embedded engagement with mental health. Particular attention is given to how screenwriting structures shape audience alignment and how intersectional, culturally specific narratives challenge exclusionary models of well-being. The article also addresses the ethical complexities of humorous mental health representation, arguing that comedy’s potential to reduce stigma depends not on its presence alone, but on deliberate creative choices grounded in psychological nuance and ethical care.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00182_1
2025-09-08
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archer (2009–present, Adam Reed [cr.], USA: FX).
  2. Aspler, J., Zúñiga, J. and McMillan, B. (2022), ‘Mental health and stigma in entertainment media: A scoping review of recent research’, Journal of Health Communication, 27:4, pp. 325–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2043659.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Beth-Forst, C. (2017), ‘Intersectionality, mental health, and media: Exploring the representation of marginalized communities’, Health Communication Research, 42:3, pp. 289–310, https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316660364.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BoJack Horseman (2014–20, Raphael Bob-Waksberg and Lisa Purdy [crs], USA: Netflix).
  5. Brady, T. (2022), ‘Masculinity and mental health: Popular media and the gendered politics of emotional vulnerability’, Men and Masculinities, 25:1, pp. 23–45, https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211066050.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Caplan, R. (2021), ‘Exceptionalism and recovery: Narrative structures of mental health in popular media’, Journal of Popular Culture, 54:2, pp. 401–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.13035.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Conrad, P. (2001), The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (2015–19, Rachel Bloom and Aline Brosh McKenna [crs], USA: The CW).
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. DuPont-Reyes, M. J., Villatoro, A. P., Peña, M. and Tang, L. (2024), ‘Persistent invisibility and stereotyping as forms of mental illness stigma: A Spanish and English cross-language content analysis of mental illness portrayals on YouTube television’, Stigma and Health, advance online publication, https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/sah0000551.
  11. Fleabag (2016–19, Phoebe Waller-Bridge [cr.], UK and USA: BBC and Amazon Prime Video).
  12. Foss, K. A. (2009), ‘Constructing the “cancer patient”: Cancer, identity, and subjectivity in mass media’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26:3, pp. 238–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903015063.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Frantz, S. (2023), ‘Screenwriting empathy: Audience alignment and character perspective in mental health narratives’, Screenwriting Studies, 6:1, pp. 12–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2023.2004897.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gattoni, L. (2023), ‘“Overcoming” mental illness: Critical approaches to recovery arcs in contemporary television’, Media, Culture & Society, 45:2, pp. 223–41, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221123456.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray, J. (2020), Television Entertainment: Narrative, Audience, and Context, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hilkek, A. (2020), ‘Laughing through the pain? Comedy, coping, and the politics of mental health representation’, Media Psychology, 23:4, pp. 530–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1728730.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Insecure (2016–21, Issa Rae and Larry Wilmore [crs], USA: HBO).
  18. Krivacic, M. (2023), ‘Exceptional illness: How popular media frames mental health through disruption and resolution’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 16:1, pp. 17–35, https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz043.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kroener, D. (2018), ‘Writing for identification: Screenwriting, mental health, and the construction of audience empathy’, Journal of Screenwriting, 9:1, pp. 53–70, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.9.1.53_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Libera, T. (2020), ‘Is satire serious? The limits of humorous critique in television comedy’, Comedy Studies, 11:2, pp. 156–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/2040610X.2020.1761457.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ‘Make Rebecca Great Again’ (2020), D, Lowney (dir.), Ted Lasso, Season 1 Episode 7 (2 October, USA: Apple TV+).
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, R. A. (2007), The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach, Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. McGraw, P. and Warren, C. (2010), ‘Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny’, Psychological Science, 21:8, pp. 1141–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, I. H. (2003), ‘Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence’, Psychological Bulletin, 129:5, pp. 674–97, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, R. and Quick, B. (2010), ‘Benefits and risks of humor in health messages: A content analysis of humorous health advertisements in print media’, Health Communication, 25:5, pp. 397–406, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.483102.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mittell, J. (2015), Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Osborne, M. (2023), ‘Fourth-wall breaks and the fragmented self: Comedy, audience address, and mental health’, Screen, 64:2, pp. 185–203, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjad004.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Pose (2018–21, Steven Canals, Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk [crs], USA: FX).
  29. Salloum, S. (2023), ‘Glamour, dysfunction, and media spectacle: Celebrity mental health in the age of social media’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 16:2, pp. 212–31, https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz050.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith-Frigerio, S. (2018), ‘Intersectional invisibilities: Mental health, race, and gender in popular media’, Feminist Media Studies, 18:4, pp. 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1355798.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. South Park (1997–present, Trey Parker and Matt Stone [crs], USA: Comedy Central).
  32. Ted Lasso (2020–present, Jason Sudeikis, Bill Lawrence and Brendan Hunt [crs], USA: Apple TV+).
  33. Tharib, S. (2013), ‘Humour, mental illness, and the ethics of representation in popular culture’, The European Journal of Humour Research, 1:2, pp. 67–82, https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.2.tharib.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Warren, C., McGraw, P. and Van Boven, L. (2018), ‘The boundary conditions of humor’s positive effects on well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114:6, pp. 1082–96, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000156.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Yue, A. and Hiranandani, M. (2014), ‘Comedy, identity, and the politics of difference: Towards inclusive screen narratives’, Journal of Popular Television, 2:2, pp. 151–68, https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv.2.2.151_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zillmann, D. and Cantor, J. (1976), ‘A disposition theory of humor and mirth’, in A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (eds), Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 93–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rieger, D. and Hofer, M. (2017), ‘How movies can change our minds: Exploring the mechanisms of narrative persuasion’, Media Psychology, 20:4, pp. 610–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1311268.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00182_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keywords: narrative structure ; destigmatization ; episodic storytelling ; media psychology ; audience alignment ; humour theory

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test