One viable protagonist, one viable choice: Resisting contradictory character change while writing an interactive film

References

1. Aarseth, Espen J. (1997), Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature, Baltimore, MD and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aristotle (1965), ‘On the art of poetry’, in B. Radice and R. Baldick (eds), Aristotle Horace Longinus: Classical Literary Criticism (trans. T. S. Dorsch), London: Penguin Classic, pp. 30–75.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aronson, Linda (2010), The 21st Century Screenplay: A Comprehensive Guide to Writing Tomorrow’s Films, Crow’s Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Batty, Craig (2013), ‘Unpacking critical theories to enhance creative practice: A PhD in screenwriting case study’, Media Education Research Journal, 4:1, pp. 12–26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bell, Alice (2011), ‘Ontological boundaries and methodological leaps: The importance of possible worlds theory for hypertext fiction (and beyond)’, in R. Page and T. Bronwen (eds), New Narratives: Stories and Storytelling in the Digital Age, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 63–82.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Besant, Walter and James, Henry (1884), Art of Fiction, Boston, MA: Cupples and Hurd and The Algonquin Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (2018), Charlie Brooker (wr.), David Slade (dir.), USA: Netflix.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bode, Christoph and Dietrich, Rainer (2013), Future Narratives: Theory, Poetics, and Media-Historical Moment, Berlin: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Calhoun, Cheshire (2008), ‘Losing one’s self’, in K. Atkins and C. Mackenzie (eds), Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, New York: Routledge, pp. 193–211.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Catron, Louis E. (1993), The Elements of Playwriting, New York: Macmillan General Reference.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clovek a jeho dum (Kinoautomat: One Man and His House) (1967), Pavel Juráček, Radúz Činčera, Miroslav Horníček, Ján Roháč and Vladimír Svitáček (wrs), Radúx Cincera, Ján Rohác and Vladimír Svitácek (dirs), Czechoslovakia: Bozar Cinema.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gibson, Ross (2010), ‘The known world’, TEXT, 14:Special 8, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.31508.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Griffiths, Morwenna (2011), ‘Research and the self’, in M. Biggs and H. Karlsson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 167–86.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hales, Chris (2014), ‘Spatial and narrative constructions for interactive cinema, with particular reference to the work of Raduz Cincera’, in C. Hales and R. Kelomees (eds), Expanding Practices in Audiovisual Narrative, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing, pp. 143–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hales, Chris (2015), ‘Interactive cinema in the digital age’, in H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen and T. İ. Sezen (eds), Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 36–50.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hambly, Glenda (2021), ‘The not so universal hero’s journey’, Journal of Screenwriting, 12:2, pp. 135–50, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00056_1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hannula, Mika, Suoranta, Juha and Vadén, Tere (2004), Artistic Research Methodology: Narrative, Power and the Public, Lausanne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haseman, Brad (2007), ‘Rupture and recognition: Identifying the performative research paradigm’, in E. Barrett and B. Bolt (eds), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, London: I.B. Tauris & Co, pp. 147–57.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jorgensen, Soni (2017), ‘Character, plot and the human condition’, Journal of Screenwriting, 8:2, pp. 117–26, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.8.2.117_3.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kallas, Christina (2010), Creative Screenwriting: Understanding Emotional Structure (trans. J. W. Howard), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kallay, Jasmina (2010) ‘Cyber-Aristotle: Towards a poetics for interactive screenwriting’, Journal of Screenwriting, 1:1, pp. 99–112, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.1.1.99/1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Keerdo-Dawson, Michael (2020), Läheduse raamid (The Limits of Consent), unpublished screenplay.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kennett, Jeanette and Matthews, Steve (2008), ‘Normative agency’, in K. Atkins and C. Mackenzie (eds), Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, New York: Routledge, pp. 212–31.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kubota, Tyson (2016), ‘Choose wisely: Interactive narrative films express the possibilities and limitations of cinema itself’, Film Comment, 52:6, pp. 20–21.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lacombe, Pierre, Féraud, Gabriel and Bivière, Clément (2020), Writing an Interactive Story, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Läheduse raamid (The Limits of Consent) (2022), Michael Keerdo-Dawson (wr./dir.), Estonia: BFM Productions and the Cultural Endowment of Estonia.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Landow, George P. (2006), Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mäki, Teemu (2013), ‘Art and research colliding’, Journal for Artistic Research, 5.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Maras, Steven (2017), ‘Towards a critique of universalism in screenwriting criticism’, Journal of Screenwriting, 8:2, pp. 177–96, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.8.2.177_1.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marks, Dara (2009), Inside Story: The Power of the Transformational Arc, London: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McKee, Robert (1997), Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting, London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Memento (2000), Christopher Nolan and Jonathan Nolan (wrs), Christopher Nolan (dir.), USA: Summit Entertainment.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mulholland Drive (2001), David Lynch (wr./dir.), USA: Universal Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Przypadek (Blind Chance) (1989), Krzysztof Kieslowski (wr./dir.), Poland: Zespol Filmowy ‘Tor’.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2003), Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Smith, Murray (1995), Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Storr, Will (2019), The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better, London: William Colins.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Yorke, John (2013), Into the Woods: How Stories Work and Why We Tell Them, London: Penguin Random House UK.
    [Google Scholar]