Skip to content
1981
Screenwriting and AI: Emerging Theories, Modes and Practices
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

The use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the way we tell stories – from the way we develop ideas to writing and production processes. This article presents a case study that followed the screenwriting processes, supported by generative AI, used in the making of , a short science fiction film, produced by multi-award-winning Bristol-based visual effects (VFX) studio Lux Aeterna. was developed as an industry case study as part of the UKRI-funded MyWorld programme, which explores the future of creative technology innovation in the south-west of the United Kingdom by pioneering new ideas, products and processes. This article shares findings from this case study, achieved through tracking the development of the screenwriting processes developed in the production of , which included a series of interviews with those involved in the process. The findings highlight a nuanced relationship with generative AI, which, while initially embraced as a creative driver, the team ultimately found more valuable in specific creation and production contexts. This case study offers valuable insights for screenwriters, emphasizing the importance of both maintaining human creative control while also experimenting with emerging technologies through a reflective process. The article argues that defining generative AI’s specific role in the screenwriting process, whether in the role of research assistant, character development tool, co-writer/writing partner or editor/critical friend, becomes a crucial part of the creative process.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • UKRI MyWorld (Award 107137)
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00190_1
2026-01-31
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amaro, Ramon (2022), The Black Technical Object: On Machine Learning and the Aspiration of a Black Being, London: Steinberg Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anguiano, Dani and Beckett, Lois (2023), ‘How Hollywood writers triumphed over AI – and why it matters’, The Guardian, 1 October, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/oct/01/hollywood-writers-strike-artificial-intelligence. Accessed 5 August 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender, Emily M., Gebru, Timnit, McMillan-Major, Angelina and Shmitchell, Shmargaret (2021), ‘On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?’, FAccT ‘21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, New York, NY, USA, 1 March, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 610–23, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922. Accessed 30 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin, Ruha (2019), Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Viktoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavazza, Marc, Charles, Fred and Mead, Steven J. (2001), ‘Characters in search of an author: AI-based virtual storytelling’, in O. Balet, G. Subsol and P. Torguet (eds), Virtual Storytelling Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling: ICVS 2001 – Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2197, Berlin: Springer, pp. 145–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45420-9_16.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cave, Stephen and Dihal, Kanta (2019), ‘Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality’, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1:2, pp. 74–78, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0020-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Jing, Zhu, Xinyu, Yang, Cheng, Shi, Chufan, Xi, Yadong, Zhang, Yuxiang, Wang, Junjie, Pu, Jiashu, Feng, Tian, Yang, Yujiu and Zhang, Rongsheng (2024), ‘HoLLMwood: Unleashing the creativity of large language models in screenwriting via role playing’, in Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal and Y.-N. Chen (eds), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, Miami, FL: Association for Computer Linguistics, pp. 8075–121, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.474.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chow, Pei-Sze (2020), ‘Ghost in the (Hollywood) machine: Emergent applications of artificial intelligence in the film industry’, NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 9:1, pp. 193–214, http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14307.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Linda (2022), ‘Towards “creativity amplification”: Or, AI for writers, or beating the system’, Writing in Practice, 7:7, pp. 137–49, https://doi.org/10.62959/wip-07-2023-11.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Conor, Bridget (2014), Screenwriting: Creative Labor and Professional Practice, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203080771.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dayo, Fatima, Memon, Ahmed A. and Dharejo, Nasrullah (2023), ‘Scriptwriting in the age of AI: Revolutionizing storytelling with artificial intelligence’, Journal of Media and Communication, 4:1, pp. 24–38, http://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.jmc.2023.04.01.02.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dhillon, Paramveer S., Molaei, Somayeh, Li, Jiaqi, Golub, Maximilian, Zheng, Shaochun, Robert, Lionel P. (2024), ‘Shaping human-AI collaboration: Varied scaffolding levels in co-writing with language models’, in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24), Honolulu, HI, USA, 11–16 May, New York: ACM, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.364213.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dinello, Daniel (2005), Technophobia! Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Erpelding, Craig, Beck, Jack, Swerzenski, James D. and Brecheisen, Thomas (2024), ‘Forum on Artificial Intelligence’, JFV: Journal of Film and Video, 76:1, pp. 44–55, https://doi.org/10.5406/19346018.76.1.05.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Halperin, Brett A. and Rosner, Daniela K. (2025), ‘“AI is soulless”: Hollywood film workers strike and emerging perceptions of generative cinema’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 32:2, pp. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1145/3716135.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hermann, Isabella (2021), ‘Artificial intelligence in fiction: Between narratives and metaphors’, AI & Society, 38, pp. 319–29, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kawakami, Reishiro and Venkatagiri, Sukrit (2024), ‘The impact of generative AI on artists’, in C&C '24: Creativity and Cognition, Chicago, IL, USA, 23–26 June, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 79–82, https://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3664263.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, You Jin, Cheong, Yun Gyung and Lee, Jung Hoon (2019), ‘Prediction of a movie’s success from plot summaries using deep learning models’, in Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Storytelling, August, Florence, Italy, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 127–35, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3414.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lo, Leo S. (2023), ‘The art and science of prompt engineering: A new literacy in the information age’, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 27:4, pp. 203–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2227621.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Luchen, Fang and Zhongwei, Li (2023), ‘ChatGPT begins: A reflection on the involvement of AI in the creation of film and television scripts’, Frontiers in Art Research, 5, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2023.051701.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirowski, Piotr, Mathewson, Kori W., Pittman, Jaylen and Evans, Richard (2023), ‘Co-writing screenplays and theatre scripts with language models: Evaluation by industry professionals’, in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.14958.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. The Royal Society (2018), Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter, https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/ai-narratives/. Accessed 29 October 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Sergi, Michael (2024), ‘Entangled with AI: Questioning authorship and the potential impact on the creative and authentic voice’, in ASPERA Conference 2024: Filmmaking Intelligences – the Future of Authentic, Creative and Artificial Approaches in Teaching and Research, Melbourne, Australia, 26–28 November, p. 62.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Tang, Yuying, Li, Haotian, Lan, Minghe, Ma, Xiaojuan and Qu, Huamin (2025), ‘Understanding screenwriters’ practices, attitudes, and future expectations in human-AI co-creation’, in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘25), Yokohama, Japan, 26 April–1 May, ACM, https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714120.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Telotte, Jay P. (2001), Replications: A Robotic History of the Science Fiction Film, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Thorne, Sarah (2020), ‘Hey Siri, tell me a story: Digital storytelling and AI authorship’, Convergence: International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26:4, pp. 808–23, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520913866.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Vainikka, Elisa, Soronen, Anne and Kallio, Saara M. (2024), ‘Is prompt engineering the future of screenwriting? Views of professional screenwriters and commissioners about the impact of AI technologies on their profession’, Critical Studies in Television, 20:1, pp. 54–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020241269277.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00190_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artificial intelligence; authorship; character development; generative AI; RENO; storytelling; studio Lux Aeterna

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test