Skip to content
1981
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

Television screenwriting theory traditionally discourages dialogue-heavy character exposition, yet contemporary serial narratives increasingly demand psychologically complex characters. This study applies Michael D. Bristol’s from literary criticism to television dialogue practices, demonstrating how writers can use strategic verbal cues to create authentic character motivations. Using the method, this research reimagines Shakespeare’s Juliet Capulet for a speculative television adaptation, showing how canonical character traits can appear transformed through trauma while remaining psychologically consistent. The methodology reveals how audiences naturally interpret scattered to construct coherent character portraits, an interpretive process that current screenwriting theory has not systematized. The study finds that Bristol’s two-step framework (identifying structural absences and applying background knowledge) provides television writers with practical tools for dialogue-driven character development. Rather than avoiding exposition, writers can transform it into opportunities for collaborative interpretation that engage audiences’ psychological understanding. This research contributes to screenwriting theory by introducing philosophical concepts of character from literary studies, particularly the idea of treating fictional characters as psychologically real people. This perspective validates character-based interpretation and challenges formalist approaches that reduce characters to structural elements, demonstrating how literary theory’s understanding of character psychology can enhance television writing practices.

© 2026 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00194_1
2026-03-31
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, H. (2018), ‘“Real people’s lives rarely fall into a three-act structure”: Writing biographical drama for British television’, Journal of Screenwriting, 9:1, pp. 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.9.1.41_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Batty, C. (2011), Movies That Move Us: Screenwriting and the Power of the Protagonist’s Journey, Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarek, M. (2015), ‘An overview of the linguistics of screenwriting and its interdisciplinary connections, with special focus on dialogue in episodic television’, Journal of Screenwriting, 6:2, pp. 221–38, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.6.2.221_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloom, H. (1995), I. Shakespeare and the Value of Personality; II. Shakespeare and the Value of Love, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bristol, M. D. (2003), ‘How many children did she have?’, in J. Joughin (ed.), Philosophical Shakespeares, Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis, pp. 19–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bristol, M. D. (2009), ‘Confusing Shakespeare’s characters with real people: Reflections on reading in four questions’, in P. E. Yachnin and J. Slights (eds), Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Callaghan, D. (2006), ‘Do characters have souls?’, in S. Zimmerman and G. A. Sullivan (eds), Shakespeare Studies, vol. 34, Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 41–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpi, D. (2015), ‘Romeo and Juliet: The importance of a name’, Pólemos, 9:1, pp. 37–50, https://doi.org/10.1515/pol-2015-0004.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cattrysse, P. (2010), ‘The protagonist’s dramatic goals, wants and needs’, Journal of Screenwriting, 1:1, pp. 83–97, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.1.1.83/1.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Coodin, S. (2010), ‘What’s virtue ethics got to do with it? Shakespearean character as moral character’, in M. D. Bristol (ed.), Shakespeare and Moral Agency, London: Continuum, pp. 184–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Corbett, D. (2013), The Art of Character: Creating Memorable Characters for Fiction, Film, and TV, East Rutherford, NJ: Penguin Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Crewe, J. (2006), ‘Reclaiming character?’, in S. Zimmerman and G. A. Sullivan (eds), Shakespeare Studies, vol. 34, Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 35–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Desmet, C. (2006), ‘The persistence of character’, in S. Zimmerman and G. A. Sullivan (eds), Shakespeare Studies, vol. 34, Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 46–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Durand, V. N., Loe, Irene M., Yeatman, Jason D. and Feldman, Heidi M. (2013), ‘Effects of early language, speech, and cognition on later reading: A mediation analysis’, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00586.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyer, R. (1998), Stars (ed. P. McDonald), London: BFI Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Egri, L. (1995), The Art of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis in the Creative Interpretation of Human Movies, New York: Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Grady, H. (2003), ‘On the need for a differentiated theory of (early) modern subjects’, in J. Joughin (ed.), Philosophical Shakespeares, Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis, pp. 35–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Greens, R. (2017), ‘Character over concept: Writing dialogue in search of story’, Journal of Screenwriting, 8:1, pp. 39–54, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.8.1.39_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Howard, D. and Mabley, E. (1993), The Tools of Screenwriting: A Writer’s Guide to the Craft and Elements of a Screenplay, New York: St. Martin’s.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter, L. (1994), Lew Hunter’s Screenwriting 434, New York: Perigee Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ianniello, M. (2023), ‘Character composition: A new framework for TV serial drama characters’, Journal of Screenwriting, 14:2, pp. 159–72, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00121_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jorgensen, S. (2017), ‘Character, plot and the human condition’, Journal of Screenwriting, 8:2, pp. 117–26, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.8.2.117_3.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Knights, L. C. (1946), ‘How many children had Lady Macbeth?’, in Explorations: Essays in Criticism, Mainly on the literature of the Seventeenth Century, London: Chatto & Windus, pp. 1–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kozloff, S. (ed.) (2000), Overhearing Film Dialogue, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis, D. (1978), ‘Truth in fiction’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 15:1, pp. 37–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lumet, S. (1996), Making Movies, New York: Vintage Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mamet, D. (2011), True and False: Heresy and Common Sense for the Actor, Westminster: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McKee, R. (1997), Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting, New York: Regan Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Moghaddam, F. M. (2018), Mutual Radicalization: How Groups and Nations Drive Each Other to Extremes, Worcester, MA: American Psychological Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nussbaum, M. (1993), ‘Non‐relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds), The Quality of Life, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Meara, R. (2015), ‘Changing the way we think about character change in episodic television series’, Journal of Screenwriting, 6:2, pp. 189–201, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.6.2.189_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pelican, K.-A. (2021), The Science of Writing Characters: Using Psychology to Create Compelling Fictional Characters, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pelican, K.-A., Ward, R. and Sherry, J. (2016), ‘The Pleistocene protagonist: An evolutionary framework for the analysis of film protagonists’, Journal of Screenwriting, 7:3, pp. 331–49, https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.7.3.331_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Price, S. (2011), ‘Character in the screenplay text’, in J. Nelmes (ed.), Analysing the Screenplay, New York: Routledge, pp. 201–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Richardson, K. (2010), Television Dramatic Dialogue, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Scannell, P. (ed.) (1991), Broadcast Talk, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Seger, L. (1994), Making a Good Script Great: A Guide for Writing and Rewriting, 2nd ed., Hollywood, FL: Samuel French Trade.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Vale, E. (1986), The Technique of Screen and Television Writing, New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Vermeule, B. (2010), Why Do We Care about Literary Characters?, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Walton, K. L. (1991), ‘Precis of Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51:2, pp. 379–82, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108134.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, X. and Xing, Y. (2024), ‘The one and only Juliet: The humanity of young noblewomen in Shakespeare’s play’, Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 10:1, https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.10.1.51.2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Bristol, M. D. (2012), ‘Introduction’, in S. Zimmerman and G. Sullivan (eds), Shakespeare Studies, vol. XL, Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 19–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Bristol, M. D. (2016), ‘How dark was it in that room? Performing a scene Shakespeare never wrote’, in Y. J. Ko and M. W. Shurgot (eds), Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and from the Stage, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 19–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Bristol, M. D., Desmet, Christy and States, Bert O. (1994), ‘Book reviews: Reading Shakespeare’s Characters: Rhetoric, Ethics, and Identity by Christy Desmet/Hamlet and the Concept of Character by Bert O. States’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 45:2, pp. 226–31, https://doi.org/10.2307/2871219.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Crothers, R. (1928), ‘The construction of a play’, in J. Lynch Williams (ed.), The Art of Playwriting: Lectures Delivered at the University of Pennsylvania on the Mask and Wig Foundation, Freeport, TX and New York: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 121–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ko, Y. J. (2012), ‘Introduction’, in M. S. Shurgot (ed.), Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and from the Stage, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Norton, D. L. and Philosophy Documentation Center (1988), ‘Moral minimalism and the development of moral character’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13:3, pp. 180–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1988.tb00121.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Shakespeare, W. (1997), Macbeth (ed. K. Muir), London: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Shakespeare, W. and Bloom, H. (2008), Romeo and Juliet (ed. B. Raffel), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00194_1
Loading
The false villain method: Applying the vernacular approach to television character development
Journal of Screenwriting 17, 97 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00194_1
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00194_1
/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00194_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): character motivation; exposition; psychological realism; television dialogue; verbal cues; vernacular interpretation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test