Skip to content
1981
Music Technology and Popular Music Education
  • ISSN: 2397-6721
  • E-ISSN: 2397-673X

Abstract

Since the 1960s, electronic sound synthesis and the keyboard interface have been so closely associated that many young musicians have come to see them as inseparable components, if not interchangeable terms. In this article, we ‘disconnect the keyboard’ and explore an alternative history of electronic sound synthesis – modular synthesis – that has remained largely overshadowed by keyboard-based synthesizers since the Minimoog. Researchers in music education signal that Eurocentric aesthetic norms, ableist performance ideals and exclusionary practices are interwoven in keyboard technologies, creating barriers that extend into popular music education. Drawing upon critical discussions in music education and science and technology studies (STS), we examine the underexplored opportunities of using modular synthesizers for music learning. We examine how modular synthesis, liberated from the keyboard-controller, serves as a basis for exploring an alternative model for sound-based inquiry and for rethinking the possibilities of instrument design and ways of musiking that are more inclusive.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada (Award 430-2019-00658)
  • York University’s Catalyzing Interdisciplinary Research Clusters (CIRC)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jpme_00128_1
2024-03-26
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. bell, adam patrick (2017), ‘(Dis)Ability and music education: Paralympian Patrick Anderson and the experience of disability in music’, Action, Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 16:3, pp. 10828.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. bell, adam patrick, Bonin, David, Pethrick, Helen, Antwi-Nsiah, Amanda and Matterson, Brent (2020), ‘Hacking, disability and music education’, International Journal of Music Education, 38:4, pp. 65772.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. bell, adam patrick, Dasent, Jason and Tshuma, Gift (2022), ‘Disabled and racialized musicians: Experiences and epistemologies’, Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 21:2, pp. 1756.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellucci, Andreas, Nolan, Jason and DiSanto, Aurelia (2018), ‘Research in the wild(s): Opportunities, affordances and constraints doing assistive technology field research in underserved areas’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 38:4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benedict, Cathay and Schmidt, Patrick (2011), ‘Politics of not knowing: The disappearing act of an education in music’, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27:3, pp. 13448.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Benedict, Cathy, Schmidt, Patrick, Spruce, Gary and Woodford, Paul (2015), ‘Why social justice and music education?’, in C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce and P. Woodford (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Justice in Music Education, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xixvi.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernstein, David (2008), ‘The San Francisco Tape Music Center: Emerging art forms and the American counterculture’, in D. Bernstein (ed.), The San Francisco Tape Music Center: 1960s Counterculture and the Avant-Garde, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 541.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolden, Ben (2010), ‘Talent’, Canadian Music Educator, 51:4, pp. 46.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, Hans-Joachim (2002), ‘Introduction: Technology and the production and reproduction of music in the 20th century’, in H.-J. Baun (ed.), Music and Technology in the Twentieth Century, Baltimore, MD and London: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 932.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Byrne, David (2012), How Music Works, San Francisco, CA: McSweeney’s.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, Skylar and Williams, Annika (2023), ‘Dreaming a rubatic world: An embodied resistance to chrononormativity in music’, The 3rd Biennial International Disability Studies and Music Education Symposium (DSandME23), James Madison University, Harrisonburg, 29 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlos, Wendy (1968), Switched-On Bach, CD, USA: Columbia Records.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clarke, Adele E., Washburn, Rachel and Friese, Carrie (2022), ‘Introducing situational analysis’, in C. E. Clarke, R. Washburn and C. Friese (eds), Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Relationalities across Disciplines, 2nd ed., New York and London: Routledge, pp. 536.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox, Christopher (2017), ‘Sonic thought’, in B. Herzogenrath (ed.), Sonic Thinking: A Media Philosophical Approach, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 99109.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cumming, Naomi (2000), The Sonic Self: Musical Subjectivity and Signification, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Diduck, Ryan (2018), Mad Skills: MIDI and Music Technology in the Twentieth Century, London: Repeater.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Drake Music Official Website (2023), ‘Home page’, drakemusic.org, https://www.drakemusic.org. Accessed 1 May 2023.
  18. Frid, Emma (2019), ‘Accessible digital musical instruments: A review of musical interfaces in inclusive music practice’, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3:3, pp. 5720.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaztambide-Fernández, Rubén A., Saifer, Adam and Desai, Chandni (2013), ‘“Talent” and the misrecognition of social advantage in specialized arts education’, Roeper Review, 35:2, pp. 12435.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Green, Lucy (2008), Music, Informal Learning and the School: A New Classroom Pedagogy, New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hindley, Geoffrey (2002), ‘Keyboards, crankshafts and communication: The musical mindset of western technology’, in H.-J. Baun (ed.), Music and Technology in the Twentieth Century, Baltimore, MD and London: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 3342.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Honisch, Stefan Sunandan (2009), ‘“Re-narrating disability” through musical performance’, Music Theory Online, 15:3, pp. 34, https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.09.15.3/mto.09.15.3.honisch.html. Accessed 28 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Honisch, Stefan Sunandan (2018), ‘Virtuosities of deafness and blindness: Musical performance and the prized body’, in Y. Kim and S. L. Gilman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Music and the Body, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 27694.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingold, Tim (2010), ‘Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials’, NCRM Working Paper Series: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, working paper, Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/1/0510_creative_entanglements.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Larsen, Jeppe Veirum, Overholt, Dan and Moeslund, Thomas B. (2016), ‘The prospects of musical instruments for people with physical disabilities’, NIME ’16 Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Griffith University, Brisbane, pp. 32731, NIME, https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2016/nime2016_paper0064.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Laudadio, Nicholas C. (2011), ‘“Sounds like a human performance”: The electronic music synthesizer in mid-twentieth-century science fiction’, Science Fiction Studies, 38:2, pp. 30420.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lavengood, Megan (2019), ‘What makes it sound ’80s?: The Yamaha DX7 electric piano sound’, Journal of Popular Music Studies, 31:3, pp. 7394.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lubet, Alex (2009), ‘The inclusion of music/the music of inclusion’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13:7, pp. 72739.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lubet, Alex (2011), Music, Disability, and Society, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Manovich, Lev (2001), The Language of New Media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Manovich, Lev (2007), ‘What comes after remix?’, Manovich.net, http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/what-comes-after-remix. Accessed 28 April 2021.
  32. Matthews, Charles (2018), ‘The social model of disability from a music technology (and ADHD) perspective’, ardisson.net, 11 April, http://ardisson.net/a/?p=363. Accessed 15 February 2021.
  33. McBride, Melanie (2018), ‘Tangible inquiries: A study of aroma materials and sources in the built and botanical environments of Grasse, France’, Ph.D. thesis, Toronto: York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McKay, George (2013), Shakin’ All Over: Popular Music and Disability, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McLuhan, Marshall (1964), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nolan, Jason (2020), ‘(Self)Interview with an autistic: Intrinsic interest and learning with and about music and the missing modality of sound’, Canadian Music Educators, 62:1, pp. 714.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nolan, Jason and McBride, Melanie (2014), ‘Beyond gamification: Reconceptualizing game-based learning in early childhood environments’, Information, Communication & Society, 17:5, pp. 594608.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Oram, Daphne (2016), An Individual Note of Music: Sound and Electronics, London: Anomie.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinch, Trevor and Bijsterveld, Karin (2004), ‘Sound studies: New technologies and music’, Social Studies of Science, 34:5, pp. 63548.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pinch, Trevor and Trocco, Frank (1998), ‘The social construction of the early electronic music synthesizer’, International Committee for the History of Technology (ICOHTEC), 4, pp. 931.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pinch, Trevor and Trocco, Frank (2004), Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Powell, Bryan (2021), ‘Modern band: A review of literature’, Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 39:3, pp. 3946, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123320988528.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rancière, Jacques (2004), The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rathgeber, Jesse (2017), ‘A place in the band negotiating barriers to inclusion in a rock band setting’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 36981.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rathgeber, Jesse and Bernard, Cora Faith (2021), ‘“When I Say ‘Modern’, You Say ‘Band’”: A critical narrative of modern band and little kids rock as music education curriculum’, Journal of Popular Music Education, 5:3, pp. 33758.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Said, Edward (1991), ‘Performance as an extreme occasion’, in Musical Elaborations, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 134.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sandlin, Jennifer A., Schultz, Brian and Burdick, Jake (2010), Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning beyond Schooling, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Scherzinger, Martin (2016), ‘Software physiognomics: Adorno’s radio analytics today’, New German Critique, 43:3, pp. 5372.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmidt, Patrick (2020), ‘Doing away with music: Reimagining a new order of music education practice’, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 35:3, pp. 4453.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Small, Christopher (1998), Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith, Gareth Dylan, Moir, Zack, Brennan, Matt, Rambarran, Shara and Kirkman, Phil (2017), ‘Popular music education (r)evolution’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 513.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Strange, Allen (2022), Electronic Music: Systems, Techniques, and Controls, Toronto: Responsive Ecologies Lab.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Subotnick, Morton (1967), Silver Apples of the Moon, CD, New York: Nonesuch and Elektra.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Teboul, Ezra (2017), ‘The transgressive practices of silicon luthiers’, in E. R. Miranda (ed.), Guide to Unconventional Computing for Music, Berlin: Springer, pp. 85120.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. The M.E.M.S Project (n.d.), ‘Touchplates’, https://www.memsproject.info/touchplates. Accessed 18 April 2023.
  56. The MIDI Association (2023), ‘Details about MIDI 2.0, MIDI-CI, profiles and property exchange (updated November 2022)’, MIDI.org, http://www.midi.org/midi-articles/details-about-midi-2-0-midi-ci-profiles-and-property-exchange. Accessed 18 April 2023.
  57. Thumlert, Kurt and Nolan, Jason (2020), ‘Angry noise: Recomposing music pedagogies in indisciplinary modes’, in P. Trifonas (ed.), The Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education, Berlin: Springer, pp. 63355.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Thumlert, Kurt, Nolan, Jason and Harley, Daniel (2020), ‘Sound beginnings: Learning, communicating and making sense with sound’, Music Educators Journal, 107:2, pp. 6669.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Thumlert, Kurt, Nolan, Jason, Chan, Heidi and Kitzmann, Andreas (2021), ‘Together, apart: Modular sound communities in the age of COVID-19’, Journal of Music, Health, and Wellbeing, Special Issue: ‘Musicking through COVID-19: Challenges, Adaptations, and New Practices’, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Vail, Mark (2014), The Synthesizer: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding, Programming, Playing and Recording the Ultimate Electronic Instrument, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilson, Scott (2017), ‘8 of the most important modular synthesizers in music history’, Fact, 21 September, https://www.factmag.com/2017/09/21/most-important-modular-synths-in-history/. Accessed 28 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jpme_00128_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error