What do you mean? Developing a ‘model of the aesthetic dialogue’ in collaborative music making

References

1. Abramo, J. M. (2011), ‘Queering informal pedagogy: Sexuality and popular music in school’, Music Education Research, 13:4, pp. 465–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2011.632084.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allsup, R. E. (2013), ‘The compositional turn in music education: From closed forms to open texts’, in M. Kaschub and J. Smith (eds), Composing Our Future: Preparing Music Educators to Teach Composition, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–73, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832286.003.0004.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allsup, R. E. and Olson, N. J. (2012), ‘New educational frameworks for popular music and informal learning: Anticipating the second wave’, in S. Karlsen and L. Väkevä (eds), Future Prospects for Music Education: Corroborating Informal Learning Pedagogy, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 11–22.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Amabile, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, New York: Westview Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anthony, B. (2020), ‘Perspectives of learning popular music production in higher education from both sides of the glass’, doctoral thesis, Brisbane: Griffith University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Armstrong, V. (2011), Technology and the Gendering of Music Education, New York: Ashgate.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Askerøi, E. (2013), ‘Reading pop production: Sonic markers and musical identity’, doctoral thesis, Kristiansand: University of Agder.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Askerøi, E. and Viervoll, A. (2017), ‘Musical listening: Teaching studio production in an academic institution’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 231–42.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Auvinen, T. (2016), ‘A new breed of home studio producer: Agency and cultural space in contemporary home studio music production’, Etnomusikologian vuosikirja, 28, pp. 1–33, https://doi.org/10.23985/evk.60227.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Auvinen, T. (2020), ‘Creative communities of practice: Role delineation in record production in different eras and across different genres and production settings’, in A. Bourbon and S. Zagorski-Thomas (eds), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Music Production, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 161–76.
    [Google Scholar]
11. bell, a. p. (2014), ‘Trial-by-fire: A case study of the musician-engineer hybrid role in the home studio’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7:3, pp. 295–312, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.7.3.295_1.
    [Google Scholar]
12. bell, a. p. (2018), Dawn of the DAW: The Studio as Musical Instrument, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. bell, a. p. (2019), ‘Of trackers and top-liners: Learning producing and producing learning’, in Z. Moir, B. Powell and G. D. Smith (eds), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Popular Music Education: Perspectives and Practices, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 171–86.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bennett, J. (2011), ‘Collaborative songwriting: The ontology of negotiated creativity in popular music studio practice’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 5, https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/collaborative-songwriting-–-the-ontology-of-negotiated-creativity-in-popular-music-studio-practice/. Accessed 6 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bennett, J. (2012), ‘Constraint, collaboration and creativity in popular songwriting teams’, in D. Collins (ed.), The Act of Musical Composition: Studies in the Creative Process, New York: Ashgate, pp. 139–69.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bennett, J. (2013), ‘“You won’t see me”: In search of an epistemology of collaborative songwriting’, Journal of the Art of Record Production, 8, https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/%E2%80%9Cyou-won%E2%80%99t-see-me%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%93-in-search-of-an-epistemology-of-collaborative-songwriting/. Accessed 6 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Boden, M. A. (2004), The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Born, G. and Devine, K. (2015), ‘Music technology, gender, and class: Digitization, educational and social change in Britain’, Twentieth-Century Music, 12:2, pp. 135–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572215000018.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Brinkmann, S. (2018), ‘The interview’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Los Angeles: Sage Publications, pp. 997–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Brown, A. R. (2015), Music Technology and Education: Amplifying Musicality, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Burgess, R. J. (2013), The Art of Music Production: The Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Burnard, P. (2007a), ‘Creativity and technology: Critical agents of change in the work and lives of music teachers’, in J. Finney and P. Burnard (eds), Music Education with Digital Technology, London: Continuum, pp. 196–206.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Burnard, P. (2007b), ‘Reframing creativity and technology: Promoting pedagogic change in music education’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 1:1, pp. 37–55.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Burnard, P. (2012a), ‘Commentary: Musical creativity as practice’, in G. E. McPherson and G. F. Welch (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Music Education, vol. 2, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 319–36, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928019.013.0022_update_001.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Burnard, P. (2012b), ‘The practice of diverse compositional creativities’, in D. Collins (ed.), The Act of Musical Composition: Studies in the Creative Process, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 111–38.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988), ‘Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity’, in J. R. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–39, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4.
    [Google Scholar]
27. D’Errico, M. (2022), Push: Software Design and the Cultural Politics of Music Production, New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190943301.001.0001.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dyndahl, P., Karlsen, S., Skårberg, O. and Nielsen, S. G. (2014), ‘Cultural omnivorousness and musical gentrification: An outline of a sociological framework and its applications for music education research’, Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 13:1, pp. 40–69.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Eno, B. (2004), ‘The studio as compositional tool’, in C. Cox and D. Warner (eds), Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music, London: Continuum, pp. 127–30.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Folkestad, G. (2006), ‘Formal and informal learning situations or practices vs. formal and informal ways of learning’, British Journal of Music Education, 23:2, pp. 135–45, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051706006887.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Frith, S. and Zagorski-Thomas, S. (2012), The Art of Record Production: An Introductory Reader for a New Academic Field, Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gibson, J. J. (2015), ‘The theory of affordances’, in J. J. Gibson (ed.), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 119–35.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014), Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Green, L. (1997), Music, Gender, Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Green, L. (2002), How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education, Aldershot: Ashgate, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253169.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Green, L. (2008), Music, Informal Learning and the School: A New Classroom Pedagogy, Aldershot: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248523.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Harkins, P. and Prior, N. (2022), ‘(Dis)locating democratization: Music technologies in practice’, Popular Music and Society, 45:1, pp. 84–103, https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2021.1984023.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hawkins, S. (2002), Settling the Pop Score: Pop Texts and Identity Politics, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hawkins, S. (ed.) (2017), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music and Gender, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hugill, A. (2019), The Digital Musician, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hutchby, I. (2001), ‘Technologies, texts and affordances’, Sociology, 35:2, pp. 441–56, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000219.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Karlsen, S. (2010), ‘BoomTown music education and the need for authenticity: Informal learning put into practice in Swedish post-compulsory music education’, British Journal of Music Education, 27:1, pp. 35–46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. King, A. (2016), ‘Studio pedagogy: Perspectives from record producers’, in A. King and E. Himonides (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 45–66.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kvale, S. (2007), Doing Interviews, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lebler, D. (2007), ‘Student-as-master? Reflections on a learning innovation in popular music pedagogy’, International Journal of Music Education, 25:3, pp. 205–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761407083575.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lebler, D. and Hodges, N. (2017), ‘Popular music pedagogy: Dual perspectives on DIY musicianship’, in G. D. Smith, Z. Moir, M. Brennan, S. Rambarran and P. Kirkman (eds), The Routledge Research Companion to Popular Music Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 272–84, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613444.ch22.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lebler, D. and Weston, D. (2015), ‘Staying in sync: Keeping popular music pedagogy relevant to an evolving music industry’, Journal of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music, 5:1, pp. 124–38, https://doi.org/10.5429/2079-3871(2015)v5i1.8en.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Leonard, M. (2007), Gender in the Music Industry: Rock, Discourse and Girl Power, New York: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
49. McIntyre, P. (2008), ‘The systems model of creativity: Analyzing the distribution of power in the studio’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 3, https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/the-systems-model-of-creativity-analyzing-the-distribution-of-power-in-the-studio/. Accessed 6 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
50. McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., Paton, E., Kerrigan, S. and Meany, M. (2018), Educating for Creativity within Higher Education: Integration of Research into Media Practice, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Norton, L. S. (2009), Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Onsrud, S. V. (2013), ‘Kjønn på spill: kjønn i spill: En studie av ungdomsskoleelevers musisering’, doctoral thesis, Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Partti, H. (2014), ‘Cosmopolitan musicianship under construction: Digital musicians illuminating emerging values in music education’, International Journal of Music Education, 32:1, pp. 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411433727.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Røshol, A. (2024), ‘Putting the ego aside: A case study of the peer-to-peer feedback dialogue among electronic popular music makers within higher education’, Journal of Popular Music Education, online first, https://doi.org/10.1386/jpme_00134_1.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Røshol, A. W. and Sørbø, E. (2020), ‘Making music, finishing music: An inquiry into the music-making practice of popular electronic music students in the “laptop era”’, in Ø. J. Eiksund, E. Angelo and J. Knigge (eds), Music Technology in Education: Channeling and Challenging Perspectives, Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 151–78, https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.108.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sawyer, R. K. (2003), Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Seabrook, J. (2015), The Song Machine: Inside the Hit Factory, New York: W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Siampou, F., Komis, V. and Tselios, N. (2014), ‘Online versus face-to-face collaboration in the context of a computer-supported modeling task’, Computers in Human Behavior, 37, pp. 369–76.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Slater, M. (2016), ‘Processes of learning in the project studio’, in A. King and E. Himonides (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 9–26.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Söderman, J. and Folkestad, G. (2004), ‘How hip-hop musicians learn: Strategies in informal creative music making’, Music Education Research, 6:3, pp. 313–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380042000281758.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Sørbø, E. (2023), ‘Developing practices and approaches to electronic popular music in education’, doctoral thesis, Kristiansand: University of Agder, https://uia.brage.unit.no/uia-xmlui/handle/11250/3065348. Accessed 6 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sørbø, E. and Røshol, A. W. (2020), ‘Teaching aesthetics: A case study of one-to-one tuition in popular electronic music in higher education’, in Ø. J. Eiksund, E. Angelo and J. Knigge (eds), Music Technology in Education: Channeling and Challenging Perspectives, Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 257–78, https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.108.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Stake, R. E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Tobias, E. S. (2013), ‘Composing, songwriting, and producing: Informing popular music pedagogy’, Research Studies in Music Education, 35:2, pp. 213–37.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Väkevä, L. (2006), ‘Teaching popular music in Finland: What’s up, what’s ahead’, International Journal of Music Education, 24:2, pp. 126–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761406065473.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Väkevä, L. (2012), ‘The world well lost, found: Reality and authenticity in Green’s “new classroom pedagogy”’, in S. Karlsen and L. Väkevä (eds), Future Prospects for Music Education: Corroborating Informal Learning Pedagogy, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 23–49.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Whiteley, S. (ed.) (1997), Sexing the Groove: Popular Music and Gender, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Whiteley, S. (2000), Women and Popular Music: Sexuality, Identity and Subjectivity, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Williams, S. D. (2002), ‘Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas’, Personnel Review, 31:4, pp. 495–503, https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480210430391.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Withagen, R., Poel, H. J. de, Araújo, D. and Pepping, G.-J. (2012), ‘Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency’, New Ideas in Psychology, 30:2, pp. 250–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wolfe, P. (2020), Women in the Studio: Creativity, Control and Gender in Popular Music Production, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Yin, R. K. (2018), Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]