Skip to content
1981
Popular Music Education in Europe
  • ISSN: 2397-6721
  • E-ISSN: 2397-673X

Abstract

This qualitative study employs critical discourse analysis (CDA) to examine the hegemony of musical knowledge within the United Kingdom’s government-released documents, the National Plan for Music Education (NPfME) and the Model Music Curriculum (MMC). This research uses Mullet’s systematic seven-step framework to explore musical genres’ dominant hegemony and valorization and their impact on curriculum design and teacher agency. There is a focus on ages 11–14 (Key Stage 3). The integration of CDA with thematic, comparative and frequency analysis reveals a dominance of western classical music and neocolonial values within these documents. As a result, this marginalizes many musical genres and pedagogical ideologies. This study contributes to ongoing debates within UK education policy and curriculum studies. In examining how hegemonic paradigms are reproduced through policy texts, the article shows broad implications for global policy-makers and educationists. This study aims to determine the depth and extent of dominant powers that impact the school curriculum and has international relevance due to discussions around inclusivity, cultural responsiveness and equity in music education.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jpme_00161_1
2025-08-06
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. All Party Parliamentary Group for Music (APPGME) (2019), ‘Music education: State of the nation – ISM’, https://www.ism.org/images/images/State-of-the-Nation-Music-Education-WEB.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2024.
  2. Allsup, R. E. and Westerlund, H. (2012), ‘Methods and situational ethics in music education’, Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 11:1, 12448, http://act.maydaygroup.org/articles/AllsupWesterlund11_1.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, A. (2021), ‘Curriculum power positioning in classroom music education: Music curriculum design in the secondary music classroom in England’, Arts Education Policy Review, 125:2, pp. 94107, https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.2023060.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, A. (2022), ‘Understanding curriculum design in the perceptions and practices of classroom music teachers in the lower secondary school in England’, British Journal of Music Education, 39:2, pp. 15768, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051721000152.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Apple, M. W. (2004), Ideology and Curriculum, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Au, W. (2018), Reclaiming the Multicultural Roots of U.S. Curriculum: Communities of Color and Official Knowledge in Education, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM) (n.d.), ‘Who we are’, https://www.abrsm.org/en-gb/who-we-are/key-people. Accessed 9 July 2024.
  8. Banks, J. A. (2001), Cultural Diversity and Education: Foundations, Curriculum, and Teaching, 4th ed., Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bate, E. (2020), ‘Justifying music in the national curriculum: The habit concept and the question of social justice and academic rigour’, British Journal of Music Education, 37:1, pp. 315, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051718000098.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bates, V. C. (2017), ‘Critical social class theory for music education’, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18:7, http://www.ijea.org/v18n7/. Accessed 16 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 24158.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bradley, D. (2012), ‘Good for what, good for whom?: Decolonizing music education philosophies’, in C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce and P. Woodford (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Music Education, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40933.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bull, A. (2019), Class, Control, and Classical Music, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chiba, M. and Hebert, D. G. (2024), ‘Understandings of inclusivity in music education: A comparative policy study of Luxembourg and Japan’, Music Education Research, 27:1, pp. 3753, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2024.2434839.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007), Research Methods in Education, 6th ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cooke, C. and Spruce, G. (2016), Debates in Music Education, 2nd ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cox, R. W. (1983), ‘Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12:2, pp. 16275, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dalladay, C. (2017), ‘Growing musicians in English secondary schools at Key Stage 3 (age 11–14)’, British Journal of Music Education, 34:3, pp. 32135, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051717000110.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Daubney, A. (2021), ‘Reviewing the model music curriculum in detail’, Independent Society of Musicians, 26 March, https://www.ism.org/news/reviewing-model-music-curriculum/. Accessed 12 July 2024.
  23. Denzin, N. K. (1978), The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Department for Education (DfE) (2013), ‘The national curriculum in England: Music programmes of study’, 11 September, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-music-programmes-of-study. Accessed 16 July 2025.
  25. De Villiers, A. C. (2021), ‘(Re)organizing the music curriculum as multicultural music education’, International Journal of Music Education, 39:4, pp. 38393, https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420986219.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DfE (2021), Model Music Curriculum: Non-Statutory Guidance for the National Curriculum in England, London: DfE.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. DfE (2022), The Power of Music to Change Lives: A National Plan for Music Education, London: DfE.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dunne, M., Pryor, J. and Yates, P. (2005), Becoming a Researcher: A Companion to the Research Process, New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fairclough, N. (2003), Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, London: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fairclough, N. (2013), ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in J. P. Gee and M. Handford (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 920.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fautley, M. and Daubney, A. (2019), ‘Some thoughts on curriculum in music education’, British Journal of Music Education, 36:1, pp. 14, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051719000044.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Finney, J., Phillpott, C. and Spruce, G. (2021), Creative and Critical Projects in Classroom Music: Fifty Years of Sound and Silence, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Flick, U. (2013), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fowler, R. (1997), Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Freire, P. (1972), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gay, G. (2010), Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2nd ed., New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gee, J. P. (2014), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Goertz, G. and Mahoney, J. (2012), A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Green, L. (2008), Music, Informal Learning and the School: A New Classroom Pedagogy, Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hall, S. (1997), ‘The spectacle of the “Other”’, in S. Hall (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 22590.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hargreaves, D. J., Purves, R. M., Welch, G. F. and Marshall, N. A. (2007), ‘Developing identities and attitudes in musicians and classroom music teachers’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77:3, pp. 66582, https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X154676.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jenkins, C. (2022), ‘Assimilation and integration in classical music education’, Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 21:2, pp. 15681, https://doi.org/10.22176/act21.2.156.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Joseph, D. and Southcott, J. (2014), ‘Classroom music teaching in Australia: Reflections from the national review’, Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, pp. 1728.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kokotsaki, D. and Whitford, H. (2024), ‘Students’ attitudes to school music and perceived barriers to GCSE music uptake: A phenomenographic approach’, British Journal of Music Education, 41, pp. 3150, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051723000426.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mark, M. L. (1995), ‘Music education history as prologue to the future: Practitioners and researchers’, The Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education, 16:2, pp. 98121, https://doi.org/10.1177/153660069501600202.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mark, M. L. (2014), ‘Music education history and the future’, in C. Randles (ed.), Music Education: Navigating the Future, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 312.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mark, M. L. (2021), ‘Music education and the national standards: A historical review’, Visions of Research in Music Education, 16, https://opencommons.uconn.edu/vrme/vol16/iss6/13?utm_source=opencommons.uconn.edu%2Fvrme%2Fvol16%2Fiss6%2F13&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages. Accessed 16 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Moore, G. (2014), ‘Mind the gap: Privileging epistemic access to knowledge in the transition from leaving certificate music to higher education’, Irish Educational Studies, 33:3, pp. 24968, https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2014.926165.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mullet, D. R. (2018), ‘A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research’, Journal of Advanced Academics, 29:2, pp. 11642, https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x18758260.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Music Teachers Association (MTA) (n.d.), ‘Model music curriculum’, https://www.musicteachers.org/model-music-curriculum/. Accessed 16 July 2025.
  54. OFSTED (2012), Music in Schools: Wider Still, and Wider, London: GOV.UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. OFSTED (2021), ‘Research review series: Music’, Gov.uk, 12 July, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-review-series-music. Accessed 30 July 2025.
  56. OFSTED (2023a), Education Inspection Framework, London: GOV.UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. OFSTED (2023b), Schools Commentary: Deep Dives in School Inspections, London: GOV.UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Philpott, C. (2022), ‘What does it mean to decolonise the school music curriculum?’, London Review of Education, 20:1, https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.20.1.07.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Priestley, M. (2021), ‘Curriculum development’, 2 April, https://mrpriestley.wordpress.com/category/curriculum-development/. Accessed 15 July 2024.
  60. Ragin, C. C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sánchez-Gatt, L. L., Menon, S. A. and Hess, J. (2025), ‘Troubling transcultural practices: Anti-colonial thinking for music education’, Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 24:1, pp. 4882, https://doi.org/10.22176/act24.1.48.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schippers, H. (2010), Facing the Music: Shaping Music Education from a Global Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Scott, B. (2021), ‘A model music curriculum for England’, Bill Scott’s Blog, 4 March, https://blogs.bath.ac.uk/edswahs/2022/03/04/a-model-music-curriculum-for-england/. Accessed 15 July 2024.
  64. Spruce, G. (2015), ‘Music education, social justice, and the “student voice”: Addressing student alienation through a dialogical conception of music education’, in C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce and P. Woodford (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Justice in Music Education, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 287301.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Spruce, G. (2024), ‘Knowledge and social justice in English school music education’, British Journal of Music Education, online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2024.2309651.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Spruce, G., Stanley, A. M. and Li, M. (2021), ‘Music teacher professional agency as a challenge to music education policy’, Arts Education Policy Review, 122:1, pp. 6574, https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1756020.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Stavrou, N. E. and O’Connell, L. (2022), ‘Music teachers at the crossroads: Navigating the curriculum as planned and lived’, Music Education Research, 24:2, pp. 16679, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2038109.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Strange, S. (1987), ‘The persistent myth of lost hegemony’, International Organization, 41:4, pp. 55174, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027600.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993), ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse & Society, 4:2, pp. 24983, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Dijk, T. A. (2008), ‘Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: Problem or pseudo-problem?’, Discourse & Society, 19:6, pp. 82128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095897.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Volk, T. M. (1998), Music Education and Multiculturalism: Foundations and Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Walters, C. (2021), ‘Response to the model music curriculum’, The Musicians’ Union, 29 March, https://musiciansunion.org.uk/news/response-to-the-model-music-curriculum. Accessed 15 July 2024.
  73. Ward, H. (2019), ‘Exclusive: Music curriculum plans “deeply concerning”’, Tes Magazine, 3 October, https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/exclusive-music-curriculum-plans-deeply-concerning. Accessed 15 July 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wodak, R. (2001), ‘What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments’, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2009), ‘Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology’, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, pp. 133.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Young, M. and Lambert, D. (2014), Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2018), Research Methods in Education, 8th ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Daubney, A. and Mackrill, D. (2018), ‘Changes in secondary music curriculum provision over time 2016–18: Summary of the research by Dr Ally Daubney and Duncan Mackrill’, University of Sussex, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=changes-in-secondary-music-curriculum-provision-over-time-2016-18.pdf&site=319. Accessed 12 August 2024.
  79. Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S. (1992), What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006), ‘Discourse and manipulation’, Discourse & Society, 17:3, pp. 35983, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) (2015), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jpme_00161_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jpme_00161_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test